healeyred Posted July 8, 2014 Report Share Posted July 8, 2014 Fielding Ayling Osborne Williams Pack Elliott Little Cunningham Freeman Baldock Jay Emmanuel Thomas Subs New Keeper Flint Smith Reid wagstaff Burns Wilbraham Or Fielding Little Osborne Williams Cunningham Smith Pack Elliott Jet Baldock Freeman Subs New keeper Flint Reid Bryan wagstaff Burns Wilbraham Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
One BCFC Posted July 8, 2014 Report Share Posted July 8, 2014 GK: New keeper RWB: Little CB: Ayling CB: Osborne CB: Williams LWB: Cunningham CM: Elliott CM: Smith AM: Freeman CF: Emmanuel-Thomas CF: Baldock Subs: Fielding, Pack, Flint, Reid, Burns, Wagstaff, Bryan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRISTOL86 Posted July 8, 2014 Report Share Posted July 8, 2014 First team is pretty much what I was thinking but think Smith has been signed for immediate first team action! Think Baldock, JET and Freeman could be possibly one of if not the most lethal 'front three' at this level, and would expect there to be a fair bit of freedom for them to interchange positions during a game, especially Freeman and JET Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richwwtk Posted July 8, 2014 Report Share Posted July 8, 2014 Seems a little harsh to include Ayling in your first team and then not even put him on the bench for the second one! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
healeyred Posted July 8, 2014 Author Report Share Posted July 8, 2014 Forgot to put him on the bench for the second one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samo II Posted July 8, 2014 Report Share Posted July 8, 2014 Not usually prone to this, but am excited about the prospect of the season so... GK - Fielding LCB - Williams CB - Osborne RCB - Ayling LWB/M - Cunningham RWB/M - Little LCM - Freeman CM - Elliott RCM - Smith FW - Emmanuel-Thomas FW - Baldock And that is presuming we go 352, and doesn't include players I think will have important roles to play this season, such as Wagstaff, Pack, Flint, and hopefully the youth players like Burns, Bryan and Reid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UREDS_91 Posted July 8, 2014 Report Share Posted July 8, 2014 I would still like to see more of Pack this year. Can spread the ball to either side of the pitch with relative ease. Think we may see him and Smith swapping in and out of the team a bit this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WTFiGO!?! Posted July 8, 2014 Report Share Posted July 8, 2014 and would expect there to be a fair bit of freedom for them to interchange positions during a game, especially Freeman and JET Last time I saw JET he was casually interchanging with the right back. You can't tie that roaming beast down Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pickle Rick Posted July 8, 2014 Report Share Posted July 8, 2014 Fielding Little Ayling Williams Osbourne Cunningham Pack (defensive outlet) Elliott (attacking outlet) JET (free attacking role) Freeman (free attacking role) Baldock (channel runner) = a good ******* go this season. Waggy, Bryan & Reid will play diverse roles this season. Burns to offer a more attacking formation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Who Are Rovers? Posted July 8, 2014 Report Share Posted July 8, 2014 I would still like to see more of Pack this year. Can spread the ball to either side of the pitch with relative ease. Think we may see him and Smith swapping in and out of the team a bit this year. Also with Elliot aging, it is possible you will see Smith and Pack as a pair for some games, as 46 games a season for a 35 year old can be tough on the legs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
And Its Smith Posted July 8, 2014 Report Share Posted July 8, 2014 Smith will start nearly every game I reckon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thatchersgold Posted July 8, 2014 Report Share Posted July 8, 2014 got a very solid looking team this season whatever team we put out. I just hope we still see bobbie reid i think his game time could be very little Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marina's Rolls Royce Posted July 8, 2014 Report Share Posted July 8, 2014 Also with Elliot aging, it is possible you will see Smith and Pack as a pair for some games, as 46 games a season for a 35 year old can be tough on the legs. I think you would ordinarily be correct but Wade Elliot is the "duracell" in our squad. I'd back him to start most games this season and to provide that extra experience in the centre. Blimey- for ages we haven't had a midfield at all and now we've virtually got two! and the gas got relegated. What a summer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HoldenBall Posted July 8, 2014 Report Share Posted July 8, 2014 Not usually prone to this, but am excited about the prospect of the season so... GK - Fielding LCB - Williams CB - Osborne RCB - Ayling LWB/M - Cunningham RWB/M - Little LCM - Freeman CM - Elliott RCM - Smith FW - Emmanuel-Thomas FW - Baldock And that is presuming we go 352, and doesn't include players I think will have important roles to play this season, such as Wagstaff, Pack, Flint, and hopefully the youth players like Burns, Bryan and Reid. This will be the team I think, the good thing is we can easily form a 4-2-3-1, 4-4-2, 4-3-3 if we needed to. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mahatma Coate Posted July 8, 2014 Report Share Posted July 8, 2014 Ten blokes in red, one in green. Sometimes good, sometimes rubbish, often frustrating. That's what always happens, but at least we're not NLBR, 1653ers, or Horse-Punchers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.