You Do The Dziekanowski Posted January 29, 2014 Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 I know he's taken loads of abuse on here but what he is actually saying is true. SC- He says what we want to hear, Yes I prefer his way of attacking a game and pleased he's in charge, But the amount of BS that comes out of his mouth (we were warned) is astonishing. Not once at wolves did we look like we would win and apparently we were unlucky? Flint- Why has he taken so much abuse? Yes the OG was shambolic but overall he has been what I expected of him, Dominant in the air (in the 3 at the back he's been solid) then we go and buy El Abd and it all goes back to the error prone defence we had before So just because he isn't saying what you want to hear KITR is actually speaking a lot of sense Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
!james Posted January 29, 2014 Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 He is beginning to make Robboreds agenda against Johnson seem pale in comparison, embarrassing really Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phileas Fogg Posted January 29, 2014 Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 Agreed - if thinks turn sour for SC people will be saying what kitr has been saying from day 1. At least he's sticking to his guns I'm keeping my powder dry for now.. Not quite sure what to think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
You Do The Dziekanowski Posted January 29, 2014 Author Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 He is beginning to make Robboreds agenda against Johnson seem pale in comparison, embarrassing really Yes he seems to have something against SC but what he says is true, When we win the interviews are enjoyable but when we lose its excuses and lies, What does that achieve? Nothing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid in the Riot Posted January 29, 2014 Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 He is beginning to make Robboreds agenda against Johnson seem pale in comparison, embarrassing really Have you had anything constructive to say? Ever? I criticise the board a fair bit as well. Yet I don't see you calling me up as having an "agenda" with them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoldenBall Posted January 29, 2014 Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 He does have an agenda, and it's embarrassing really but at this present moment everything he's saying looks to be correct His best quote "It won't even be an achievement if SC keeps us up" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid in the Riot Posted January 29, 2014 Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 He does have an agenda, and it's embarrassing really but at this present moment everything he's saying looks to be correct His best quote "It won't even be an achievement if SC keeps us up" And that Sir, is your best quote! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sodburyred Posted January 29, 2014 Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 He does have an agenda, and it's embarrassing really but at this present moment everything he's saying looks to be correct His best quote "It won't even be an achievement if SC keeps us up" But last week everything he was saying looked to be incorrect. Who knows what next week will bring. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barrs Court Red Posted January 29, 2014 Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 All I know is kitr is a top lad, and has followed City and England everywhere. If he has an agenda or wants to have a moan, he at least structures it in a way that supports what hes saying. Rather that than some idiot calling for blind faith "because its what fans do". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sodburyred Posted January 29, 2014 Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 Agreed - if thinks turn sour for SC people will be saying what kitr has been saying from day 1. At least he's sticking to his guns I'm keeping my powder dry for now.. Not quite sure what to think Anyone who has an agenda against a manager is going to be right sometimes during a season. Its the nature of the game. Can look smug when we are loosing and look a tool when we are winning. Can look even smugger when the time comes to replace the manager. Strange way of supporting the team I feel though.Constantly undermining the manager. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timothy bird Posted January 29, 2014 Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 Find very little to disagree with in what kitr says, He is consistent and honest in his opinions,I didn't want SC as manager because I consider him to be a Blustering buffoon who may fool people in the short term with sound bites, cliches, and blister, but imo in the medium term will prove to be a disaster for our club, many loyal city fans were against his appointment and I believe that his team selections, tactics, lack of man management skills ( imo ) and embarrassingly inarticulate interviews will increasingly cause supporters to rue the day that he was appointed, ok I admit that I have a agenda in that I Inever wanted the guy in our club, But I sincerely hope I am wrong about the a him and he can bring usuccess that our long suffering fan base surely deserves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Major Isewater Posted January 29, 2014 Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 Gurt you with your own personal thread ! Blinkin show off ;0) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aizoon Posted January 29, 2014 Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 Gurt you with your own personal thread ! Blinkin show off ;0) Yes, look what you've started. Horace wants his own thread now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IdliketoRogerMoore Posted January 29, 2014 Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 Anyone who has an agenda against a manager is going to be right sometimes during a season. Its the nature of the game. Can look smug when we are loosing and look a tool when we are winning. Can look even smugger when the time comes to replace the manager. Strange way of supporting the team I feel though.Constantly undermining the manager.you can still support the team and not agree with what's going on( change of manager/tactics so on and so forth!) For the record I think sc is an Baffoon and didn't want but now here's go Baffoon! Coyr! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Major Isewater Posted January 29, 2014 Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 you can still support the team and not agree with what's going on( change of manager/tactics so on and so forth!) For the record I think sc is an Baffoon and didn't want but now here's go Baffoon! Coyr! Ahem ,that's "buffoon" i think you'll find . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redcherryberry Posted January 29, 2014 Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 Find very little to disagree with in what kitr says, He is consistent and honest in his opinions,I didn't want SC as manager because I consider him to be a Blustering buffoon who may fool people in the short term with sound bites, cliches, and blister, but imo in the medium term will prove to be a disaster for our club, many loyal city fans were against his appointment and I believe that his team selections, tactics, lack of man management skills ( imo ) and embarrassingly inarticulate interviews will increasingly cause supporters to rue the day that he was appointed, ok I admit that I have a agenda in that I Inever wanted the guy in our club, But I sincerely hope I am wrong about the a him and he can bring usuccess that our long suffering fan base surely deserves. Well said. Agree with all that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich_s Posted January 29, 2014 Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 you can still support the team and not agree with what's going on( change of manager/tactics so on and so forth!) For the record I think sc is an Baffoon and didn't want but now here's go Baffoon! Coyr! To an extent S O'Driscoll got away with bad results for a long time because people liked to believe he was talking sense. SC will not be afforded the same luxury because people will quickly draw the conclusion that he is a buffoon. That's not a regional stereotype based on his accent but purely on what he says. I remember watching Stevenage have so much possession in the second half and I looked down at the dugout and SC and I just wondered what or if anything at all was going through his mind. However, I'll support him through thick and thin but not relegation. Big up the buffoon. Bring it on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aizoon Posted January 29, 2014 Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 Ahem ,that's "buffoon" i think you'll find . I think that technically a "baffoon" is a buffoon who's baffled Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoldenBall Posted January 29, 2014 Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 But last week everything he was saying looked to be incorrect. Who knows what next week will bring. Whatever happens, KITR will be anti-SC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob k Posted January 29, 2014 Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 Whatever happens, KITR will be anti-SC He's been consistent from day 1 and despite all the name calling etc he's received he's still managed to put his point across better than the majority sniping at him because he dares to have a different opinion than them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aizoon Posted January 29, 2014 Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 He's been consistent from day 1 and despite all the name calling etc he's received he's still managed to put his point across better than the majority sniping at him because he dares to have a different opinion than them. The late and unregretted Joseph McCarthy accused everyone to the left of Ghengiz Khan of being "prematurely anti-fascist". Maybe in months to come, KITR will be accused of being "prematurely anti-Cotterill"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
You Do The Dziekanowski Posted January 29, 2014 Author Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 Sorry Horace and Bridesmaid, Get OTIB on your back and make well reasoned posts as to why you feel differently to others and you'll have a thread in no time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Major Isewater Posted January 29, 2014 Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 Sorry Horace and Bridesmaid, Get OTIB on your back and make well reasoned posts as to why you feel differently to others and you'll have a thread in no time i think it would be very uncomfortable on Horace's spiney back Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aizoon Posted January 29, 2014 Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 i think it would be very uncomfortable on Horace's spiney back That hedgehog in the advert lets the Oddsfather stroke him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sodburyred Posted January 29, 2014 Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 you can still support the team and not agree with what's going on( change of manager/tactics so on and so forth!) For the record I think sc is an Baffoon and didn't want but now here's go Baffoon! Coyr! I have no doubt your loyal fans. It's just the reluctance of some to even give him a chance. I didn't want him and was hoping it was untrue when rumoured. But now hes here he is starting to grow on me. Just seems silly to have some strange allegiance to the previous manager and hate our own. Even when playing well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob k Posted January 29, 2014 Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 I have no doubt your loyal fans. It's just the reluctance of some to even give him a chance. I didn't want him and was hoping it was untrue when rumoured. But now hes here he is starting to grow on me. Just seems silly to have some strange allegiance to the previous manager and hate our own. Even when playing well. My annoyance is more aimed at the board, SOD told everybody it was going to get worse before it got better, they then sack him and bring in a manager with completely different beliefs and principles meaning were at square one again. There's no clear plan or vision from the top. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aizoon Posted January 29, 2014 Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 My annoyance is more aimed at the board, SOD told everybody it was going to get worse before it got better, they then sack him and bring in a manager with completely different beliefs and principles meaning were at square one again. There's no clear plan or vision from the top. Exactly what I feel. People here seem to be taking sides and slagging off O'Driscoll or Cotterill depending on taste, whereas the real problem is the inability of the Board to set out a strategy and keep to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Major Isewater Posted January 29, 2014 Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 Exactly what I feel. People here seem to be taking sides and slagging off O'Driscoll or Cotterill depending on taste, whereas the real problem is the inability of the Board to set out a strategy and keep to it. i thought the old board were better than the new board. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aizoon Posted January 29, 2014 Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 i thought the old board were better than the new board. Yeah, well if you keep chopping and changing the board... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Portland Bill Posted January 29, 2014 Report Share Posted January 29, 2014 My annoyance is more aimed at the board, SOD told everybody it was going to get worse before it got better, they then sack him and bring in a manager with completely different beliefs and principles meaning were at square one again. There's no clear plan or vision from the top. In one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.