Jump to content
IGNORED

Wales v Ukraine


Malago

Recommended Posts

9 minutes ago, And Its Smith said:

I usually want all the home nations to win but it’s hard not to want Ukraine given the country’s circumstances 

Yeah, normally I would be 100% for Wales (Welsh Grandad) but given the circumstances...I'm torn.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Red Army 75 said:

Commentator said at the beginning of the game that there is VAR but no goal line technology. Because they didn’t want to spend the money on it. Seems really strange to me with what is at stake. 

Does seem bizarre - especially when you consider a goal line technology system is used during the Championship season for Cardiff games. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, SecretSam said:

Ah balls, Yarmolenko needs to leave that.

 

How come they aren't playing such a big game at the Millennium?

It’s owned by the WRU (England football, has never been played at Twickenham) and the lease was 21 years that is now run out. But I think it was Speed that wanted this Together Stronger spirit, to create atmosphere  which they didn’t get at The Millennium stadium. 
There was also an argument that money went towards WRU and not towards FAW. 

Edited by RedorDead BCFC
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RedorDead BCFC said:

It’s owned by the WRU and the lease was 21 years that is now run out. But I think it was Speed that wanted this Together Stronger spirit, to create atmosphere  which they didn’t get at The Millennium stadium. 
There was also an argument that money went towards WRU and not towards FAW. 

Thanks. Knew it would involve money...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SecretSam said:

Thanks. Knew it would involve money...

No worries, I have edited my reply with I don’t think England football has ever been played at Twickenham. May be wrong but I can’t ever recall football played there. 
 

However for some strange reason, the FA cup, play offs etc was chosen to be played at Millennium not Twickenham. So may be something to with RFU not wanting any football played. Also could be in return for Wales rugby using Wembley when Millennium was being built. 

Edited by RedorDead BCFC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RoystonFoote'snephew said:

Hennessey being Wales best player 1st half says it all. Allen and Ramsey have been very poor. 

They’re used to having Morrell or Ampadu just sitting in, in a 4231.  But as a two they are getting dragged about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RedorDead BCFC said:

No worries, I have edited my reply with I don’t think England football has ever been played at Twickenham.
 

However for some strange reason, the FA cup, play offs etc was chosen to be played at Millennium not Twickenham.

Yeah, but there are plenty of big English grounds. Always thought the choice of the Millennium was odd. Nice ground, tho'

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, East Londoner said:

How is it fair to have a one off final at one teams stadium. I know they’ve tried milking these playoffs by having more teams than normal involved but surely a one off match where the winner goes to the World Cup should be played in a neutral stadium 

Odd. Two legs would make sense, although tricky for Ukraine just now ???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, East Londoner said:

How is it fair to have a one off final at one teams stadium. I know they’ve tried milking these playoffs by having more teams than normal involved but surely a one off match where the winner goes to the World Cup should be played in a neutral stadium 

Because Wales have earned the right due to a better qualification campaign.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, And Its Smith said:

Because Wales have earned the right due to a better qualification campaign.  

That doesn’t make it fair though especially when every other year it’s over two legs. Obviously Ukraine would’ve had to hold theirs at a neutral stadium 

Edited by East Londoner
Autocorrect
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Rob k said:

Soft but a pen for me 

It always seems harsh to me when Player A is going to play the ball, then gets penalised when Player B (maybe deliberately) puts his foot between A’s foot and the ball at the last second. Who is creating the contact? I think B  is and it shouldn’t be a foul.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, East Londoner said:

That doesn’t make it fair though especially when every other year it’s over two legs. Obviously Ukraine would’ve had to hold theirs at a neutral stadium 

Ukraine have played an extra game as well, having to beat Scotland. Is that not fair?  They have changed the way qualifying works so anything that has happened before isn’t relevant.  Everyone knew the rules before so it seems very fair. Have a better qualification campaign and get rewarded for it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, SecretSam said:

That's just daft.

Is it? Some people want to the EFL play offs to be 6th v 5th, that winner v 4th and that winner v 3rd.  This is similar.  Can’t see that rewarding the teams with a better campaign in a play off scenario is daft 

1 minute ago, SecretSam said:

PS not Scotland 

I want Scotland to win when they play in qualifiers. The more home nations at a major tournament the better. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, And Its Smith said:

Ukraine have played an extra game as well, having to beat Scotland. Is that not fair?  They have changed the way qualifying works so anything that has happened before isn’t relevant.  Everyone knew the rules before so it seems very fair. Have a better qualification campaign and get rewarded for it 

Not an extra game, Wales beat Austria in March. The Ukraine/Scotland game was due to be played then too but postponed due to the war. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, And Its Smith said:

Ukraine have played an extra game as well, having to beat Scotland. Is that not fair?  They have changed the way qualifying works so anything that has happened before isn’t relevant.  Everyone knew the rules before so it seems very fair. Have a better qualification campaign and get rewarded for it 

Wales beat Austria to get to this game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Leveller said:

It always seems harsh to me when Player A is going to play the ball, then gets penalised when Player B (maybe deliberately) puts his foot between A’s foot and the ball at the last second. Who is creating the contact? I think B  is and it shouldn’t be a foul.

Have to say I agree with this. However, this season there were quite a few penalties given for similar tackles in the EPL. Though that probably shows a difference in interpretation between refs in England and the rest of Europe where they probably take intent into account.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SecretSam said:

Why would it be hatred?

I have Welsh and Irish blood (German, too ?). No Scottish.  

Lots of Welsh blood in Bristol due to the war. My cousins in their 30’s didn’t know our Nan was Welsh as she died when they were young. The look on their faces was priceless when I told them. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, East Londoner said:

How is it fair to have a one off final at one teams stadium. I know they’ve tried milking these playoffs by having more teams than normal involved but surely a one off match where the winner goes to the World Cup should be played in a neutral stadium 

Because Wales have earned the right due to a better qualification campaign.  

8 minutes ago, !james said:

Not an extra game, Wales beat Austria in March. The Ukraine/Scotland game was due to be played then too but postponed due to the war. 

And thanks.  Point still stands though about rewarding better campaigns with home advantage 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, And Its Smith said:

Because Wales have earned the right due to a better qualification campaign.  

And thanks.  Point still stands though about rewarding better campaigns with home advantage 

How can anyone judge that fairly when they didn't play the same teams

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SecretSam said:

Why would it be hatred?

I have Welsh and Irish blood (German, too ?). No Scottish.  

So why would you NEVER want Scotland to win? Against anyone? Logically suggests you dislike them more than Russia, Argentina, North Korea… ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, bredwood said:

Have to say I agree with this. However, this season there were quite a few penalties given for similar tackles in the EPL. Though that probably shows a difference in interpretation between refs in England and the rest of Europe where they probably take intent into account.

Can understand that view if there were no advantage gained by the defending team.

In this instance, I would say the Ukraine player was in a position to make positive play, he was upright, had his balance and able to take control of the ball. It was a direct advantage to Wales that he was fouled, all be it unintentionally. Anywhere else on the pitch, that would have been given as a foul.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Leveller said:

So why would you NEVER want Scotland to win? Against anyone? Logically suggests you dislike them more than Russia, Argentina, North Korea… ?

Russia isn't likely, nor N Korea. And what's the deal with Argentina? Think it's your prejudice that's showing, not mine.

Edited by SecretSam
Grammar
  • Like 1
  • Hmmm 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RedRock said:

Can understand that view if there were no advantage gained by the defending team.

In this instance, I would say the Ukraine player was in a position to make positive play, he was upright, had his balance and able to take control of the ball. It was a direct advantage to Wales that he was fouled, all be it unintentionally. Anywhere else on the pitch, that would have been given as a foul.

Suppose, being unable to control the ball, he sticks his foot where he knows he’ll be kicked, “buying” a foul? This happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SecretSam said:

Russia isn't likely, nor N Korea. And what's the deal with Argentina? Think it's your prejudice that's showing, not mine.

Well yes .. I’m prejudiced in favour of the UK teams against the rest. That’s my point.

Why aren’t Scotland likely to play Russia anyway? And why wouldn’t you support them if they did?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SecretSam said:

Russia isn't likely, nor N Korea. And what's the deal with Argentina? Think it's your prejudice showing.

Nothing wrong with being prejudice against two communist countries and Argentina after the ‘hand of god’ cheating episode.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Leveller said:

Well yes .. I’m prejudiced in favour of the UK teams against the rest. That’s my point.

Why aren’t Scotland likely to play Russia anyway? And why wouldn’t you support them if they did?

No-one's playing Russia just now...you know, the war? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...