Jack Dawe Posted January 25, 2016 Report Share Posted January 25, 2016 Good luck Fulham, then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Posted January 25, 2016 Report Share Posted January 25, 2016 He was decent in league one maybe we should keep him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CyderInACan Posted January 25, 2016 Report Share Posted January 25, 2016 Bearing in mind that Agard is gainfully employed as a professional footballer, I think he's only actually any good when he hasn't got the ball. Chasing, harrying, running into the channels or spaces - that's where he's OK. When he's actually GOT the ball he's rubbish. Most of his goals are deflected or miskicks. A swap deal for Mathieu would be a work of genius. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shtanley Posted January 25, 2016 Report Share Posted January 25, 2016 I would happily sell him for a reasonable price. Rather have a young player like Garita or MCCoulsky on the bench. Don't rate Agard. Sell him and find another striker, if we can't find one it wouldn't be that much of a big deal imo as I wouldn't miss Agard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrahamC Posted January 25, 2016 Report Share Posted January 25, 2016 27 minutes ago, 29AR said: I still struggle with how that could comply with the rules. The trouble I have is the rules ban paying compensation or any fee for a transfer. If you're swapping a player, even if no money has changed hands and of equal value, there is a value attributable to each transfer and one must in my simple mind be compensation for the other. But if the deal reduced their wage bill and there was no fee involved would that be acceptable under an embargo? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aaron-Bcfc Posted January 25, 2016 Report Share Posted January 25, 2016 58 minutes ago, dave36 said: Keep agard a bit longer and start him, our first division team need the confidence lifting, should be him starting and kodja on bench, at least he is likely to net a few more sitters! Dont start williams and Bryan together, williams not a team player, takes every opportunity to make Bryan look bad, only passing to him when the ball is near impossible to play! What a strange comment. Bryan often makes himself look bad when, instead of making himself available on the line, hides in the middle with no intention to make himself an option. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldstandrobin Posted January 25, 2016 Report Share Posted January 25, 2016 59 minutes ago, glos old boy said: This could have legs, liked Smith from before a battler and could finish; he`s been before and not getting much game time a Fulham. We may know in an hour, is there not a press con at 5 ? Press conf.....where ??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 25, 2016 Report Share Posted January 25, 2016 5 minutes ago, GrahamC said: But if the deal reduced their wage bill and there was no fee involved would that be acceptable under an embargo? I personally don't think so, although I'm not certain I am correct either I think that there would always be a fee involved, even in a straight swap. The fee in effect always being the other player. If us gaining Smith is not compensation for us selling Agard I don't see what else it can be. If it is that to my mind amounts to us being paid compo for Agard (just not in cash terms) which Fulham are banned from doing, I think that would be irrespective of it being an equal deal. I think the way it's worded as paying transfer fee or compensation is designed to catch this sort of deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted January 25, 2016 Report Share Posted January 25, 2016 5 minutes ago, oldstandrobin said: Press conf.....where ??? See transfer thread and Fulham reject Citys bid for Smith see link on same thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
old_eastender Posted January 25, 2016 Report Share Posted January 25, 2016 It should be remembered that Agard's best position is playing on the right of a front 3, something that was never an option under Cotts but now is. Personally I'd like to see him start in that role against Brum (presuming Mr. Ashton doesn't start earning his corn and actually brings in some new signings that is). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Im_over_ere Posted January 25, 2016 Report Share Posted January 25, 2016 I expect that Fulham would not want to sell MS to us unless the fee was absolutely ridiculous. We are in a relegation battle with them, and if the wages for MS are already committed for this year, why take the chance of selling him to us to possibly help out our lack of scoring. Fulham are also probably noticing that we have had several players reject us, so the more we struggle to get players, the better for them. Wouldn't surprise me if they agreed to sell him to us at the end of the season no matter what division we are in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fergie1919 Posted January 25, 2016 Report Share Posted January 25, 2016 Celtic are definitely not interested. Pile of rumours. They were looking for a tall frontman. He wouldn't see the light of day with the form Leigh griffiths is in Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davefevs Posted January 25, 2016 Report Share Posted January 25, 2016 1 hour ago, old_eastender said: It should be remembered that Agard's best position is playing on the right of a front 3, something that was never an option under Cotts but now is. Personally I'd like to see him start in that role against Brum (presuming Mr. Ashton doesn't start earning his corn and actually brings in some new signings that is). That is a fair shout. Would mean Wes missing out, but think Agard should get a chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fat Controller Posted January 25, 2016 Report Share Posted January 25, 2016 7 minutes ago, Davefevs said: That is a fair shout. Would mean Wes missing out, but think Agard should get a chance. Burns and Agard either side of Kodjia? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WOODSY1111 Posted January 25, 2016 Report Share Posted January 25, 2016 Believe Ross McCormack has told Fulham he wants to leave so as interest from other clubs in him wouldn't surprise me if they are looking at a cheap replacement so don't expect us to get Matt Smith in! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chairman Mao Posted January 25, 2016 Report Share Posted January 25, 2016 Bryan Gladwin Agard behind Kodjia? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColneRed Posted January 25, 2016 Report Share Posted January 25, 2016 He's pacey, scored some good goals last season, including the opener against Swindon, also impressive in last game against Walsall. We clearly don't have an embarrassment of riches so it's a bit of puzzle as to why he's not had a chance. Lots of players develop given good coaching! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivorguy Posted January 25, 2016 Report Share Posted January 25, 2016 I think Colne Red you may have answered your own question - coaching standard at City Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robin_unreliant Posted January 26, 2016 Report Share Posted January 26, 2016 Seems there were lots of posters agitating to get Wes Burns into the team. However very little noise around the lack of chances for KA. We are desperate for more goals. He did well for Rotherham out wide and while I know that was L1 I can't see why we don't try him wide right in a front 3. We seem to have jumped straight to WB in the role without trying him there. I agree Wes has done ok since he came in but KA has a track record of scoring from that position. Really think we should try starting him there and using WB as an impact sub in the last half hour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YorkshireSection Posted January 26, 2016 Report Share Posted January 26, 2016 If rumoutrs are true then we should move heaven and earth to swap Agard, one season for Rotherham and a lot of running around, dire first touch and seemingly more injured than fully fit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Garland-sweden Posted January 26, 2016 Report Share Posted January 26, 2016 Keep Agard. He will score for us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_BCFC Posted January 26, 2016 Report Share Posted January 26, 2016 Think we should keep Agard. The lad deserves a run in the side, hes a proven goal scorer, something we are lacking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.