Jump to content
IGNORED

Bristol R*vers dustbin thread


42nite

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Cheesleysmate said:

Why are they so obsessed with attendances and their away following? They are almost as obsessed about it as they are about us.....Oh yeah, now I remember it is because they recently found out that Wally isn't as rich as Steve and they have been left to look like the gift that just can't help giving AGAIN ......

:facepalm::facepalm::facepalm::laughcont:

IMG_0160.JPG

What's the 1883? Their highest-ever attendance?

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, Bazooka Joe said:

What's the 1883? Their highest-ever attendance?

Hmm well Bristol Rovers as a club name wasnt formed until 1899 whilst the name Bristol City was 1897 so im not really sure....There was a team called Black Arabs around the area at that time mind you....

Edited by Kodjias Wrist
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Kodjias Wrist said:

Hmm well Bristol Rovers as a club name wasnt formed until 1899 whilst the name Bristol City was 1897 so im not really sure....There was a team called Black Arabs around the area at that time mind you....

Stick your facts up your ass, please..! 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Kodjias Wrist said:

Hmm well Bristol Rovers as a club name wasnt formed until 1899 whilst the name Bristol City was 1897 so im not really sure....There was a team called Black Arabs around the area at that time mind you....

Yes, the 1883 date relates to the predecessor of the predecessor of one of the teams that merged to become horse Punching Sag Losers FC.

But since when have they been concerned with facts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, 'keepuplino' said:

Yet the numptys still think they will draw in  15,000... delusional fools :)

IMG_7126.PNG

Glory hunters? :blink:

And what atmosphere?  by all accounts its usually dead until the Sags fluke a last minute penalty.. plenty of fans have said this from what i've seen on other forums

Edited by Dark Wood Covert
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SalisburyRed said:

Yes, the 1883 date relates to the predecessor of the predecessor of one of the teams that merged to become horse Punching Sag Losers FC.

But since when have they been concerned with facts?

They are only concerned with away attendances.Theirs is apparently the biggest and best ever (faithful and true) according to um.....them! 72 at Scunthorpe on a Tuesday versus 29,000 Sags turning up against Chelsea. Best away supporters in history 

Edited by Cheesleysmate
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Dark Wood Covert said:

 

Rover's Attendance facts - the missing blue few!

If you compare the av attendance of both clubs using calculations based on historical attendance data from shortening start points the trend is quite interesting.

 

AV calculated from

1921

1947

1967

1992

1997

2007

 

Av

Av

Av

Av

Av

Av

rovers

9699.42

9880.95

7038.06

6454.32

6698.65

6628.3

city

13882.07

14212.38

12743.58

12108.56

12817.85

14158.6

Gas att as % of City's

69.87

69.52

55.22

53.30

52.26

46.81

Att differential

4182.65

4331.42

5705.52

5654.24

6119.2

7530.3

 

                      141586 14158.6
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, adamski said:

in the 90 years of data, the gas have had a higher attendance than us on 14 occasions, the last in 1982/3

That's shocking, they've had a higher attendance than us on 14 occasions?? Some of the senior generation should have serious look at themselves and explain this outrage????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, adamski said:

in the 90 years of data, the gas have had a higher attendance than us on 14 occasions, the last in 1982/3

Are you sure about that.  I remember looking at the data and seeing only two seasons when they had higher gates than us, once in the fifties and 82/83 as you said.  There might be a confusion with the number of times they have finished above us in the league, which is about 12 times.

Edited by Malago
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, adamski said:

Rover's Attendance facts - the missing blue few!

If you compare the av attendance of both clubs using calculations based on historical attendance data from shortening start points the trend is quite interesting.

 

 

AV calculated from

 

1921

 

1947

 

1967

 

1992

 

1997

 

2007

 

 

 

Av

 

Av

 

Av

 

Av

 

Av

 

Av

 

rovers

 

9699.42

 

9880.95

 

7038.06

 

6454.32

 

6698.65

 

6628.3

 

city

 

13882.07

 

14212.38

 

12743.58

 

12108.56

 

12817.85

 

14158.6

 

Gas att as % of City's

 

69.87

 

69.52

 

55.22

 

53.30

 

52.26

 

46.81

 

Att differential

 

4182.65

 

4331.42

 

5705.52

 

5654.24

 

6119.2

 

7530.3

 

 

 

                      141586 14158.6

And 2017 is likely to be Rovers at around 8/9,000 and City at 18/19/20,000. 

On a slightly seperate note, it's really quite strange how usually, a promotion season for one team is mirrored by the other. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If there are any of the blue few on here who will be celebrating their 16th birthday tomorrow, let me be the first to wish you a happy birthday, and to remind you that anyone of your age or younger has never,  EVER, seen your rag-bag Rovers team above City in your entire lives ! :chant6ez: COYR 

http://www.timeanddate.com/countdown/soccer?iso=20001028T1645&p0=299&msg=CITY+above+rovers

Edited by myol'man
  • Like 13
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...