REDOXO Posted June 17, 2013 Report Share Posted June 17, 2013 Clubs dont keep unhappy players! If an agent gets a player interested in moving to another club then he will move Ala Bolaise. If a decent Prem/Champ club show an interest the boy will almost certainly go and no amount of we dont have to sell will keep him! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCFC RED Posted June 17, 2013 Report Share Posted June 17, 2013 I'm gonna go bang my head against a wall..... HIS WAGES DO NOT COUNT SO WHY WOULD WE? As any cash received from the transfer will be classed as revenue? Therefore creating a larger transfer budget and creating more space for wages? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CheddarReds Posted June 17, 2013 Report Share Posted June 17, 2013 Keep Cunningham. Moloney and Cunningham (hopefully Flint) will prove to be a top few defensive players in L1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KeepUpLino Posted June 17, 2013 Report Share Posted June 17, 2013 As any cash received from the transfer will be classed as revenue? Therefore creating a larger transfer budget and creating more space for wages? Go on then, tell me how much it will cost to firstly sign someone of cunninghams calibre and then to pay his wages if this player was signed tmor??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corleone Posted June 17, 2013 Report Share Posted June 17, 2013 The bloke is a class act. No way we should get rid of him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
citywest30 Posted June 17, 2013 Report Share Posted June 17, 2013 Bhasera and Reeves are both attack minded full backs, who are just as competent in offensive and defensive positions. I think we'll sign one of these two, to give us furthered depth and back up in two positions, saving money on wages that we can then use elsewhere. Is that not what we already have in the form of Bryan tho? Would be open to the Reeves deal if it's to play off the front 2 like another post said he did at Southend. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexukhc Posted June 17, 2013 Report Share Posted June 17, 2013 Captain for the new season yeah? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cider red Posted June 17, 2013 Report Share Posted June 17, 2013 As any cash received from the transfer will be classed as revenue? Therefore creating a larger transfer budget and creating more space for wages? I don't know that much about ffp if im being honest, but what ive taken from people who are knowledgeable about the matter on here is that in the bottom two divisions its JUST WAGES that are restricted. So we have to keep to under 60% of our turn over on wages, transfer budget doesn't make a difference and I cant imagine we would get someone of cunninghams quality, waste of time getting rid of him imo, he will be mickey bell esque in league one! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CiderJar Posted June 18, 2013 Report Share Posted June 18, 2013 we've lost 18 million once and this has now been greatly reduced, This ^ Why is it that people panic when official accounts are published when they are already out of date at the time of publication? The latest accounts were published in December 2012 (for the year ending 31st May 2012) and will include money committed more than two years ago by now. To illustrate; the latest accounts will have included the wages of David James and Nicky Maynard, both ancient history as far as playing for the club is concerned..."City's annual accounts are now available online, showing a loss of £14,406,061 on the year ended May 31st 2012". http://www.bcfc.co.uk/club/annualaccounts.aspx (also the loss was £14.4m, although players wages amounted to £18.6m, and the majority of the club debt is to Steve Lansdown who could, if he wanted it, convert it to equity through the issue of new shares in exchange for loans, but for the time being chooses not to) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCFC RED Posted June 18, 2013 Report Share Posted June 18, 2013 I don't know that much about ffp if im being honest, but what ive taken from people who are knowledgeable about the matter on here is that in the bottom two divisions its JUST WAGES that are restricted. So we have to keep to under 60% of our turn over on wages, transfer budget doesn't make a difference and I cant imagine we would get someone of cunninghams quality, waste of time getting rid of him imo, he will be mickey bell esque in league one! I know what you mean that its quite a shady subject. But surely if a player is sold it would be classed at turnover because it will be additional revenue received. And being a club that is in high level of debt it would certainly be beneficial financially to sell him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PigeonWhiskers Posted June 18, 2013 Report Share Posted June 18, 2013 He'll be by far the best left back in league 1, so we should keep him. It'll only be an advantage for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
City1970 Posted June 18, 2013 Report Share Posted June 18, 2013 If it raises cash to strengthen central defence and central midfield then cash in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.