Monkeh Posted March 7, 2014 Report Share Posted March 7, 2014 I doubt the owners are worried at all ! Its similar to our position in that we want to always be in debt, hence when SL donated the millions the other week he left us still 10 mil in debt, that way we don't pay tax as you cant pay tax on a loss. I suspect QPR are owned by a holding company which also owns several other companies and those said companies are making profit. Company 1,2, and 3 makes 168 million profit Company 4 (QPR) makes 170 million LOSS Holding company therfor makes a loss of 2million = no tax needed to be paid ! Its all a Tax dodge which is why these foreign millionaire's are buying up money pits ! nail, head Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
You Do The Dziekanowski Posted March 7, 2014 Report Share Posted March 7, 2014 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M_Porter Posted March 7, 2014 Report Share Posted March 7, 2014 No they neeed QPR and Caterham (F1) to lose money so their airline dosnt need to pay tax Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loderingo Posted March 7, 2014 Report Share Posted March 7, 2014 According to this Forest are also in danger of breaching FFP regulations. Penalties include fines and a transfer embargo next seasonhttp://uk.eurosport.yahoo.com/news/football-fair-play-worry-reds-131847207--sow.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CotswoldRed Posted March 7, 2014 Report Share Posted March 7, 2014 No they neeed QPR and Caterham (F1) to lose money so their airline dosnt need to pay tax How can losing money ever be an economic way of avoiding tax? The loss is always greater than the tax saved. It's tantamount to being happy with a pay reduction because you'll pay less income tax. They would be far better off if QPR were also making a profit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.