Briz Posted August 5, 2013 Report Share Posted August 5, 2013 Injured... again! Getting boring now. Need to get rid next season, hes always *****n injured Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeh Posted August 5, 2013 Report Share Posted August 5, 2013 Injured... again! Getting boring now. Need to get rid next season, hes always *****n injured less then our other striker Taylor tho Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_BCFC Posted August 5, 2013 Report Share Posted August 5, 2013 No shock! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRISTOL86 Posted August 5, 2013 Report Share Posted August 5, 2013 Behave, anyone can take a knock especially in a first game. It's probably a curveball anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Padlad Posted August 5, 2013 Report Share Posted August 5, 2013 Also Harewood is playing tonight for under 21's. Why? Unless SOD plans to play him two days in a row would tomorrow not be a more useful game? Unless we plan to play Taylor upfront by himself Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeh Posted August 5, 2013 Report Share Posted August 5, 2013 Behave, anyone can take a knock especially in a first game. It's probably a curveball anyway. I suspect he wouldn't of played tomorrow regardless, I also suspect he will be in the starting 11 saturday against cov Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BcfcLamb Posted August 5, 2013 Report Share Posted August 5, 2013 Source? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeh Posted August 5, 2013 Report Share Posted August 5, 2013 Source? natch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRISTOL86 Posted August 5, 2013 Report Share Posted August 5, 2013 Source? All it was was a tweet saying he took a kick to the Achilles and they'll see how he is. OP has made something out of nothing and used it as a stick to beat Baldock with... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CheddarReds Posted August 5, 2013 Report Share Posted August 5, 2013 Also Harewood is playing tonight for under 21's. Why? Unless SOD plans to play him two days in a row would tomorrow not be a more useful game? Unless we plan to play Taylor upfront by himself I don't think Harewood is fully fit yet so that's why he might be playing for U21's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeh Posted August 5, 2013 Report Share Posted August 5, 2013 I don't think Harewood is fully fit yet so that's why he might be playing for U21's he said himself he wasn't fit so I expect he will be playing u21 games to get full fitness as quick as possible, our system we employed saturday would suit him better then baldock anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCAGFC Posted August 5, 2013 Report Share Posted August 5, 2013 I would have brought Harewood on for the last 15 minutes on Saturday anyway, Baldock was very poor. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redcherryberry Posted August 5, 2013 Report Share Posted August 5, 2013 I would have brought Harewood on for the last 15 minutes on Saturday anyway, Baldock was very poor. Said exactly the same at the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeh Posted August 5, 2013 Report Share Posted August 5, 2013 I would have brought Harewood on for the last 15 minutes on Saturday anyway, Baldock was very poor. I don't think he was poor I think he was isolated Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bowie Posted August 5, 2013 Report Share Posted August 5, 2013 less then our other striker Taylor tho Taylor has had the one injury which has ruled him out long term last season, other than that unaware of any other injury issues. Unlike Baldock the sicknote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor10 Posted August 5, 2013 Report Share Posted August 5, 2013 One of the reasons we need another striker. We can't rely on him to stay fit all season! Never guna happen! I would guess he will be fit for Cov as SOD will probably play a few fringe players tomorrow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Murraysrightplum Posted August 5, 2013 Report Share Posted August 5, 2013 Kick on the Achilles, doesn't say he's out for months! MH had 45 minutes today but I expect Taylor to play anyway... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCAGFC Posted August 5, 2013 Report Share Posted August 5, 2013 I don't think he was poor I think he was isolated Baldock was poor the whole game IMO, he should have got a shot away in the 1st few minutes when he was clear with only the GK to beat but allowed a DF to catch up with him and get a challenge in. Yes he was isolated for much of the game but when Bradford pushed their FBs right up late 1st half & all 2nd (they played 2-6-2 most of the game), he was only up against 2 DFs, he could have pulled them about to allow JET & others space to run into. To me he was the 2nd worst player on the day behind Fielding. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeh Posted August 5, 2013 Report Share Posted August 5, 2013 Baldock was poor the whole game IMO, he should have got a shot away in the 1st few minutes when he was clear with only the GK to beat but allowed a DF to catch up with him and get a challenge in. Yes he was isolated for much of the game but when Bradford pushed their FBs right up late 1st half & all 2nd (they played 2-6-2 most of the game), he was only up against 2 DFs, he could have pulled them about to allow JET & others space to run into. To me he was the 2nd worst player on the day behind Fielding. the ball went behind him so he couldn't get a shot away he was very unlucky not to score after wagstaff when the keeper tipped it wide Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRISTOL86 Posted August 5, 2013 Report Share Posted August 5, 2013 Taylor has had the one injury which has ruled him out long term last season, other than that unaware of any other injury issues. Unlike Baldock the sicknote. I love how a few people label him injury prone and the sheep jump on the bandwagon. Just exactly how many games has he missed in his career due to injury? His appearance stats at MK certainly don't suggest being plagued with injury. Kelly will miss more games this season than Baldock did last but no one will label him a sick note... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bowie Posted August 5, 2013 Report Share Posted August 5, 2013 Baldock was poor the whole game IMO, he should have got a shot away in the 1st few minutes when he was clear with only the GK to beat but allowed a DF to catch up with him and get a challenge in. Yes he was isolated for much of the game but when Bradford pushed their FBs right up late 1st half & all 2nd (they played 2-6-2 most of the game), he was only up against 2 DFs, he could have pulled them about to allow JET & others space to run into. To me he was the 2nd worst player on the day behind Fielding. Amother point on Baldock? Hardly showed himself to be a long term captain, far from it, Think its a matter of time until Flint gets captains armband based on Saturday. Even the short spell that Pack was on, he was dishing out more orders and organisation that Baldock, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Opeth67 Posted August 5, 2013 Report Share Posted August 5, 2013 Baldock wasn't as bad as Fontaine. And he could well be fit for next week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bowie Posted August 5, 2013 Report Share Posted August 5, 2013 I love how a few people label him injury prone and the sheep jump on the bandwagon. Just exactly how many games has he missed in his career due to injury? His appearance stats at MK certainly don't suggest being plagued with injury. Kelly will miss more games this season than Baldock did last but no one will label him a sick note... Missed large spell at West Ham due to injury problems, Last season only managed 24 starts alot spduemto injury. MK dons had reoccurring problems with Hamstrings, missed alot of 2009/10 season and only started 20 games, following season he managed 30. Injuries have followed him constantly Lee Matthews, Steve Brooker, is Baldock the next one who could offer so much but his body just can't handle it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRISTOL86 Posted August 5, 2013 Report Share Posted August 5, 2013 Missed large spell at West Ham due to injury problems, Last season only managed 24 starts alot spduemto injury. MK dons had reoccurring problems with Hamstrings, missed alot of 2009/10 season and only started 20 games, following season he managed 30. Injuries have followed him constantly Well in 08/09 through to 10/11 he played 3 more games for MK than Maynard played for us, yet I don't see anyone brandishing him as a sick note. All players get injured, but for some reason Baldock is labelled a sick note when he's played about 160 games in the last 5 seasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarcusX Posted August 5, 2013 Report Share Posted August 5, 2013 I would have brought Harewood on for the last 15 minutes on Saturday anyway, Baldock was very poor. Still got an assist! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeh Posted August 5, 2013 Report Share Posted August 5, 2013 I love how a few people label him injury prone and the sheep jump on the bandwagon. Just exactly how many games has he missed in his career due to injury? His appearance stats at MK certainly don't suggest being plagued with injury. Kelly will miss more games this season than Baldock did last but no one will label him a sick note... Millen signed Taylor in June 2011 and has only taken part in 33 games out of over 90 due to injury yet he isn't a sick note Baldock was available in over 40 games in his first season with city yet is labeled injury prone.......... Unbelievable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bowie Posted August 5, 2013 Report Share Posted August 5, 2013 Well in 08/09 through to 10/11 he played 3 more games for MK than Maynard played for us, yet I don't see anyone brandishing him as a sick note. All players get injured, but for some reason Baldock is labelled a sick note when he's played about 160 games in the last 5 seasons. Maynard.....the player who missed a massive part of that spell thorugh injury and has since leaving City played less than 20 games. Sicknote, read the Maynard thread from last week people saying same thing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fiale Posted August 5, 2013 Report Share Posted August 5, 2013 Some just don't like him, so like sheep are jumping onto the sick note bandwagon. He had a decent game on Saturday, even though we were not playing to his strengths. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bowie Posted August 5, 2013 Report Share Posted August 5, 2013 Millen signed Taylor in June 2011 and has only taken part in 33 games out of over 90 due to injury yet he isn't a sick note Baldock was available in over 40 games in his first season with city yet is labeled injury prone.......... Unbelievable Available for 40 games. Really.......love to see you back that up. Read my previous post, injuries have followed him. Taylor has had 2 two injuries. Both have been long term, however when he joined he was very much a player for the future so was among the fringes of the tema and not always picked despite fitness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRISTOL86 Posted August 5, 2013 Report Share Posted August 5, 2013 Millen signed Taylor in June 2011 and has only taken part in 33 games out of over 90 due to injury yet he isn't a sick note Baldock was available in over 40 games in his first season with city yet is labeled injury prone.......... Unbelievable Yep, that's OTIB logic Maynard.....the player who missed a massive part of that spell thorugh injury and has since leaving City played less than 20 games. Sicknote, read the Maynard thread from last week people saying same thing The difference being people only started calling Maynard that AFTER he left, out of bitterness, as they were delighted to see his career hit the brakes Some just don't like him, so like sheep are jumping onto the sick note bandwagon. He had a decent game on Saturday, even though we were not playing to his strengths. Yep agree 100%. Once someone gets labelled on here it sticks! Available for 40 games. Really.......love to see you back that up. Read my previous post, injuries have followed him. Taylor has had 2 two injuries. Both have been long term, however when he joined he was very much a player for the future so was among the fringes of the tema and not always picked despite fitness. Injuries have followed him, yet he's played 160 games in the last 5 seasons? Let's ignore Maynard then, how many other examples would you like? In the same timescale, these players have made the following appearances Demba Ba - 166 Sylvain Ebanks-Blake Marvin Emnes - 143 Jermaine Beckford - 123 Look at that list of sicknotes! Thank god we don't have any of them, we'd be really screwed! Also worth mentioning that for his entire spell at WHU he was a bench player, and didn't always even get on the pitch. Still, why let meaningless statistics get in the way of a good point, eh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.