BobBobSuperBob Posted March 8, 2017 Report Share Posted March 8, 2017 Just now, Marina's Rolls Royce said: TFFT Bob- I knew you didn't make it up as you go along in a populist Simpsons crowd type way! You've never been the same since you swooned over meeting Cotts have you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marina's Rolls Royce Posted March 8, 2017 Report Share Posted March 8, 2017 3 minutes ago, BobBobSuperBob said: You've never been the same since you swooned over meeting Cotts have you You can do better than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobBobSuperBob Posted March 8, 2017 Report Share Posted March 8, 2017 3 minutes ago, Marina's Rolls Royce said: You can do better than that. I did - in your 'challenge' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marina's Rolls Royce Posted March 8, 2017 Report Share Posted March 8, 2017 1 minute ago, BobBobSuperBob said: I did - in your 'challenge' I'm still waiting..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobBobSuperBob Posted March 8, 2017 Report Share Posted March 8, 2017 1 minute ago, Marina's Rolls Royce said: I'm still waiting..... Not difficult scroll up You of the Populist Swallow Club Bullshit crowd type of way Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamsober Posted March 8, 2017 Report Share Posted March 8, 2017 32 minutes ago, BobBobSuperBob said: you asked On Thread 'Steve Lansdown Puppet' On speculation of Johnsons Appointment and Superfan having a misguided go too ROFLMAO Yes I remember now - but changed mind since! But you are pretty sad to go back to his day of appointment - nothing else to do? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobBobSuperBob Posted March 8, 2017 Report Share Posted March 8, 2017 14 minutes ago, iamsober said: Yes I remember now - but changed mind since! But you are pretty sad to go back to his day of appointment - nothing else to do? No - I was surprised at the hypocricy - you then 'challenged' me to quote you , and I did dont see your issue So just to clarify you did think he was Lansdown puppet , but now you don't ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamsober Posted March 8, 2017 Report Share Posted March 8, 2017 3 minutes ago, BobBobSuperBob said: No - I was surprised at the hypocricy - you then 'challenged' me to quote you , and I did dont see your issue So just to clarify you did think he was Lansdown puppet , but now you don't ? exactly Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobBobSuperBob Posted March 8, 2017 Report Share Posted March 8, 2017 1 minute ago, iamsober said: exactly Out of interest - any particular reason ? A strange change , in the circumstances Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamsober Posted March 8, 2017 Report Share Posted March 8, 2017 3 minutes ago, BobBobSuperBob said: a weekOut of interest - any particular reason ? A strange change , in the circumstances as I said earlier I really don't care about the manager they come and go and get rewarded when sacked. Its the overpaid players that concern me which is different when we had local lads in the side that were earning £100 a week, matt hill as an example Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobBobSuperBob Posted March 8, 2017 Report Share Posted March 8, 2017 1 minute ago, iamsober said: as I said earlier I really don't care about the manager they come and go and get rewarded when sacked. Its the overpaid players that concern me which is different when we had local lads in the side that were earning £100 matt hill as an example Ok but that wasn't my question Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamsober Posted March 8, 2017 Report Share Posted March 8, 2017 2 minutes ago, BobBobSuperBob said: Ok but that wasn't my question what do you mean a weekOut of interest? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobBobSuperBob Posted March 8, 2017 Report Share Posted March 8, 2017 1 minute ago, iamsober said: what do you mean a weekOut of interest? Because as I said , it's an interesting change - I assumed you had a reason Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iamsober Posted March 8, 2017 Report Share Posted March 8, 2017 1 minute ago, BobBobSuperBob said: Because as I said , it's an interesting change - I assumed you had a reason Yes mainly because of those fans including my children(adults now) and others relatives who want Johnson out. Whatever happens he gets the shite regardless of his boss mark Ashton and others. Hence my change. You have to admit at the beginning of the season some were even talking about premiership after a few games. I never thought that but there are things that go on behind the scenes that we know nothing about that have an effect one way or the other. I still put the blame clearly on the players but football doesn't work that way Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobBobSuperBob Posted March 8, 2017 Report Share Posted March 8, 2017 9 minutes ago, iamsober said: Yes mainly because of those fans including my children(adults now) and others relatives who want Johnson out. Whatever happens he gets the shite regardless of his boss mark Ashton and others. Hence my change. You have to admit at the beginning of the season some were even talking about premiership after a few games. I never thought that but there are things that go on behind the scenes that we know nothing about that have an effect one way or the other. I still put the blame clearly on the players but football doesn't work that way Ohhh ok Fair enough. - we disagree but at least you have some reasons / opinions which is more than the vast majority of LJ supporters So you going for MA now rather than SL & LJ ? ( Who knows you may be right ) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juan Domingo Roldan Posted March 9, 2017 Report Share Posted March 9, 2017 On Wednesday, March 08, 2017 at 07:54, JamesBCFC said: Where did I say anything suggesting Johnson shouldn't have been sacked? Nothing hypocritical about my post or any double standards there as I wasn't saying one should go and the other should stay. Maybe try reading what I actually posted, instead of reading what you wanted to read in order to throw a weak insult around. You just don't get it do you? LJ in my book is the biggest problem of all. Irrespective of whether Pembo is part of the problem fact is, logic normally entails that the bigger problem should go first. All associated dross normally follows thereafter. Now, if you didn't like my original post then you didn't have to respond. It is just my view. No need to engage in further unnecessary twaddle. Simple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JamesBCFC Posted March 9, 2017 Report Share Posted March 9, 2017 14 minutes ago, Juan Domingo Roldan said: You just don't get it do you? LJ in my book is the biggest problem of all. Irrespective of whether Pembo is part of the problem fact is, logic normally entails that the bigger problem should go first. All associated dross normally follows thereafter. Now, if you didn't like my original post then you didn't have to respond. It is just my view. No need to engage in further unnecessary twaddle. Simple. This a forum, a place for opinions to be debated and challenged. If you dont like that then I suggest a public forum isnt the place to air your concerns. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juan Domingo Roldan Posted March 10, 2017 Report Share Posted March 10, 2017 On Wednesday, March 08, 2017 at 07:54, JamesBCFC said: Where did I say anything suggesting Johnson shouldn't have been sacked? Nothing hypocritical about my post or any double standards there as I wasn't saying one should go and the other should stay. Maybe try reading what I actually posted, instead of reading what you wanted to read in order to throw a weak insult around. You just don't get it do you? LJ in my book is the biggest problem of all. Irrespective of whether Pembo is part of the problem fact is, logic normally entails that the bigger problem should go first. All associated dross normally follows thereafter. Now, if you didn't like my original post then you didn't have to respond. It is just my view. No need to engage in further unnecessary twaddle. Simple. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.