Jump to content
IGNORED

Bristol R*vers dustbin thread


42nite

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, NcnsBcfc said:

Is that the same Simon Csoka KC who represented Barton in his two trials? The club certainly keep him busy.

No doubt he'll now be employed for a certain centre forward at the club who is in Court next week as well?

Figures...

Simon specialises in all aspects of criminal law, in particular homicide, serious fraud and organised crime

https://www.lincolnhousechambers.com/members/simon-csoka-q-c

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ExiledAjax said:

Our fanbase is so small that we could fill their "stadium" only 1.5x with our season ticket holders alone (about 14,500 STs in a ground of 9,800 capacity). Their season ticket holders... wouldn't even fill the South Stand (about 5,000 STs in a stand of 6,000).

Some of our potential season ticket holders had trouble with Ticketmaster and were in effect 'locked out' . Out true STH base would be closer to 15,000 :)

  • Haha 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, TomF said:

aaand if by magic

Screenshot 2023-06-30 134339.jpg

 

If they ram that through in less than two months they'll be wide open to a JR I'd imagine. 

So given the determination date is 3 weeks after the start of the season and they haven't even started building it yet, where are they going to put all the supporters that have bought ST's in this non-existent stand???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, BCFC11 said:

I can't wait to see this 'concourse' of theirs.

Probably a better view of the Concourse than the Goal, what with all those Stanchions in the way.
Still, I guess having a restricted view ticket out there is a bonus :gasmask:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Miah Dennehy said:

Some of our potential season ticket holders had trouble with Ticketmaster and were in effect 'locked out' . Out true STH base would be closer to 15,000 :)

Illiteracy can be a terrible curse with unforeseen impact.

Edited by ExiledAjax
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, RedRaw said:

Here you go…..

https://pa.bristol.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=documents&keyVal=RSQK1RDNKSY00

tha back of the fag packet application is in…..official objection from the local neighbourhood group already in

 

IMG_7354.jpeg

Looks like a subbuteo stand . Some of that lot getting excited by it though ????

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ska Junkie said:

'NOT MUCH IN FAN BASE SIZE'?

We average 20000+ while they average a lot less than half of that.

Magger, you're a deluded doughnut!

Not only is the fan base less than half the size but it’s also dying out.

Very very few youngsters support the few, the gap is growing, you ****, not closing.

The Championship is something they know absolutely nothing about, 30 years since they were at that level now.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, GreedyHarry said:

Well from what little I know of the law they’ve already breached one about undertaking construction works prior to 0730 and one about not ripping down trees between May and September.

As that’s documented I’d hope that the appropriate authorities deal with them.

 

Not only between those dates. Similar to an application next door to me. If you look at the application form where information is provided to the question "are any trees or hedges to be removed" the NO dot is filled in.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’ll be interesting to see how the planning application plays out. It’s pretty minor scheme in the grand scheme of things, but the quality of application itself is appalling. It barely gives any detail for residents to understand the impacts of the proposal.
 

I’d imagine the good people of Horfield (wasn’t there a campaign group before?, Residents Opposed to Stadium Expansion, ROSE??) will kick up enough of a stink to get it to a planning committee and delay it a bit.
 

That said, it seems like Rovers are ploughing on regardless, which is an interesting approach to maintaining good relations with their neighbours…

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here's a taster, gurt Teds in the objections I tell you...

Comment Details
Commenter Type: Neighbour
Stance: Customer objects to the Planning Application
Comment Reasons:
Comment:

Bristol Rovers have been constructing this stand without planning, or consideration for
neighbours for a number of weeks, they have been starting works as early at 6:30am and
concluding as late as 8pm.

They have ripped down trees and shrubs which are necessary to protect privacy to residents on the street, and to act as a barrier for noise and the rubbish which
comes from the ground, as well as being a loss for wildlife. The proposed stand is much larger,
and will impact on the light in the street, the noise on match day and the number of people which
park on the street which is already restricted. The new structure will clearly over shadow
neighbouring homes and gardens.

The increased capacity will significantly increase the number of cars on the narrow streets, and the number of people who park dangerously, the grounds do little
to assist with this in any way currently. It also means residents with young children, or mobility
issues, are often left unable to park near or on the surrounding streets to their homes. The ground
already makes a significant amount of noise for local residents, and in the past they have left on
their scoreboard emitting a high pitched noise often for days. If the capacity is increased the noise
will also increase, this is often late into the night, and is not appreciated by those of us with young children.

Trees on the boundary between residents gardens and the grounds have been ripped down with
no consideration for neighbours privacy or the impact on the local wildlife, especially as we are in
nesting season.

I am concerned the impact that increased capacity has on the fire evacuation procedure, the
grounds currently use the entrance on Alton road as an emergency exit, the close proximity of the
stand to this exit, and the large number of people who would be on the narrow street is a cause for
concern.

Given the scale of the new stand and the impact on the surrounding properties it is going to stick
out, as a metal box that does nothing to improve the visuals for the area

The grounds have not responded satisfactorily to any queries raised by locals as to the impact the
stand will have on them, they have not conducted any public consultation, giving adequate notice for attendance or with anyone who is involved in the project. They believe that they can build the stand no matter the impact, and that nothing will be done.

Although the planning application has only been made live, they have already been sharing plans on their website and selling tickets for
the stand, and started construction.

Their actions suggest they are above any laws, rules and
processes put in place that might hinder them having this stand operational for the new season.

  • Like 9
  • Haha 2
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From one of the objections:

Quote

In addition to the issue of planning permission, there is a lack of evidence to justify the proposed
increased stadium capacity. The current proposal fails to provide any data or analysis that
convincingly demonstrates the need for such expansion. It is imperative that any increase in
capacity aligns with the demands and needs of the local community, and is supported by sound
evidence

Asking the gas for facts/evidence is akin to asking them where the soap is kept.
It will be greeted by a vacant gormless stare 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...