BRISTOL86 Posted February 8, 2014 Report Share Posted February 8, 2014 Can anyone else understand how Parish could be first choice since Cotterill came in, then immediately third choice ever since Moore arrived? Why does Moore coming in suddenly bring FF back in to the fold and see Parish unable to make the bench? My immediate thought was that either Parish threw his toys out when Moore came in and is being taught a lesson, or that Fielding did the same and said he wanted to leave if he was going to be third choice? My guess would be the latter as I can't see Parish as the type to throw a hissy fit whereas Fielding perhaps thinks he is too good to be a third choice L1 keeper? Only speculating but find it strange that as soon as a new keeper came in FF became first choice of the existing two when he'd been nowhere near the team prior to Moore's arrival. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrahamC Posted February 8, 2014 Report Share Posted February 8, 2014 It doesn't really matter, does it? The likelihood of needing to use your sub keeper is pretty remote, I guess Cotterill's thought behind it though is that a more experienced keeper is better suited to have to come into a game as a sub maybe? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickle Rick Posted February 8, 2014 Report Share Posted February 8, 2014 Going out on loan.... That's what I'm led to believe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petehinton Posted February 8, 2014 Report Share Posted February 8, 2014 Because he's the third worst keeper we have Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRISTOL86 Posted February 8, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 8, 2014 Because he's the third worst keeper we have But until Moore arrived Cotterill clearly thought he was the better of the two we had. That's kind of the point from my post. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peanut Posted February 8, 2014 Report Share Posted February 8, 2014 Parish is very much still the #2 keeper. If you have 3 keepers, and your 2nd keeper is young and could do with experience, what do you do with him? Do you put him on the bench (to never play), or do you try and send him out on loan to get that experience. If your the 3rd place keeper, you sit on the bench doing nothing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cidercity1987 Posted February 8, 2014 Report Share Posted February 8, 2014 Can anyone else understand how Parish could be first choice since Cotterill came in, then immediately third choice ever since Moore arrived? Why does Moore coming in suddenly bring FF back in to the fold and see Parish unable to make the bench? My immediate thought was that either Parish threw his toys out when Moore came in and is being taught a lesson, or that Fielding did the same and said he wanted to leave if he was going to be third choice? My guess would be the latter as I can't see Parish as the type to throw a hissy fit whereas Fielding perhaps thinks he is too good to be a third choice L1 keeper? Only speculating but find it strange that as soon as a new keeper came in FF became first choice of the existing two when he'd been nowhere near the team prior to Moore's arrival. Fielding's position on the bench hasn't changed so I don't understand how he has been 'brought back into the fold' or 'nowhere near the first team'. Think we could do without rumour mongering posts like this to be honest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRISTOL86 Posted February 8, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 8, 2014 Fielding's position on the bench hasn't changed so I don't understand how he has been 'brought back into the fold' or 'nowhere near the first team'. Think we could do without rumour mongering posts like this to be honest. Who's rumour mongering? I'm merely asking how a keeper can go from 1st choice to 3rd choice because a new #1 comes in. By first team I mean starting 11. Yes Fielding's position hasn't changed, that's my point. If you have a first choice and a second choice, and then someone better than both is brought in, you would expect your 2nd choice to become 3rd choice, no? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
biggythecity Posted February 8, 2014 Report Share Posted February 8, 2014 hes 3rd choice because he had his chance and now Fielding is 2nd in line as it should be Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cidercity1987 Posted February 8, 2014 Report Share Posted February 8, 2014 Who's rumour mongering? I'm merely asking how a keeper can go from 1st choice to 3rd choice because a new #1 comes in. By first team I mean starting 11. Yes Fielding's position hasn't changed, that's my point. If you have a first choice and a second choice, and then someone better than both is brought in, you would expect your 2nd choice to become 3rd choice, no? You implied Fielding had thrown a hissy fit and asked to leave! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dandare 1966 Posted February 8, 2014 Report Share Posted February 8, 2014 I agree, not sure Moore has been much better than Elliot . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
otib118 Posted February 8, 2014 Report Share Posted February 8, 2014 Could be that if Fielding is on the bench then that enables parish to become the U21's Keeper so his progress isn't halted by sitting on the bench? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petehinton Posted February 8, 2014 Report Share Posted February 8, 2014 I agree, not sure Moore has been much better than Elliot . It's been 2 games!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickle Rick Posted February 8, 2014 Report Share Posted February 8, 2014 It's been 2 games!!!!!!! It's otib!!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRISTOL86 Posted February 8, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 8, 2014 You implied Fielding had thrown a hissy fit and asked to leave! I wasn't implying it, I said it was a potential reason that I had thought up, made it quite clear it was just my own possible situation, not suggesting it had actually happened! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRISTOL86 Posted February 8, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 8, 2014 It's been 2 games!!!!!!! I think it's quite clear Moore is considerably better than either Parish or Fielding! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corleone Posted February 8, 2014 Report Share Posted February 8, 2014 Parrish had his chance and for me was making more mistakes than fielding did. While fielding had a howler against Bradford and looked very shaky....Parrish inability as a shot stopper is what has cost him, and let's be honest any pro keeper needs shot stopping as a basic necessity. Right decision IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedorDead BCFC Posted February 8, 2014 Report Share Posted February 8, 2014 If he threw his toys out the pram, I doubt anyone would know. His distribution was terrible so the toys wouldn't hit anything Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRISTOL86 Posted February 8, 2014 Author Report Share Posted February 8, 2014 Parrish had his chance and for me was making more mistakes than fielding did. While fielding had a howler against Bradford and looked very shaky....Parrish inability as a shot stopper is what has cost him, and let's be honest any pro keeper needs shot stopping as a basic necessity. Right decision IMO. I agree. Clearly Bradford massively knocked FFs confidence but I don't think Parish is any better all round. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CityFarAndWide Posted February 8, 2014 Report Share Posted February 8, 2014 I agree, not sure Moore has been much better than Elliot . OTIB logic 101 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ollywhyte Posted February 8, 2014 Report Share Posted February 8, 2014 Going out on loan.... That's what I'm led to believe.. Argyle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ateyomike Posted February 8, 2014 Report Share Posted February 8, 2014 have to say Moore does control his box more (no pun intended) and does get it out quickly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lack of Action Man Posted February 8, 2014 Report Share Posted February 8, 2014 [quote name="ateyomike" Moore does get it out quickly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.