Alex_BCFC Posted January 28, 2018 Report Share Posted January 28, 2018 I would appeal because he will be out for 3 games anyway. We will have to cope and also if he is out for an extra game then it will help his injury. I also think it was probably a yellow more than red. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AppyDAZE Posted January 28, 2018 Report Share Posted January 28, 2018 Don't know if it's been said but he won't get an extra game cos the red is defo contentious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fat Controller Posted January 28, 2018 Report Share Posted January 28, 2018 I'd be looking at bringing an extra player on loan in. Probably a RB. Then Wright can play CB. That way if he's out for any number of games regardless of appeal we have some cover. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ashtonphil mk2 Posted January 28, 2018 Report Share Posted January 28, 2018 In my opinion I’d appeal based on the Fulham incident . The reaction of Bailey got that overturned the same would apply here. I had a feeling he’d send him off given his previous and the fact that he’s just comeback from a ban. It was a “look at me I’m back” decision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Midred Posted January 28, 2018 Report Share Posted January 28, 2018 6 minutes ago, ashtonphil mk2 said: In my opinion I’d appeal based on the Fulham incident . The reaction of Bailey got that overturned the same would apply here. I had a feeling he’d send him off given his previous and the fact that he’s just comeback from a ban. It was a “look at me I’m back” decision. Can referees be banned? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ashtonphil mk2 Posted January 28, 2018 Report Share Posted January 28, 2018 They get rested or relieved of their duties or not assigned a fixture. If he never refs City again I will be a happy man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cityexile Posted January 28, 2018 Report Share Posted January 28, 2018 I think it was a red but I would still Appeal. It is not so clear cut to be ‘frivolous’ in my view, and if we get some of those ex player types on the panel who were sure it was a yellow, who knows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ashtonphil mk2 Posted January 28, 2018 Report Share Posted January 28, 2018 Didn’t Phil Thompson say on Sky Sports News that it was a joke decision... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lrrr Posted January 28, 2018 Report Share Posted January 28, 2018 2 hours ago, 1960maaan said: Yeovil lad had his extended to 5 games as deemed frivolous . I thought straight red was automatic 3 games. You can't tell how they are going to receive an appeal. On our side would be clips of several experts and Holloway saying yellow and as such shouldn't be considered frivolous . But he did leave the ground, and as I said you jut can't tell how they'll react. Toss up , 0 games or 5 games missed. I'm leaning slightly toward appeal. Professional fouls are only 1 match, like Frankie's red. I would appeal as I don't think it could be deemed a frivolous appeal so we shouldn't be looking at an extra game if its unsuccessful and given how split people's opinions are it including pundits etc then we may have a chance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeAman08 Posted January 28, 2018 Report Share Posted January 28, 2018 3 hours ago, Silvio Dante said: I said on the other thread that if we all agree it was a foul and pretty much all agree it was a yellow, the chances of getting it overturned on the basis of “it wasn’t that bad” are slim. I think we’d have a fair chance of it being classed as frivolous and as such get given an extra game. Dont appeal and hope it’s a one game ban for a foul rather than a 3 game for serious foul play Basically this. Everyone agrees it is at least a yellow. Plus he has that scissor look to his legs when he goes in. As it stands he will miss two bottom clubs and a faltering leeds side and back for a high flying Fulham. I say take our chances in the next 3 knowing he will be back for our next hardest match imo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
And Its Smith Posted January 28, 2018 Report Share Posted January 28, 2018 29 minutes ago, ashtonphil mk2 said: Didn’t Phil Thompson say on Sky Sports News that it was a joke decision... He is a joke pundit. I think nowadays it is just about a red but I would appeal anyway. It certainly wont be classed as frivolous so made not to appeal. He is a vital player for us Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ivanhoe Posted January 28, 2018 Report Share Posted January 28, 2018 Borderline as was Danny Baath's. Doesn't seem much point in appealing these decisions as basically the referee has got to admit he made a mistake and they don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
italian dave Posted January 28, 2018 Report Share Posted January 28, 2018 Phil Thompson and Ian Holloway - the voices of reason...??????????? Wouldn't appeal based on that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Major Isewater Posted January 28, 2018 Report Share Posted January 28, 2018 6 hours ago, marmite said: In my opinion the only reason it was a red and not a yellow was their players reaction. Rolling around in agony, long session with the trainer, back on and running in on goal within 2 minutes. Yes it was a foul and a def yellow but talk about exaggeration from their player. Disgraceful. Maybe the appeals committee wont see it my way though. Also the difference in build Bakes running at top speed towards a littl'un looks terrifying even when there was no malice in the tackle. I think Baker was a bit rash but the challenge was nowhere near as bad as some people and that cheat Scowen made out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Ian M Posted January 28, 2018 Admin Report Share Posted January 28, 2018 As this is deemed a yellow card I would definitely appeal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lrrr Posted January 28, 2018 Report Share Posted January 28, 2018 Worst part being Bennett only gets a 1 game ban which can't be extended because the ref awarded a yellow! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marmite Posted January 28, 2018 Report Share Posted January 28, 2018 2 hours ago, Ian M said: As this is deemed a yellow card I would definitely appeal Made me wince when I watched it live. Can,t believe it was only a yellow. How many officials are there now at games. 4 minimum and he got away with a leg breaker. No intent at all in going for the ball. Bet Warnock didn't see it. Am I right in thinking as he got a yellow it can't be reviewed? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aizoon Posted January 28, 2018 Report Share Posted January 28, 2018 Just show that Cardiff "yellow" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbored Posted January 28, 2018 Report Share Posted January 28, 2018 LJ explained post match that they'd have to look at it carefully before deciding whether to appeal or not. Theres a risk of a further one match ban should the appeal be rejected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redapple Posted January 28, 2018 Report Share Posted January 28, 2018 10 hours ago, simon uk said: We are obviously biased here folks, that tackle at face value for a neutral is definitely running the risk if a red,,, he wasnt fully in control of what he was doing and could have been a leg breaker if the connection was a fraction out... we ought to be asking baker why he committed to that challenge in a position on the pitch where it wasn’t necessary, rather than query why the ref gave it. Agree, but worth the appeal still. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.