Rocking Red Cyril Posted February 3, 2017 Report Share Posted February 3, 2017 So if the FA are looking into the Taylor signing are we allowed to play him on sat. ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cider-Head23 Posted February 3, 2017 Report Share Posted February 3, 2017 Course we are, How can we possibly of done anything wrong, Taylor's release clause has been in the public domain for weeks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red-Robbo Posted February 3, 2017 Report Share Posted February 3, 2017 Yes. Even if they decided there was a breach of the confidentiality clause in his contract, it would be a case of compensation, not a cancellation of the whole move. Of course, that ain't gonna happen... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Port Said Red Posted February 3, 2017 Report Share Posted February 3, 2017 3 minutes ago, Rocking Red Cyril said: So if the FA are looking into the Taylor signing are we allowed to play him on sat. ? Of course, the last decision they are going to make is that we have to give him back. I think it will be thrown out as soon as they review it anyway, unless of course there is something we haven't been told (e.g. the buyout clause was not £300k, but we still matched whatever it was). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocking Red Cyril Posted February 3, 2017 Author Report Share Posted February 3, 2017 Ok gr8 got city to whom Taylor to score with bookies, shit odds mind Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bristolcitysweden Posted February 3, 2017 Report Share Posted February 3, 2017 We will start with Abraham & Wilbraham anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
handsofclay Posted February 3, 2017 Report Share Posted February 3, 2017 The worst punishment they can apply is to make us close the top tier of the Lansdown Stand for a few matches and to play a preseason friendly with a couple of stands closed. Of course, the EFL, thanks to the media and social media, know we do that already and have known for months, just like we knew about Taylor's situation for months thanks to the media and social media etc. So the punishment will fit the crime. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocking Red Cyril Posted February 3, 2017 Author Report Share Posted February 3, 2017 2 minutes ago, bristolcitysweden said: We will start with Abraham & Wilbraham anyway With both djuric and Taylor on the bench ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCFChris Posted February 3, 2017 Report Share Posted February 3, 2017 We just blame HarleyGas from Slag Chat if anything comes of it. Apparently he spilled the beans back in December. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bristolcitysweden Posted February 3, 2017 Report Share Posted February 3, 2017 1 minute ago, Rocking Red Cyril said: With both djuric and Taylor on the bench ? Would be my pick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iron Acton Red Posted February 3, 2017 Report Share Posted February 3, 2017 1 minute ago, Rocking Red Cyril said: With both djuric and Taylor on the bench ? Thinking the same,Taylor will come on in second half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davefevs Posted February 3, 2017 Report Share Posted February 3, 2017 I see the only person / people at fault are Taylor himself, his agent or Rovers. They were the only parties who knew about the clause. For City to have got the info, one of those must've blabbed. Surely that's the black and white of it. Assuming it was Taylor or his Agent, then you could reasonably expect Rovers to be unhappy and want to try and get some compensation....but not from City. I'm obviously no legal expert, but I can't see his City themselves have done anything wrong. So any investigation must be between Rovers and Taylor/Agent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fordy62 Posted February 3, 2017 Report Share Posted February 3, 2017 If I had a release clause from WMP, I'd be telling all and sundry about it if it got me a better move. I surely can't see that it'd ever be confidential. By the way everyone I don't. Just a 28 days notice period. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Antman Posted February 3, 2017 Report Share Posted February 3, 2017 does this mean that Engvall won't even make the bench ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocking Red Cyril Posted February 3, 2017 Author Report Share Posted February 3, 2017 Is not Taylor's agents a buddy of SL ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bristolcitysweden Posted February 3, 2017 Report Share Posted February 3, 2017 2 minutes ago, Davefevs said: I see the only person / people at fault are Taylor himself, his agent or Rovers. They were the only parties who knew about the clause. For City to have got the info, one of those must've blabbed. Surely that's the black and white of it. Assuming it was Taylor or his Agent, then you could reasonably expect Rovers to be unhappy and want to try and get some compensation....but not from City. I'm obviously no legal expert, but I can't see his City themselves have done anything wrong. So any investigation must be between Rovers and Taylor/Agent. Agree as long as there is no rule saying you are not allowed to take advantage of "unlegal" information, meaning other information than given by the parent club. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bristolcitysweden Posted February 3, 2017 Report Share Posted February 3, 2017 3 minutes ago, Fordy62 said: If I had a release clause from WMP, I'd be telling all and sundry about it if it got me a better move. I surely can't see that it'd ever be confidential. By the way everyone I don't. Just a 28 days notice period. The point of it is that the release clause can be triggered hence public information. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 3, 2017 Report Share Posted February 3, 2017 19 minutes ago, Red-Robbo said: Yes. Even if they decided there was a breach of the confidentiality clause in his contract, it would be a case of compensation, not a cancellation of the whole move. Of course, that ain't gonna happen... Not sure there'd be compensation. How can there be? He had a release clause and that's what they got - how can they say they suffered loss? A fine, embargo potentially (unlikely imo), compensation; can't see it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bristolcitysweden Posted February 3, 2017 Report Share Posted February 3, 2017 He is as us much gas as FGR. What comes around goes around. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocking Red Cyril Posted February 3, 2017 Author Report Share Posted February 3, 2017 8 minutes ago, Antman said: does this mean that Engvall won't even make the bench ! Yes, maybe he just makes the tea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red-Robbo Posted February 3, 2017 Report Share Posted February 3, 2017 Just now, 29AR said: Not sure there'd be compensation. How can there be? He had a release clause and that's what they got - how can they say they suffered loss? A fine, embargo potentially (unlikely imo), compensation; can't see it. Against the leaker, should it be MT or his agent. The club would only be hit with something if it was somehow proved that we used some sort of hacking/industrial espionage to obtain the contract details. Which seeing it was mentioned on social media months before, and in the national press on a number of occasions, they clearly didn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bristolcitysweden Posted February 3, 2017 Report Share Posted February 3, 2017 17 minutes ago, Antman said: does this mean that Engvall won't even make the bench ! His market value is closing in on £195,000. A tenth of what he was bought for add ons excluded. And the answer is; Sugar dad is paying. PAPPA BETALAR Check ELON-STHLM on the link http://www.elon.se/mer-om-oss/vara-reklamfilmer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bar BS3 Posted February 3, 2017 Report Share Posted February 3, 2017 It doesn't matter who's friends with who or what people had actually seen the contract. The info has been out in the public domain via the media for weeks/months, prior to us putting a bid in to Rovers last Sunday. It's a complete non-storey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrahamC Posted February 3, 2017 Report Share Posted February 3, 2017 25 minutes ago, Antman said: does this mean that Engvall won't even make the bench ! Seeing as he didn't make the bench in midweek when Taylor wasn't even available I'd say that was a certainty. I expect Taylor to be a sub but Djuric to come in to partner Tammy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
londonrobins Posted February 3, 2017 Report Share Posted February 3, 2017 28 minutes ago, Antman said: does this mean that Engvall won't even make the bench ! Yeah a bit of a waste of a signing in the summer to be honest. How many matches has he actually played? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red-Robbo Posted February 3, 2017 Report Share Posted February 3, 2017 9 minutes ago, bristolcitysweden said: His market value is closing in on £195,000. A tenth of what he was bought for add ons excluded. And the answer is; Sugar dad is paying. PAPPA BETALAR Check ELON-STHLM on the link http://www.elon.se/mer-om-oss/vara-reklamfilmer His sugar daddy is Pat Benatar! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BanburyRed Posted February 3, 2017 Report Share Posted February 3, 2017 I love the idea that the FA might find something wrong, like we haven't dotted an i or crossed a t, or perish the thought, not used some correct punctuation in the contract....punishment? Loan him back to the slags for a month! Laugh? I wouldn't know when to stop! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tinman85 Posted February 3, 2017 Report Share Posted February 3, 2017 59 minutes ago, FramptonRed said: Thinking the same,Taylor will come on in second half. Kidding me surely? Though with Johnson who knows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Major Isewater Posted February 3, 2017 Report Share Posted February 3, 2017 27 minutes ago, Red-Robbo said: His sugar daddy is Pat Benatar! He's a woman . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red-Robbo Posted February 3, 2017 Report Share Posted February 3, 2017 Just now, Major Isewater said: He's a woman . No wonder we're not playing him! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.