Riaz Posted August 2, 2004 Report Share Posted August 2, 2004 Murray willing be to revert back to his old role of right back if asked! Personally I think Jamie Smith Looked impressive and Murray should only go right back in emergencys. Also new WBA signings Kanu & Gera will not be playing on Tuesday nite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TinmansCulturedLeftPeg Posted August 2, 2004 Report Share Posted August 2, 2004 wouldn't suprise me if Tinman asks our flying Scotsman to play right back because Tins only wants attacking football Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest simmos the gaffer Posted August 2, 2004 Report Share Posted August 2, 2004 Thats alright if he's playing wing back in a 5-3-2 but would be a waste, and possibly a bit dodgy, if its in a flat back 4. Can't see it myself, especially as he has been playing up front in all the friendlies!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest TinmansCulturedLeftPeg Posted August 2, 2004 Report Share Posted August 2, 2004 Yeah but Murray and Bell were the full backs in a back four when we got promoted under John Ward....your not the gaffer so its not upto you matey....Tinman wants to be positive mate and you cant get much more positive than having Murray and Bell as attacking full backs with other attackers in front of them!! would be exciting stuff methinks...but in reality maybe Smith because he can still get forward abit it looks like anyway... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Pjj171086 Posted August 2, 2004 Report Share Posted August 2, 2004 I doubt it ! Tins doesn't seem keen to play many people out of position and I think we will probably sign Jamie Smith anyway and he will play against Torquay ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrahamC Posted August 2, 2004 Report Share Posted August 2, 2004 Yeah but Murray and Bell were the full backs in a back four when we got promoted under John Ward....your not the gaffer so its not upto you matey....Tinman wants to be positive mate and you cant get much more positive than having Murray and Bell as attacking full backs with other attackers in front of them!! would be exciting stuff methinks...but in reality maybe Smith because he can still get forward abit it looks like anyway... ← Adam Locke was the right back in the promotion team. Murray played on the right wing in place of Greg Goodridge sometimes but was more often a sub. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest simmos the gaffer Posted August 2, 2004 Report Share Posted August 2, 2004 Yeah but Murray and Bell were the full backs in a back four when we got promoted under John Ward....your not the gaffer so its not upto you matey....Tinman wants to be positive mate and you cant get much more positive than having Murray and Bell as attacking full backs with other attackers in front of them!! would be exciting stuff methinks...but in reality maybe Smith because he can still get forward abit it looks like anyway... ← Calm down... I think you'll find that Murray only played as a wing back and definitely not as a full back in a flat back 4. Why would Tins want to waste the chance of 15 goals plus numerous chances for others by playing Scotty at FB. I'm a great believer in playing players in rightful positions where they are most comfortable and can do their best for the team, unless there is an emergency (although with 5 subs thats unlikely to occur too often!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbored Posted August 2, 2004 Report Share Posted August 2, 2004 Murrays brief outings at full back have proved a disater in the past.To put it simply,Murray can't defend..He's far more use to the team as an attacking force. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCFC_Dan Posted August 2, 2004 Report Share Posted August 2, 2004 Murray played as a full back towards the start of the division 1 season, with the mighty Greg Goodridge in front of him. Our defence was shocking, but since it also contained Julian Watts, I don't think all of the blame can be placed on Scotty - and he was still better than Clemens Zwijnenberg! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bristol Boy Posted August 2, 2004 Report Share Posted August 2, 2004 Yeah but Murray and Bell were the full backs in a back four when we got promoted under John Ward....your not the gaffer so its not upto you matey....Tinman wants to be positive mate and you cant get much more positive than having Murray and Bell as attacking full backs with other attackers in front of them!! would be exciting stuff methinks...but in reality maybe Smith because he can still get forward abit it looks like anyway... ← Try Bell & Adam Locke. Murray was in and out on th right wing/right wing back and Greg Goodridge was often preffered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taz Posted August 2, 2004 Report Share Posted August 2, 2004 Whilst it's always good to hear a player saying that he doesn't mind playing a certain position if the need arises, I hope that this does not happen. Murray is an attack minded player, that hasn't played in the right back position since 98/99 (his words). I hope that we sign Jamie Smith before the Torquay game. Looked good on the attack, and didn't seem to bad defensively either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cider Army Posted August 2, 2004 Report Share Posted August 2, 2004 anyway we will be signing smithy this week,theres no way murray will be playing full back,he looks on form at the mo,watch out torquay. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbored Posted August 2, 2004 Report Share Posted August 2, 2004 I've seen the article and it looks a page filler to me.Murray is on the main site saying he wants to score some more goals for City and in the EP he's willing to play at full back. Something doesn't add up.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.