cottsciderarmy Posted August 15, 2015 Report Share Posted August 15, 2015 Reporting on TV that Bolasie looks set to go to Spurs for 25M, with that means we get 3.75M from our sell on fee. I would imagine Palace will be very keen on Gayle signing for us now, can't see them wanting to miss out on 3.75m when we're willing to write it off if Gayle comes here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bris Red Posted August 15, 2015 Report Share Posted August 15, 2015 F Gayle. Take the 3.75 mill and look else where IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samo II Posted August 15, 2015 Report Share Posted August 15, 2015 Wow. Certainly explains why Palace would be wanting that 15% back... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jesus Posted August 15, 2015 Report Share Posted August 15, 2015 Where is this being reported? And do you know for a fact that we're willing to write off the sell on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cottsciderarmy Posted August 15, 2015 Author Report Share Posted August 15, 2015 Wow. Certainly explains why Palace would be wanting that 15% back... Also, why our offer for Gayle could be as much as 10M as the papers said, as 6m cash and the writing off the sell on fee makes it 9.75M. But if the lad doesn't want to come, he doesn't want to come. But 3.75M could certainly bolster our defence, and midfield and then we still have 6M to buy a marquee striker. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cottsciderarmy Posted August 15, 2015 Author Report Share Posted August 15, 2015 Where is this being reported? And do you know for a fact that we're willing to write off the sell on? Loads of London papers and Telegraph running with it, was on Sky Sports News just before kick off and was mentioned in the studio as well, Tottenham have sold someone and Bolasie is their target and 25M is the offer. No I don't know that for sure, however it's been reported in many places that we are and that constitutes the add on, as Palace was 10M, and we offered 6M plus Bolasies sell on fee, so that met Palace's demands. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cityloyal473 Posted August 15, 2015 Report Share Posted August 15, 2015 F Gayle. Take the 3.75 mill and look else where IMO. This^^ tell Gayle to go take a running jump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kezman Posted August 15, 2015 Report Share Posted August 15, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AshtonGreat Posted August 15, 2015 Report Share Posted August 15, 2015 That is a ridiculous fee for an average player Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samo II Posted August 15, 2015 Report Share Posted August 15, 2015 That is a ridiculous fee for an average player But we'll take it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simon uk Posted August 15, 2015 Report Share Posted August 15, 2015 That is a ridiculous fee for an average player If its true, that comment pretty much sums spurs up in one sentence. It would also be sufficient reason to pull the gayle offer so we can see how much that clause is worth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EstoniaTallinnRed Posted August 15, 2015 Report Share Posted August 15, 2015 Cotts said on Radio Bristol tonight that the deal was off, he doesn't want to come to us! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chairman Mao Posted August 15, 2015 Report Share Posted August 15, 2015 Cotts said on Radio Bristol tonight that the deal was off, he doesn't want to come to us! we were in for Bolasie too?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Northski Posted August 15, 2015 Report Share Posted August 15, 2015 Google maps only reckons its 16.7m Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Br1stolCityBoy Posted August 15, 2015 Report Share Posted August 15, 2015 Also, why our offer for Gayle could be as much as 10M as the papers said, as 6m cash and the writing off the sell on fee makes it 9.75M. But if the lad doesn't want to come, he doesn't want to come. But 3.75M could certainly bolster our defence, and midfield and then we still have 6M to buy a marquee striker. Agree with your comments 100%. It's a no brainer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 15, 2015 Report Share Posted August 15, 2015 Wow that would be handy for us. No way should we spend all that on gayle though with the fee and dropping the sell on clause. Only do that if lansdown gives cotteril a few million to spend on a few more players as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samo II Posted August 15, 2015 Report Share Posted August 15, 2015 Wow that would be handy for us. No way should we spend all that on gayle though with the fee and dropping the sell on clause. Only do that if lansdown gives cotteril a few million to spend on a few more players as well. We'll not be getting Gayle anyway; SC has confirmed he's not moving. No matter; we'll take those millions, and if I'm not wrong that would make us cost neutral at least on signings this summer - worse things to be with the transfer window coming to a close; might enable us to be more bold. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davefevs Posted August 15, 2015 Report Share Posted August 15, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.