Jump to content
IGNORED

Pardew sacked


BanburyRed

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Dr Balls said:

Why bother? They are going down whatever. Another Chinese-owned West Midlands club with 3 managers in one season, after Birmingham last year. But even Harry & Cotts can't do the Houdini act in successive seasons!

Why did they sack Pulis... chronic misunderstanding of the basics of football, again, by the worthless Chinese misfits... gotta laugh and feel sorry for the Baggies fans, who are permanent, while the Orientals without a clue, when bored will offload and run back tail between legs to their Hagley Road Balti House... as odd as that sounds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure why they would sack him now as there going down either way. I know he was only meant to be there till the end of the season but surly they would of kept him on in the championship. Didn't he get Reading promotion and reached play offs following season and West Ham promotion?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, RiverRed said:

And you can bet he'll be back in a Prem job soon, because that's how it works these days. 

 

4 minutes ago, Pezo said:

I don't think he will this time, he has had to many chances. 

Hughes managed to blag the Saints job after leaving stoke in poo. Saints haven’t improved one bit. Pardew again has done nowt since arriving at Brum. Some of these managers just need to retire imo the way they want their teams to play are outdated and don’t work. Either drop down a League or walk away and learn new techniques 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, havanatopia said:

Why did they sack Pulis... chronic misunderstanding of the basics of football, again, by the worthless Chinese misfits... gotta laugh and feel sorry for the Baggies fans, who are permanent, while the Orientals without a clue, when bored will offload and run back tail between legs to their Hagley Road Balti House... as odd as that sounds.

More likely one of the casinos on the Hagley Road than a Balti House! Which is pretty much how they seem to view football ownership and management - keep turning the wheel in the hope that "Red Dragon 4", or as he is known in South Wales "Colin", turns up!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, havanatopia said:

Why did they sack Pulis... chronic misunderstanding of the basics of football, again, by the worthless Chinese misfits... gotta laugh and feel sorry for the Baggies fans, who are permanent, while the Orientals without a clue, when bored will offload and run back tail between legs to their Hagley Road Balti House... as odd as that sounds.

They sacked Pulis because their form over an extended period including the second half of last season was pretty dreadful.

He also ran up a bill in fees, loan fees and wages that has messed up their finances.

He was a big spender at Stoke too but people didn't notice. Not quite the shoestring manager he is portrayed as.

That's without mentioning what happened at Palace.

Mind you, if Pardew is the answer someone is asking the wrong question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, RiverRed said:

And you can bet he'll be back in a Prem job soon, because that's how it works these days. 

Probably be handed to a bigger club too. Sam Allardyce went from West Ham to Sunderland to Palace to England then to Everton. Keep a few teams up and you get the England job. Then when disgraced from that get one of the biggest clubs outside the top 6. Mark Hughes who got money to spend for Stoke and took them to a season in the bottom 3-4. He got an arguably bigger club in Southampton who he is now looking like not improving. Funny how it works. Might even get Derby if they don’t make playoffs because they’ll probably sack Rowett in that case. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, chinapig said:

They sacked Pulis because their form over an extended period including the second half of last season was pretty dreadful.

He also ran up a bill in fees, loan fees and wages that has messed up their finances.

He was a big spender at Stoke too but people didn't notice. Not quite the shoestring manager he is portrayed as.

That's without mentioning what happened at Palace.

Mind you, if Pardew is the answer someone is asking the wrong question.

Agreeing with lots you’re writing today

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Super said:

Mcinnes is usually linked with them maybe its his time.

Think he was linked when Pulis went. If he didn’t want the Rangers job can’t see him wanting this

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Davefevs said:

Thought this was a bumped post of a bumped post of a bumped post from an old thread :P

No, just cut and paste from the last time ( and ready for the next) ! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...