Jump to content
IGNORED

Steven Gerrard


Rocky

Recommended Posts

Feel like a weight has been lifted with that news. Would have been nice to have a high profile like Stevie G in BS3, but it’s still a massive risk and one we don’t necessarily need to make.

Hughton is proven and is what we need, currently. Fingers crossed we can get him in!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JonDolman said:

I bet there's other big name ex players who have done as well or even better than Gerrard so I wonder if a big name ex player is what they are looking for.

Why would they make that a policy mate? The best managers were not great players. But of course we are talking about Steve Lansdown who generally goes for under-qualified people ie. managers who have not taken a team to the Premiership.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bazooka Joe said:

If Gerrard has turned us down, that's a win for us.

Now let's get on with bringing in the right man.

Strange "win". You identify your number 1 target and he rejects you? 

That's rejection and a defeat. But you roll with the punches and move onto your next target.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Kid in the Riot said:

Pretty confident a deal with him is "oven-ready" and so barring any slip-ups or ******* Poch agreeing to join us, Hoots must be next inline. 

At least Johnson isn't negotiating this one :fear:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, BRISTOL86 said:

If we miss out on Hughton, a proven winner at this level, because we fannied about trying to poach a completely unproven Gerrard, it will be the most Bristol City thing ever. 

And let's be honest, not surprising in the slightest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, BRISTOL86 said:

If we miss out on Hughton, a proven winner at this level, because we fannied about trying to poach a completely unproven Gerrard, it will be the most Bristol City thing ever. 

How true. I hope Hughton isn't peed off. I can imagine what he would be thinking about us, going for an unproven prospect based on Lansdown's gut instinct, rather than on consultation with those who have what he doesn't - football knowledge. Appointing managers is thr most important job he has. So far he has bollocksed it up with one exception.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never nice to be "turned down". However, in this instance I'm relieved. Not the right appointment for us. Good luck to Gerrard and we move on.

Let's hope we haven't let the right man slip through our fingers. As others have said, that would be "very City"!

To the Premiership and beyond!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It won’t be uncommon for a manager to accept a role after another manager has turned down the role ( or for a club to refuse permission for their manager to be approached). Hughton has been in football long enough to know that. If he turns us down out of principle and takes, for example, the Brum job, I would be hugely surprised!

That said, it Probably won’t be Hughton anyway. I’m expecting a left field appointment now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, southvillekiddy said:

How true. I hope Hughton isn't peed off. I can imagine what he would be thinking about us, going for an unproven prospect based on Lansdown's gut instinct, rather than on consultation with those who have what he doesn't - football knowledge. Appointing managers is thr most important job he has. So far he has bollocksed it up with one exception.

I think he’s been around the block enough to know that very often it’s not the first choice or unanimous choice that ultimately gets the job. 

If he wants the job and the money’s right I’m sure he’ll be more than happy to accept. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Shockwave said:

How often does Gregor get things right?

No one will confirm what he claims 

This was his tweet earlier today so based on his latest revelation, you can make your own mind up.....

CEO Mark Ashton writes in tonight’s match programme that the search for a new #BristolCity head coach continues via that ‘rigorous interview process’. Our understanding is there is still nothing close. Not expecting any further official news on the process today either.
1:24 pm · 22 Jul 2020·Twitter for iPhone
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always analyse the messaging and interests me that the club would be happy for rejection to be made public.

Is that because they want to show the fans that they tried?

Or was it being leaked from Gerrard's side as a symbol of his loyalty?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mozo said:

I always analyse the messaging and interests me that the club would be happy for rejection to be made public.

Is that because they want to show the fans that they tried?

Or was it being leaked from Gerrard's side as a symbol of his loyalty?

Either way it doesn't look like Gerrard will be our man

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Kid in the Riot said:

Strange "win". You identify your number 1 target and he rejects you? 

That's rejection and a defeat. But you roll with the punches and move onto your next target.

Steve Lansdowns Number 1 target....is a lot different to Bristol City supporters Number 1 target.  I am relieved he has turned us down. IMHO we need experience at this time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, BRISTOL86 said:

If we miss out on Hughton, a proven winner at this level, because we fannied about trying to poach a completely unproven Gerrard, it will be the most Bristol City thing ever. 

Lest we forget the Nketiah saga.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, eric04 said:

Gregor’s source is the Daily Record’s podcast. The guys name is Duncan Castles. 

Specifically this podcast. The matter is discussed from about 46:30.

https://www.spreaker.com/user/12250300/newcastle-takeover-every-question-answer

1 minute ago, Lrrr said:

Bristol Live understands is used twice in the full article

Yes, but not in Gregor's tweet. He usually uses it in the tweet itself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm glad if it's true.

Who wants to be known as Steven Gerrard's Bristol City for starters...

Joking aside... finding a coach/manager that will agree to fit in with our set up will be a hard task after LJ.

From an owner's point of view it was the perfect scenario.

I feel the goal posts may have to move towards what the manager wants a little, to get what's going to move us forward.

If Gerrard turned us down..was it because we are BCFC, or because of our conditions? Or did we turn him down as found not to our liking after interview...if he did.

Any coach coming in will have his way of working. Will that coincide with working with MA and our present coaching staff? Will we want to keep what we've got in place? Will a new manager want his own staff?

I think these questions are what will decide who comes in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think you can fault the board for identifying their number 1 choice and go for broke to get him.  It had to be someone, and if SG fitted the bill, so be it.

If anything I say fair play.  He was a big target and we will never know how close we actually came.  Draw a line under it and move on.

Like I have said in previous posts, this job actually should be on radars of managers 2 or 3 years ago were out of our reach.  As far as wages are concerned, if we can agree a punt on player will probably cost $1-2 million then spending this on a managers wages, should not be off putting.

With a transfer window looming, I would imagine that MA has already identified the players he wants and the players he will move on.  Another assumption is that the new man will probably have to fall in line with those decisions, the longer this goes on the more relevant this statement will become.

Its a process and very complex one at that.  Hold on to your hats I say, this is far from over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BRISTOL86 said:

If we miss out on Hughton, a proven winner at this level, because we fannied about trying to poach a completely unproven Gerrard, it will be the most Bristol City thing ever. 

My thoughts exactly.

It’s Gray, Gayle and Nketiah all over again. Faffing about chasing unrealistic targets who show no signs of wanting to come here rather than focusing on realistic and sensible options.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Lez said:

Why the **** would SG leave rangers for Bristol city. Bizarre the whole thing.

I wouldn't say it was bizarre, its more of statement of A) How far we have come as club. B) Nails on the superiority of the Championship over the SPL.   SG has demonstrated his loyalty throughout his career, I didn't think he would leave Rangers for us, he wants to see the job through.  Far enough.  I don't have a problem with the club trying to get the man that might be out of their reach, rather someone who would say yes straight away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Lez said:

Well it's a statement of how far we HAVENT come because he is not interested!

Big difference between considering an offer and being not interested.

Obvious but needed pointing out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin
3 minutes ago, billywedlock said:

Well . SG must have shown some interest in the role so the question would be why we could but conclude it . His demands or our demands ? 

Why? 

Apart from press talk and twitter he's always stated he wasn't interested. 

Sadly with social media people believe too many things as being fact

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Red_Alligator said:

Never nice to be "turned down". However, in this instance I'm relieved. Not the right appointment for us. Good luck to Gerrard and we move on.

To the Premiership and beyond!

.... I think you’re fixated on Gerrard, he’s a manager in the Premiership already - our top tier ain’t called that 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, billywedlock said:

though hearing publicly someone turned us down is poor from someone in that loop and would make it slightly uncomfortable if someone knows they are second or third choice . 

Think you can talk your way around this pretty easily.

If, and i've no idea if it's the case but let's say theoretically, terms had been agreed with Hughton, you simply say to him that he was one of the final few names in the frame, discussions with the others have concluded and he was the preferred candidate. Gerrard could have been the number one target but we could have failed, and it could have become public, to come to terms with Hughton. You're establishing if an agreement can be reached, not offering someone the job. That's the line, if needed, at least.. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can we reign in the SG circle jerk.

It will be an absolute miracle if SL can prise him away from the Rangers job. SG has literally got nothing to lose up there and far more at risk taking on an a bang average championship club. 

Gonna be embarrassing having a longer thread for the guy who didn’t even get the job.

Can see the parallels with the Rugby and admire it but who the Fudge let it be known publicly he’s our main target. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Red Alert said:

Can we reign in the SG circle jerk.

It will be an absolute miracle if SL can prise him away from the Rangers job. SG has literally got nothing to lose up there and far more at risk taking on an a bang average championship club. 

Gonna be embarrassing having a longer thread for the guy who didn’t even get the job.

Can see the parallels with the Rugby and admire it but who the Fudge let it be known publicly he’s our main target. 

I don’t think anyone did. It has all been paper talk and at no point has anyone from city commented on it.

dont get me wrong. It appears like he was our first choice but we never made it public.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, YGBjammy said:

Would have been fun, but a massive risk, expensive wages. Also fear we would become the team to beat and "Steven Gerrard's Bristol city" ?

Absolutely!

Can't think off anything worse than all the vain bollocks putting a name before the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...