Up The City! Posted January 22, 2017 Report Share Posted January 22, 2017 6 hours ago, 8menhadadream said: 6 hours ago, BobBobSuperBob said: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Up The City! Posted January 22, 2017 Report Share Posted January 22, 2017 1 hour ago, Portland Bill said: I would still sack him now, if it meant TA going back to Chelsea then so be it. A new manager would have a week to bring another striker in, using the obvious bottomless pit of money SL has been happy to hand out to the current manager. We do have other strikers, a tactically astute manager may even be able to get us a few 1-0 wins, by actually sending the team out with plan. At the moment TA's goals are actually winning us no points whatsoever. He's scored 18 goals in a little over half a season, if he can replicate that over a full season easily looking at 30+ So if this was a clause in no way would I sacrifice Tammy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin phantom Posted January 22, 2017 Admin Report Share Posted January 22, 2017 Time and time again we've been told THERE IS NO RECALL AVAILABLE, which part of that don't people understand? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JasonM88 Posted January 22, 2017 Report Share Posted January 22, 2017 3 minutes ago, phantom said: Time and time again we've been told THERE IS NO RECALL AVAILABLE, which part of that don't people understand? Time and time again we have been told THERES IS NO STANDARD RECALL AVALIABLE, which part of that don't people understand? If you read the thread before posting your narrow minded idiotic comments you might have already known that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Balls Posted January 22, 2017 Report Share Posted January 22, 2017 42 minutes ago, Mr Hankey said: An extremely bizzare clause to put in any contract/loan and one i dont believe would have been discussed even for a second. One that is more likely i would believe is if we are in the bottom 3 halfway through the season, much like why Izzy Brown was recalled from Rotherham and sent to a team chasing promo in Hudds.... That sounds like a "non-standard" recall clause to me. If the same exists for Tammy, even more reason to dispense with LJ before he drops us into the bottom 3 and we risk losing Tammy to some team in the top half of the table! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Hankey Posted January 22, 2017 Report Share Posted January 22, 2017 6 minutes ago, Dr Balls said: That sounds like a "non-standard" recall clause to me. If the same exists for Tammy, even more reason to dispense with LJ before he drops us into the bottom 3 and we risk losing Tammy to some team in the top half of the table! Exactly, hopefully tomorrow is the day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T R Posted January 22, 2017 Report Share Posted January 22, 2017 35 minutes ago, Up The City! said: He's scored 18 goals in a little over half a season, if he can replicate that over a full season easily looking at 30+ So if this was a clause in no way would I sacrifice Tammy. Call me old fashioned but I expect him to score 2-3 goals each game with the chances he gets. So on that reason I will give him a kick up the ass. As for lee johnson he probably will be our best manager this club has seen for a long time, that's if you guys will give him a chance. P.S. yes I'm on the vintage cider, this might explain my craziness Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobBobSuperBob Posted January 22, 2017 Report Share Posted January 22, 2017 3 minutes ago, Threshing Red said: Call me old fashioned but I expect him to score 2-3 goals each game with the chances he gets. So on that reason I will give him a kick up the ass. As for lee johnson he probably will be our best manager this club has seen for a long time, that's if you guys will give him a chance. P.S. yes I'm on the vintage cider, this might explain my craziness I can understand you're thinking Tammy does what he should be doing , scores hat trick (minimum) each game We sneak in the play offs and romp the Play Off Final as Tammy has an 'above average' day and nets all 5 against Derby Lee is proved to be the best manager seen at the Club for ages , and girls and boys there will be another bedtime story tomorrow night from ' Alcohol induced Bedtime Fantasies' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin phantom Posted January 22, 2017 Admin Report Share Posted January 22, 2017 41 minutes ago, JasonM88 said: Time and time again we have been told THERES IS NO STANDARD RECALL AVALIABLE, which part of that don't people understand? If you read the thread before posting your narrow minded idiotic comments you might have already known that. Wow! So why are people discussing the possibility of a recall when it's clear there isn't one? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alan Dicks' Barmy Army Posted January 22, 2017 Report Share Posted January 22, 2017 44 minutes ago, JasonM88 said: If you read the thread before posting your narrow minded idiotic comments you might have already known that. Only one idiot posted in this thread and it's not Phantom Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xiled Posted January 22, 2017 Report Share Posted January 22, 2017 2 hours ago, Olé said: I feel the same way as most of the responses by the way, it just has me wondering if we may not see anything happen this week after all - waiting for the transfer window to close would reduce the scope to recall and re-loan the player, if such a term existed. I think there are two more likely reasons why we won't see a managerial change until February: We aren't in the relegation spots (yet) so I think it's likely that LJ will be given every possible chance to get the team winning until it's clear that we are heading down. When we're in the bottom three, the City board will have to take action. After the club signed 4 players in January, the board will not want managerial applicants who think they have time (and money) to bring in further players. Appointing a new manager in February will give us a shortlist of managers prepared to work with the existing squad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WhistleHappy Posted January 22, 2017 Report Share Posted January 22, 2017 2 hours ago, Davefevs said: Got to be something like that. ...................... No way was it 'play every game'. ....or climb every frigging mountain! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JasonM88 Posted January 22, 2017 Report Share Posted January 22, 2017 38 minutes ago, phantom said: Wow! So why are people discussing the possibility of a recall when it's clear there isn't one? It's clear there's certain stipulations we have to keep to, in terms of keeping Tammy. The point of this thread is exploring whether Johnson staying is one of those stipulations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rascal Posted January 22, 2017 Report Share Posted January 22, 2017 He would be absolutely amazing for us with the amount of chances we create. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Up The City! Posted January 22, 2017 Report Share Posted January 22, 2017 51 minutes ago, BobBobSuperBob said: I can understand you're thinking Tammy does what he should be doing , scores hat trick (minimum) each game We sneak in the play offs and romp the Play Off Final as Tammy has an 'above average' day and nets all 5 against Derby Lee is proved to be the best manager seen at the Club for ages , and girls and boys there will be another bedtime story tomorrow night from ' Alcohol induced Bedtime Fantasies' I'm pleased your also in the same 'always believe' camp as me. Something strange is going on today, I find myself agreeing with many of your posts. This one being the most agreeable one yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobBobSuperBob Posted January 22, 2017 Report Share Posted January 22, 2017 9 minutes ago, Rascal said: He would be absolutely amazing for us with the amount of chances we create. No he's rubbish mate - honestly , couldn't hit a barn door etc His goals are rubbish , you know boring volleys from 10 yards out - really boring I might be his first taste of senior football but he needs to man up Besides boring goals he's not fast enough, strong enough , doesn't get many headed goals ... I could go on ... At just turned 19 he should be ashamed of his contribution He needs a good old kick up the arse Forget about him Hes rubbish and the root of our problems Over rated Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rascal Posted January 22, 2017 Report Share Posted January 22, 2017 Hahahaha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benjam!n Ultra Posted January 23, 2017 Report Share Posted January 23, 2017 I am not sure Chelsea have ever entered a clause like this into a loan deal so not sure why they'd start with Tammy, who if recalled would be behind around £100m of talent in the pecking order. The only terms would have been appearances and that isn't going to be an issue. But if this fantasy condition was correct I would still sack LJ, Tammy's goals haven't won us a single point in this run and something needs to change. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlie BCFC Posted January 23, 2017 Report Share Posted January 23, 2017 Wouldn't have thought so Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesBCFC Posted January 23, 2017 Report Share Posted January 23, 2017 11 hours ago, Portland Bill said: I think it was a case of he must play as a centre forward. Why else would LJ have put a 20 goal striker ( Kodjia ) on the left or right wing at the start of the season? Because Kodjia is a striker OR winger? He had played many games as a winger before he joined us and wasn't being shoved out of position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.