TBW Posted December 26, 2014 Report Share Posted December 26, 2014 Not there today unfortunately, but noticed online we have six subs named... couldn't we have got a youth player on there to fill it out a bit? Or is the BBC site wrong? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BA12RED Posted December 26, 2014 Report Share Posted December 26, 2014 Wilbraham was injured during warm up... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bristolcitysweden Posted December 26, 2014 Report Share Posted December 26, 2014 Yeovil also only had six subs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedM Posted December 26, 2014 Report Share Posted December 26, 2014 Wilbraham was injured during warm up... I don't think he was, teams were named before they did the warm up! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aa_bcfc Posted December 26, 2014 Report Share Posted December 26, 2014 When we can't fill the bench you have to wonder why we have Reid and burns out on loan. Burns might well have stretched Yeovil late on with his pace even though he's no where near the finished article. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeh Posted December 26, 2014 Report Share Posted December 26, 2014 When a player gets injured in the warm up you can't add another after the team sheets go in, That's why we had 6 players on the bench Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cityexile Posted December 26, 2014 Report Share Posted December 26, 2014 ...and who would have been the 7th, if we had been able... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Monkeh Posted December 26, 2014 Report Share Posted December 26, 2014 ...and who would have been the 7th, if we had been able... Some with zero chance of coming on, All the bans and injurys have only just happened well after loan deadline day We are jus unlucky they all happened at once Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red-Robbo Posted December 26, 2014 Report Share Posted December 26, 2014 I agree with those who say, it would've been nice to have been able to bring Burns on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbored Posted December 26, 2014 Report Share Posted December 26, 2014 Don't need 6 subs anyway. 4 max is all you need, one a goalkeeper. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wayne allisons tongues Posted December 26, 2014 Report Share Posted December 26, 2014 When a player gets injured in the warm up you can't add another after the team sheets go in, That's why we had 6 players on the bench Team sheets announced at 2. Players warm up 2.15. Only 6 fit players for the bench at 2. If anyone was injured in warm up would of been 5 on bench. I think sc is stating a point to the board we need more strength in depth, that's why only 6 on bench. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stubbsy1993 Posted December 26, 2014 Report Share Posted December 26, 2014 Based on this, which of the youth players would be mature enough to take up this role if called upon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob k Posted December 26, 2014 Report Share Posted December 26, 2014 Team sheets announced at 2. Players warm up 2.15. Only 6 fit players for the bench at 2. If anyone was injured in warm up would of been 5 on bench. I think sc is stating a point to the board we need more strength in depth, that's why only 6 on bench. Without doubt this! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TBW Posted December 27, 2014 Author Report Share Posted December 27, 2014 ...and who would have been the 7th, if we had been able... Any of Morrell, Hall, Batten, Bishop, Mafuta, Fry, Lemonheigh-Evans, Horgan, Monelle, Last, Vyner? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve Watts Posted December 27, 2014 Report Share Posted December 27, 2014 Team sheets announced at 2. Players warm up 2.15. Only 6 fit players for the bench at 2. If anyone was injured in warm up would of been 5 on bench. I think sc is stating a point to the board we need more strength in depth, that's why only 6 on bench. Teams announced to the public at 2, handed in to the referee before that. And your last statement is quite frankly ridiculous with all due respect. We have a board that has already said and proven that they will back Cotts (and several previous managers). Why on earth would he feel the need to "make a point"?!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.thumb.jpg.00ace4f14b8643a4a9016cb5f194104d.jpg)
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.