Jump to content
IGNORED

It Needs To Be 442!


Go Junior GO

Recommended Posts

Maybe.

...............................PARISH

MALONEY..OSBOURNE...EL ABD..CUNNINGHAM

WAGSTAF.....GILLET........ELLIOT.............BRYAN

..................BALDOCK........BARNET

 

Think that would be the most solid 4-4-2 but I'd personally stick with the 5-3-2 formation to acomodate JET unless you played 4-4-1-1 with Jet in the hole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Disagree, sorry but don't think we have players to play 442 only system I can see us working with is 4231.

Fielding

Maloney

Williams

El abd

Cunningham

Pack

W Elliott

Baldock

Reid

Bryan

Jet

I think the best way it could work is to play a diamond formation similar to what SC put out against Tamworth. The 3-5-2 looked solid against Walsall but seems to be failing now, whether that's due to El-Abd's arrival is debatable, but perhaps he would look more solid in a traditional back four? Maybe this could work...

Fielding

Maloney Osborne Williams Cunningham

Gillett

W Elliot Bryan

JET

. Baldock Barnett

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd agree with that, except my defence would be: Osborne, El Abd, Fontaine*, Williams. Plenty of height and experience in that defense.

 

In midfield I'd play Wagstaff and Wade Elliot wide with instructions to tuck in and help out the central midfield, which would be Gillet and Marvin Elliot.

 

* He is still with us, right? Well even at his worst there's no way he's as bad as Flint seems to be, plus he's left sided.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pack, Flint and Parish (harsh but, lack of communication for the first - obviously more Flint's error - and weak attempt to save the second) should be dropped on last night's display.

 

Fielding

 

Maloney El-Abd Williams Cunningham

 

W.Elliott M.Elliott Gillett Bryan

 

JET

 

Baldock

 

Nothing against Barnett but JET needs to come in and he won't be fit enough to start two in a week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we are going to go for it, I wouldn't mind seeing

 

Parish

Maloney, El Abd, Williams, Cunningham

       

          Elliot, Gillet

 

Jet (cuts inside), Reid or W. Elliot, Bryan

                  Baldock

 

 

Would require a lot of discipline, especially from Gillet and Elliot, but enables our most creative players to play and interchange. Unsure on Bryan still but he's our best genuinely left sided winger.

 

Allows us to bring on Burns if we need more pace, move Jet around to suit and swap Baldock for Barnett if needs be

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yeah okay let's leave JET on the bench.... :facepalm:

 

Find it staggering the amount of people that wanted him benched last night - heard we had our LOWEST amount of shots on target all season!! Says it all really.. I believe we need players like Baldock and Barnett as they provide a different sort of threat but JET is a class above. He hasn't been in his greatest form the last few games but he still creates more than anyone else even when out of form.

 

Just wait until he hits a purple patch again.. You cannot leave him on the bench

 

The thing that really gets my goat is people calling him "lazy" - how do you define that exactly?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

           Fielding

 

Maloney   El Abd  Williams  Cunningham

 

            Pack M Elliott

 

                Reid 

 

Burns   Baldock    Jet

 

 

Pack and Elliott would have to put a lot of graft in, but **** it, lets go on the attack, cause we can't defend.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

                              Parish

 

Moloney    Carey  El Abd    Cunningham

 

                    Pack Marvin

 

  Burns              Jet              Bryan

 

                    Baldock

 

 

Shame not to include Reid as I think he is our busiest midfielder or Williams who reads the game well. Both will, hopefully, be here for a long time to come.

 

Whoever he picks in whatever formation the time has come to leave them to it and stop all the constant tinkering.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...