Jump to content
IGNORED

Massengo and Bakinson = weak midfield


Topper 123

Recommended Posts

Massengo and Bakinson are too weak for championship football neither have contributed with a assist or a goal which is shocking given the time on pitch and I personally watched Bakinson for the last 20 minutes at Coventry and not once did he pick anyone up , the team can not afford passengers in the championship who are frightened to challenge or put a foot in , Massengo can pull the ball down lovely but cannot do anything with it 

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 8
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Lucan said:

*ALMOST* home grown.  Read what I said please.

I am aware he played once for Luton

He was 2 months from his 19th birthday. I wouldn’t even call that ‘almost’ home grown. 
Sorry. I don’t mean to pick on you or be pedantic but there are many who actually do think he’s ‘home grown’, when he’s not. Not even almost. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Magger1 said:

I will challenge anyone to come on here and tell me what Massengo brings to the team , nor Bakinson who in my opinion would do well to hold down a place in a div 1 side both are not physical both are shot shy neither reads the game well or can pick up a runner ! 

Watch the QPR away game and you will see what he offers.

He's young and he's not the finished article so will have bad games and make some mistakes. However, when he is playing well, he's one of the best players we have in my opinion. I think that QPR match is the best example.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Massengo needs to be played further forward, he's physical enough, but a bit too sloppy to be in contested midfield battles. However, his dribbling skill and ability to create space is maybe the best in the league.

Bakinson undoubtedly has talent and can pick classy passes, but his performances need to improve to keep in the X11. Calls for him to be sold are too far though, he will come good I expect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What both players need around them is leadership / experience.  Williams provided that today, James and King did earlier this season.

Williams (24) the veteran in there today with Benarous (18) (then Massengo (20)) and Bakinson (23) alongside him…and Scott (18) playing RWB.  He led them superbly.

Thought there was really good “talking” out there too in the press. Weimann ensuring Tyreeq not dragged out of position.

  • Like 10
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok so people say he had a good game at QPR Ffs that was 2 seasons ago and still hasn’t commanded a first team spot even though our midfield been dog poo ,he hasn’t so much as set up a goal let alone score ,so you deluded nutters who think that’s enough I got news for you , that will relegate us 

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Magger1 said:

Ok so people say he had a good game at QPR Ffs that was 2 seasons ago and still hasn’t commanded a first team spot even though our midfield been dog poo ,he hasn’t so much as set up a goal let alone score ,so you deluded nutters who think that’s enough I got news for you , that will relegate us 

Think they are referring to the away fixture this season when he played as a no10.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bakunin is not good enough at this level.

Bored of saying it. Does not effect the game either going forward or defending. Weak in the tackle does not track back and rarely threatens going forward.

Some people are saying he had a ‘good’ game today - nonsense. Name one good thing he done. Get rid as soon as January comes.

As for Massengo it’s a bit harder. Younger player and is improving. My question is do he impact the game - at the moment for me no. So although I do want him to get there I am not sure again he is worth his place unless he starts to impact the game.

Williams and James are the bench mark and both are well short for me.

Both show we need to sign another midfielder in Jan even if on loan.

Williams looks a great player every time he plays and with James I think we have a good pairing. 
 

Bakinson - Out

Massengo - Keep 

  • Haha 1
  • Hmmm 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess it’ll always be the way on here but time and time again we go from, this time HNM, as “MOM” “brilliant again” “he’ll be premier league bound in January” for many games.

To coming back from an injury not at his best, maybe subconsciously thinking about not getting the same injury a 3rd time and now he’s never gonna make a championship midfielder and we should get rid.

Im predicting it’ll be Vyner next. Came back after a long time out of the team, got absolutely slaughtered on here. Played ok today, will have a cracking game against Stoke and by Thursday he’ll be off to Chelsea in the summer…..according to OTIB

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, REDOXO said:

Bakinson played well today. A couple of wrong decisions but all in all not bad! 
 

Im in a minority here. But I’m not a fan is Massengo. I just feel when ever he is added in it’s a matter of time before we conceded. I would suspect statistics might support that view. 
 

 

Before today, here’s a pic of goals scored / conceded whilst on the pitch.

image.thumb.png.368f3b120ccbb63ef1826819777f73ba.png

It’s sorted on Goals Against per 90…the second red column.  O’Dowda out on his own!!

The players who’ve played more games lately definitely coming out on top (top is bad).

As you’ll see from the +/- column, only Semenyo and Scott are in credit!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, ralphindevon said:

I guess it’ll always be the way on here but time and time again we go from, this time HNM, as “MOM” “brilliant again” “he’ll be premier league bound in January” for many games.

To coming back from an injury not at his best, maybe subconsciously thinking about not getting the same injury a 3rd time and now he’s never gonna make a championship midfielder and we should get rid.

Im predicting it’ll be Vyner next. Came back after a long time out of the team, got absolutely slaughtered on here. Played ok today, will have a cracking game against Stoke and by Thursday he’ll be off to Chelsea in the summer…..according to OTIB

Subconsciously not thinking about a third injury. If I had a player and he never gave 100% because worried about a third injury I’d have the ****** out the side 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

Before today, here’s a pic of goals scored / conceded whilst on the pitch.

image.thumb.png.368f3b120ccbb63ef1826819777f73ba.png

It’s sorted on Goals Against per 90…the second red column.  O’Dowda out on his own!!

The players who’ve played more games lately definitely coming out on top (top is bad).

As you’ll see from the +/- column, only Semenyo and Scott are in credit!

Bless you. I knew you wouldn’t resist answering with a spreadsheet. Thanks!

So fourth worst while on the pitch in total. What’s his rate goals four and against when subbed on compared to all minutes, which was the comment.
 

To me anecdotally we just start looking jittery and look more likely to concede and to me at least pretty much always do. Winning positions lost after second half substitutions might be an interesting stat. 

Edited by REDOXO
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Fordy62 said:

I don’t think Bakinson has any urgency and he annoys me. Looks to play good through balls, but rarely executes them. 

Massengo however is a very good player. I bet you anything you like he moves onto a better team than us. 

To be fair it looks like most players end up doing well once they leave the club. Most recently at least. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, REDOXO said:

Bakinson played well today. A couple of wrong decisions but all in all not bad! 
 

Im in a minority here. But I’m not a fan is Massengo. I just feel when ever he is added in it’s a matter of time before we conceded. I would suspect statistics might support that view. 
 

 

Thought Bakinson put in a shift best I have seen him in that respect, re: Massengo disagree qualit player but does need to score goals he is only 20 don forget

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, REDOXO said:

Bless you. I knew you wouldn’t resist answering with a spreadsheet. Thanks!

So fourth worst while on the pitch in total. What’s his rate goals four and against when subbed on compared to all minutes, which was the comment.
 

To me anecdotally we just start looking jittery and look more likely to concede and to me at least pretty much always do. Winning positions lost after second half substitutions might be an interesting stat. 

Okay, so that was a goals view from the FBRef website where I scrape the data into Tableau….so I can’t drill down to starts v subs.

But, I do create my own data of what I call “points won / lost” whilst on the pitch….where I track how the “result” changes between W, D & L.  All starters start with a draw, as the game starts 0-0.  If we are leading when a player leaves the pitch, then they get +2, if we are losing they get -1, etc.  Today Massengo would get -2, as we went from a winning (W) position to a drawing (D) position, e,g. From 3 pts to 1 pt.

Its not an exact science, but it’s something I’m keen to develop to see whether it does have some correlation or not.

Heres Massengo (before today), using my data:

D4EA0E33-2D17-40D2-9FE8-AEC1BEA88287.thumb.jpeg.bc1eefcc916ca22ef30f320cc687c224.jpeg
Your gut feel is looking good.  One might also argue he’s more effective in a more advanced or wide midfield role…which funnily enough is where he played in France, either on the side (predominately) or tip (less so) of a diamond.  He is not a DM (imho).

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

Okay, so that was a goals view from the FBRef website where I scrape the data into Tableau….so I can’t drill down to starts v subs.

But, I do create my own data of what I call “points won / lost” whilst on the pitch….where I track how the “result” changes between W, D & L.  All starters start with a draw, as the game starts 0-0.  If we are leading when a player leaves the pitch, then they get +2, if we are losing they get -1, etc.  Today Massengo would get -2, as we went from a winning (W) position to a drawing (D) position, e,g. From 3 pts to 1 pt.

Its not an exact science, but it’s something I’m keen to develop to see whether it does have some correlation or not.

Heres Massengo (before today), using my data:

D4EA0E33-2D17-40D2-9FE8-AEC1BEA88287.thumb.jpeg.bc1eefcc916ca22ef30f320cc687c224.jpeg
Your gut feel is looking good.  One might also argue he’s more effective in a more advanced or wide midfield role…which funnily enough is where he played in France, either on the side (predominately) or tip (less so) of a diamond.  He is not a DM (imho).

 

Thanks Dave. So there is statistical support for my ‘gut’ Good to know. 
 

Yes I’m sure there are arguments to be made on position etc and how he is played off the bench, however that’s how I keep seeing it. We are a team waiting to concede if he comes off the bench. 
 

Thanks for all the effort you put in!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...