Jump to content
IGNORED

Bristol R*vers dustbin thread


42nite

Recommended Posts

11 hours ago, weepywall said:

Looks like a good signing to be fair.

 

11 hours ago, bcfc01 said:

Not sure.

76 minutes in the EFL with Hull last season.

Time will tell, good player for England u20 tbf.

I raise you Taylor Moore. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Hot Air said:

Is the Championship much better? Luton and Sheffield United are bang average sides who got promoted last season.

L1 includes Bolton and Barnsley, two clubs who have played in the PL within living memory, unlike BCFC. 

And as for being over budget...planks and splinters come to mind. 

Deary me

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Hot Air said:

Is the Championship much better? Luton and Sheffield United are bang average sides who got promoted last season.

L1 includes Bolton and Barnsley, two clubs who have played in the PL within living memory, unlike BCFC. 

And as for being over budget...planks and splinters come to mind. 

I bet you were itching to put '82' on the end of that...:gasmask:

  • Like 1
  • Haha 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Hot Air said:

.....planks and splinters come to mind. 

Thanks for bringing the stadium back into the conversation.

If Rovers spend big and get promoted then fair enough, any promotion is tough, but the wage bills for the various divisions tell the story about what is needed in terms of quality, there is a big difference.

Having an 'eye for midfielders' is not enough in itself if the signings are all loans.

The joint owners have one thing right, these things do take time. Why they then try to take short cuts is a mystery.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Open End Numb Legs said:

Thanks for bringing the stadium back into the conversation.

If Rovers spend big and get promoted then fair enough, any promotion is tough, but the wage bills for the various divisions tell the story about what is needed in terms of quality, there is a big difference.

Having an 'eye for midfielders' is not enough in itself if the signings are all loans.

The joint owners have one thing right, these things do take time. Why they then try to take short cuts is a mystery.

I think the "these things take time" probably referred to their temporary new stand...!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Hot Air said:

Elliot Anderson was a huge success for BRFC, winning national plaudits, and Barton has a good eye for a midfielder. 

BRFC signed two promising players from Chelsea before - Colkett and Clarke-Salter. Great things were expected of the former, but he struggled to live up to the physical demands of the league and had his loan cancelled early before briefly resurfacing at Swindon. 

The latter didn't live up to the billing, but subsequently became a championship-level player (QPR, mind)

With the exception of a very few, it is extremely hard to tell at this stage if players will make it. 

 

The new owner seems to be an unknown quantity. It will be interesting to see if he is willing to put in funds to follow the Fruitihad dream and upgrade the team. And will Wael be sidelined now he’s just a minority shareholder?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Leveller said:

The new owner seems to be an unknown quantity. It will be interesting to see if he is willing to put in funds to follow the Fruitihad dream and upgrade the team. And will Wael be sidelined now he’s just a minority shareholder?

What do we think the chances are that he is both an unknown quantity and has sufficient funds necessary to spend on a football club over a significant period of restructuring? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, BS3 Ark at Ee said:

One of their posters claims we’ve stagnated in the championship and only get crowds of 12-15,000 these days ??‍♂️ That’s odd considering we’ve got just shy of 15,000 season ticket holders! ??‍♂️

This is the old argument about tickets sold v. actual bums on seats.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Open End Numb Legs said:

Could you paste some onto here please?

I don't do Twitter so can't see them.

 

E3EEF775-8344-44FC-9730-59866D34FDEC.jpeg

8 minutes ago, BS3 Ark at Ee said:

One of their posters claims we’ve stagnated in the championship and only get crowds of 12-15,000 these days ??‍♂️ That’s odd considering we’ve got just shy of 15,000 season ticket holders! ??‍♂️

Eh? 

  • Haha 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Open End Numb Legs said:

Thanks for the Twitter pastes.

You can understand the frustration from the average fans who pay good money when times are hard and expect better. Success on the pitch is never easy, treating your fanbase with respect can be planned for.

They've got the club their supporters deserve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Leveller said:

This is the old argument about tickets sold v. actual bums on seats.

Our attendances and theirs are calculated on tickets sold. As we’ve seen often especially at certain times of the year (ie Summer Holidays, Christmas) not everyone who has a ST will be there.

To suggest that we only get, on average, 12-15k though is rubbish. 

They love to point out that we are merely ‘treading water’ in the Championship but would they get the sort of crowds we get if they were in the bottom 10 in this division for the best part of 3 years? No chance.

 

 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Admin

I had to laugh at this line from the following report 

Huge support for Bristol Rovers plan as new stand becomes a political football - Bristol Live (bristolpost.co.uk)

And a post from Bristol Labour claimed: “3,500 Gasheads missed today's game without the new stand at the Mem, and so local businesses lost out too #GreenPartyDelays must end – they should stop holding up Bristol Rovers’ planning application, like they did did with the UWE Stadium.”

  • Haha 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are the 2015 Fewers revolting ? (yes, I know they are, but you know what I mean);

"If I recall correctly, when the South Stand proposals were originally announced TG stated that they were aware that the lead times were tight and there was risk it would not be ready "for the start of the season". However, he also stated there were contingency plans should it not prove achievable. Well apart from asking the league to give us away fixtures to start the season (and presumably later asking Barnsley to switch) what happened to those contingency plans?"

"He also stood at the fixture release breakfast and told fans to their face that everything was on course and not to listen to the “media”.

 

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...