Eco Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 Believe it was his first first league goal for the club last night, congratulations Wes ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 Prob him and Greg the only two to come out with any credit last night. Well done to him, should start on Saturday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoyalRed Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 Overshadowed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrahamC Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 The biggest positive of Cotterill's time in charge, it seems incredible that he was overlooked by SOD, though in balance others seem to be going backwards. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MichaelRobartes Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 Well done Wes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swanker Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 Surely the winger we're looking to sign ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor10 Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 It's no less than he's deserved. He's been fantastic under SC and as GrahamC says it's very strange how he was over looked by SOD. He needs to start next game. Simple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UREDS_91 Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 Wes is a breath of fresh air! Him, Waggy, Cunningham and Pack all played well yesterday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedM Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 Definitely a glimmer of hope on a mainly poor performance. Coventry had a few very quick players and Burns being the same caused them problems. I couldn't quite see who scored at the time, somehow they didn't announce it either, I thought it was Gillett for some reason so I'm glad it was Burns. The only thing that concerns me is he looked too good for us. I think he will attract attention. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Major Isewater Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 Definitely a glimmer of hope on a mainly poor performance. Coventry had a few very quick players and Burns being the same caused them problems. I couldn't quite see who scored at the time, somehow they didn't announce it either, I thought it was Gillett for some reason so I'm glad it was Burns. The only thing that concerns me is he looked too good for us. I think he will attract attention. Looking too good for us should n't in all fairness be too difficult ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcfczd Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 Looked good when he came on, think Cotterill will be in a dilemma as to whether to start him. I'm unsure if he has enough in his locker to be able to mix it up enough when he is marked and has two players on him. And I don't think as a team we are clever enough to exploit the space created by him being marked by two players. Would be nice to see him get a chance. As I believe if he keeps up the good work he can become a top player for us! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid in the Riot Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 The biggest positive of Cotterill's time in charge, it seems incredible that he was overlooked by SOD, though in balance others seem to be going backwards. Not incredible at all. SoD didn't play with wingers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave L Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 somehow they didn't announce it either, I thought it was Gillett for some reason so I'm glad it was Burns. Both the fourth official and I called it as an own-goal at the time, which is why I didn't announce anything. More than happy that the credit has now gone to Wes though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedM Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 Both the fourth official and I called it as an own-goal at the time, which is why I didn't announce anything. More than happy that the credit has now gone to Wes though. Thanks for that. I did wonder if that was the case, possible own goal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Merrick's Marvels Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 Was sat right behind it - his header deflected off a defender and wrong footed their keeper completely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petehinton Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 I still wouldn't start him yet. It'll end up another Ivan Sproule scenario where's he's probably best just coming on for a short space of the game and using his pace against tired legs. With Sproule, fans just assumed he could sprint at full pelt for 90 minutes and not be blowing after the 4th/5th time and got on his back - can see the same happening to Wes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westred1 Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 I still wouldn't start him yet. It'll end up another Ivan Sproule scenario where's he's probably best just coming on for a short space of the game and using his pace against tired legs. With Sproule, fans just assumed he could sprint at full pelt for 90 minutes and not be blowing after the 4th/5th time and got on his back - can see the same happening to Wes Whilst that's true, Burns has a few more strings to his bow and more talent than Ivan had, IMO. Perhaps he isn't ready yet, you won't know until you experiment. Joe Bryan was thrown in the mix out of the blue for his debut by McInnes against Leicester and it hasn't done him too much harm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dandare 1966 Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 Let him start for Christ sake can always take him off but be better two be 2 up for a change and then have to make subs while we always have to bring on when we are in the shit . Sure when he starts with the write formation and selections of the rest the team we mite take somebody to the cleaners ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Major Isewater Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 It certainly does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Major Isewater Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 Let him start for Christ sake can always take him off but be better two be 2 up for a change and then have to make subs while we always have to bring on when we are in the shit . Sure when he starts with the write formation and selections of the rest the team we mite take somebody to the cleaners ! Agreed and good luck with the grammar and spelling Police ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dandare 1966 Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 Left school when I was 13 so sorry but you got the just of it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dandare 1966 Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 Jist :laugh: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoldenBall Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 He's miles ahead of Bryan, and he's younger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tom Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 Left school when I was 13 so sorry but you got the just of it School isn't the only place you can or should learn.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oxford Red Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 Jist Do you want a third go? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dandare 1966 Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 Ok try harder from now on sir Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taylor10 Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 I always felt that Burns had the most potential out of the latest batch on youngsters to come through. Strange how he hasn't started any games as yet but genuinely believe he will achieve more than Reid and Bryan. I just think with his pace he also has trickery. It will be interesting to see how Wes developes. I certainly think we could have a fans favourite on our hands in the future. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coombsy Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 Yes start with wes Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
catcott_red1 Posted February 5, 2014 Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 We play better when both he and Barnett have come on and more importantly score goals and don't concede when they both come on. Only makes sense then to start the both of them! Drop JET, put Burns on the right and stick Baldock and Barnett up front! Play the rest of the players in their natural positions, none of this square pegs in round holes nonsense like Waggy at RWB. That's a start! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eco Posted February 5, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 5, 2014 Sounds like it was Burns night last night Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.