Jump to content
Political Forum ×

Recommended Posts

Posted

Sleeping giant. Unlock potential. Tough times. Spend within our means. Sustainability. Yes of course I'll come on the show again sometime [then doesn't].

  • Like 4
  • Funny 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, mozo said:

Sleeping giant. Unlock potential. Tough times. Spend within our means. Sustainability. Yes of course I'll come on the show again sometime [then doesn't].

Or, building on good work behind the scenes already done, increasing revenue generation, improving club shop sales, scope for improvement.

Perhaps we should listen before being so cynically dismissive of someone we don't know anything about?

  • Like 9
Posted
20 minutes ago, Port Said Red said:

Or, building on good work behind the scenes already done, increasing revenue generation, improving club shop sales, scope for improvement.

Perhaps we should listen before being so cynically dismissive of someone we don't know anything about?

You both forgot “thank you to the Lansdown family”. 
Seriously, I’m hoping we’ll see more professionalism and a vision of what it really takes to get to the prem or sell the club (from someone who has sone both elsewhere). 

  • Like 1
Posted
30 minutes ago, Mendip City said:

You both forgot “thank you to the Lansdown family”. 
Seriously, I’m hoping we’ll see more professionalism and a vision of what it really takes to get to the prem or sell the club (from someone who has sone both elsewhere). 

And you haven't seen any of this under Richard Gould?

  • Like 4
  • Great Post 2
Posted
10 minutes ago, Port Said Red said:

And you haven't seen any of this under Richard Gould?

Yes, I said “more professionalism” meaning more of the same - but see that can be read a different way! 
What he adds is having actually run a club promoted. Also sold a club to new owners. 

  • Thank You 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

I think it’s very timely (bordering on a bit late), but good that he’s speaking whilst in handover territory.

I don't think I agree on the timing, thinking of it from a business perspective employees are usually told about a new guy coming in, but it's usually only the top levels they interact with on a daily basis during a handover period. 

The first time the rest of the staff may hear from them might be at conferences, video chats, over interactions after they have taken the role on permanently. 

For him to come forward too soon could have undermined RG in the last week's of his role.

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Port Said Red said:

I don't think I agree on the timing, thinking of it from a business perspective employees are usually told about a new guy coming in, but it's usually only the top levels they interact with on a daily basis during a handover period. 

The first time the rest of the staff may hear from them might be at conferences, video chats, over interactions after they have taken the role on permanently. 

For him to come forward too soon could have undermined RG in the last week's of his role.

Interesting take PSR.

Will be interesting to hear what he has to say.

Posted
1 hour ago, Port Said Red said:

Or, building on good work behind the scenes already done, increasing revenue generation, improving club shop sales, scope for improvement.

Perhaps we should listen before being so cynically dismissive of someone we don't know anything about?

Quite right. 
 

RG has done an excellent repair job after inheriting the mess created by Smarmy Ashton and the new guy will take over a well run organisation.

He’ll have a wealth of knowledge of the football industry built up in the years he was Palace and bring his negotiation skills - he probably knows numerous agents by their first names.

Rumour is that Alexander’s  name  was put forward by Richard Scudamore and if that’s true then that’s quite a recommendation.

  • Like 5
Posted
3 hours ago, mozo said:

Sleeping giant. Unlock potential. Tough times. Spend within our means. Sustainability. Yes of course I'll come on the show again sometime [then doesn't].

Really harsh.

Just because Ashton was a *** doesn’t mean everyone else is.

Gould didn’t have his finest hour in the interview when Pearson was absent with COVID, but I have genuinely believed everything that he’s said & think he’s been a force for good.

I’m going to judge this new bloke on his actions, not his predecessors.

  • Like 7
Posted
3 hours ago, Port Said Red said:

Or, building on good work behind the scenes already done, increasing revenue generation, improving club shop sales, scope for improvement.

Perhaps we should listen before being so cynically dismissive of someone we don't know anything about?

Improving club shop sales should be easy. Just bloody keep items in stock

  • Like 3
  • Funny 1
Posted
15 minutes ago, GrahamC said:

Really harsh.

Just because Ashton was a *** doesn’t mean everyone else is.

Gould didn’t have his finest hour in the interview when Pearson was absent with COVID, but I have genuinely believed everything that he’s said & think he’s been a force for good.

I’m going to judge this new bloke on his actions, not his predecessors.

It's only harsh if I'm wrong! At least wait for the interview then tell me I'm wrong.

Posted
16 minutes ago, mozo said:

It's only harsh if I'm wrong! At least wait for the interview then tell me I'm wrong.

Pretty much anyone can predict anything that any player or CEO etc will say. They get PR training from in house PR staff who are employed for that reason. You’re not mystic Meg 

Posted

For what it’s worth, on paper looks an excellent choice.  Yet, as others have said, depends on what he does, and that in turn on his relationship with owner and Chair, and, finally, and most importantly, what the chemistry between him and  NP/ Tinnion will be

 

 

Posted
31 minutes ago, Eddie Notgetinya said:

Pretty much anyone can predict anything that any player or CEO etc will say. They get PR training from in house PR staff who are employed for that reason. You’re not mystic Meg 

Which was exactly my point

Posted
1 minute ago, Clevedon Red said:

Received bids for 4/5 players, should be ok for FFP next year and we need to sell before we buy. 

Is that 4/5ths of one bid or 4 -5 bids for one players or multiple players? :)

Posted
6 minutes ago, Port Said Red said:

I reckon it's more likely to be a couple of different bids for Scott and Semenyo and maybe one for Bentley.

He definitely said ' for 4 or 5 players'  - GT asked if those included Scott and Semenyo and RG waffled around a bit and basically said yes without actually saying the word yes!

He also said players will go if the valuations are met.

Obvious I know -  but Nige hasn't gone that far yet.

  • Like 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, Port Said Red said:

Watching today makes me wonder whether anyone is interested in Vyner, he is looking very good right now.

Candidate for City player of the season. I can't believe I just said that, but it's true.

  • Like 15
Posted
43 minutes ago, mozo said:

Candidate for City player of the season. I can't believe I just said that, but it's true.

I was next to him in cafe Nero in town at the start of the season and said, somewhat creatively.....“have a good season, Zak”.

I think I’m probably partly responsible for his upturn in form. 

  • Like 4
  • Robin 3
  • Funny 8
  • Thank You 3
Posted
14 minutes ago, deadredfred said:

I was next to him in cafe Nero in town at the start of the season and said, somewhat creatively.....“have a good season, Zak”.

I think I’m probably partly responsible for his upturn in form. 

One day, when he's club captain and leads us to promotion, and he's asked how he kickstarted his City career, he'll reply, "Well, one moment that sticks in my mind was in Cafe Nero in 2022. I met someone who said something that was to change my life forever..."

  • Funny 13
  • Thank You 1
  • Great Post 1
Posted
40 minutes ago, deadredfred said:

I was next to him in cafe Nero in town at the start of the season and said, somewhat creatively.....“have a good season, Zak”.

I think I’m probably partly responsible for his upturn in form. 

Nah.

Based on what you think old him he blames you for him  putting pepper and salt on his cappuccino! 

  • Funny 1
Posted (edited)
5 minutes ago, italian dave said:

@REDOXO Why not? 

A club he’s been talking to about joining when his contract runs out makes a small offer for us to release him now? 

Massengo won’t make a difference to any club at either end of any table. So January really isn’t likely 

However 
 

If an offer comes in it would be due to more than one club being interested, and if one had a player barely getting in the U21s City would have snapped an arm off to unload him unless Massengo said no. 
 

So I think it’s very unlikely one has for him. 

Edited by REDOXO
Posted
1 minute ago, REDOXO said:

Massengo won’t make a difference to any club at either end of any table. Do January really isn’t likely 

However 
 

If an offer comes in it would be due to more than one club being interested and if one had a player barely getting in the U21s City would have snapped an arm off unless Massengo said no. 
 

So I think it’s very unlikely one has for him. 

I’m not talking about someone making a sudden swoop in the belief he’ll make a difference as a January signing.

Of course he’d have said no to any random bid: he controls his own destiny in a matter of months and he’ll only go where it suits him - and rightly so. 

But, as I understand it, he’s able to now to talk with clubs about his long term future, and reach initial agreement with them that he’ll sign a contract with them in the summer when his City contract is up.

If he’s in that position then it’s not inconceivable that they offer a small sum to get him there now: that would suit everyone concerned I’d have thought. 

Posted
Just now, italian dave said:

I’m not talking about someone making a sudden swoop in the belief he’ll make a difference as a January signing.

Of course he’d have said no to any random bid: he controls his own destiny in a matter of months and he’ll only go where it suits him - and rightly so. 

But, as I understand it, he’s able to now to talk with clubs about his long term future, and reach initial agreement with them that he’ll sign a contract with them in the summer when his City contract is up.

If he’s in that position then it’s not inconceivable that they offer a small sum to get him there now: that would suit everyone concerned I’d have thought. 

Obviously no one Massengo wants to go to has made an offer. IMO not one of the ones referred to by Gould. 
 

if an offer comes in from now on in and Massengo fancies it I’ll drive him/fly him myself

Posted
1 minute ago, REDOXO said:

Obviously no one Massengo wants to go to has made an offer. IMO not one of the ones referred to by Gould. 
 

if an offer comes in from now on in and Massengo fancies it I’ll drive him/fly him myself

Why “obviously”? This all started with us coming up with ideas who the 4 or 5 might be. There’s a couple of obvious candidates, but there’s a big ? over who the other 2-3 might be and this seems as likely as any other 

Fair enough if you think not, but unless you’re party to some inside information on transfers then neither of us knows. And I’m just suggesting it’s a possibility. 

Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, italian dave said:

Why “obviously”? This all started with us coming up with ideas who the 4 or 5 might be. There’s a couple of obvious candidates, but there’s a big ? over who the other 2-3 might be and this seems as likely as any other 

Fair enough if you think not, but unless you’re party to some inside information on transfers then neither of us knows. And I’m just suggesting it’s a possibility. 

And I’m suggesting it’s not. Any offer and he would be gone if the club had its way. Unless we are holding out for the full fiver it’s unlikely he’s one of those. 
 

Far more likely there have been offers for a player that is currently doing something. If you are looking for players outside of the obvious three I would look at Vyner and Towler who has gone(who knows if he is included in Goulds 4/5) and another one of our youngsters 
 

Then you have a plethora of other players that have value despite being close to contract being up. Bentley and Martin have value despite having six months left. 
 

Massengo right now hasn’t much value.  He’s an under 21 player that no one else wants consistently. The best we can hope IMO is a sell on clause and he turns into the world beater he so obviously isn’t now!
 

 

Edited by REDOXO
Posted
2 hours ago, mozo said:

One day, when he's club captain and leads us to promotion, and he's asked how he kickstarted his City career, he'll reply, "Well, one moment that sticks in my mind was in Cafe Nero in 2022. I met someone who said something that was to change my life forever..."

I’ve been trying to stay humble about it all season, but the evidence is there for all to see. You’re welcome 

  • Like 1
  • Funny 1
Posted
1 hour ago, REDOXO said:

And I’m suggesting it’s not. Any offer and he would be gone if the club had its way. Unless we are holding out for the full fiver it’s unlikely he’s one of those. 
 

Far more likely there have been offers for a player that is currently doing something. If you are looking for players outside of the obvious three I would look at Vyner and Towler who has gone(who knows if he is included in Goulds 4/5) and another one of our youngsters 
 

Then you have a plethora of other players that have value despite being close to contract being up. Bentley and Martin have value despite having six months left. 
 

Massengo right now hasn’t much value.  He’s an under 21 player that no one else wants consistently. The best we can hope IMO is a sell on clause and he turns into the world beater he so obviously isn’t now!
 

 

Fair enough: but the laughing emoji seemed to imply otherwise - that was all I questioned - why it was such a laughable proposition.

I agree he’s got next to no value now with a few months left to run on his contract and with him holding all the cards now too. But I wasn’t  suggesting it might be a sizeable offer - quite the opposite. Gould didn’t say how much - just that we’d had offers.

If he’s going to xx in the summer anyway, xx may well think we’d take a derisory offer just to get him off the wage bill now - and they’d probably be right. 

Posted
1 minute ago, italian dave said:

Fair enough: but the laughing emoji seemed to imply otherwise - that was all I questioned - why it was such a laughable proposition.

I agree he’s got next to no value now with a few months left to run on his contract and with him holding all the cards now too. But I wasn’t  suggesting it might be a sizeable offer - quite the opposite. Gould didn’t say how much - just that we’d had offers.

If he’s going to xx in the summer anyway, xx may well think we’d take a derisory offer just to get him off the wage bill now - and they’d probably be right. 

Dave you have to grow a thicker skin! 
 

Exactly with your comment regarding derisory offers. City would take anything just to have him gone , they haven’t. Leads most to a conclusion to this point I suspect. 
 

I hope the kid goes as soon as possible, for everyone’s sake. He has wasted 18 months of his career, but I guess he’s earning well for now. 

Posted
42 minutes ago, REDOXO said:

Dave you have to grow a thicker skin! 
 

Exactly with your comment regarding derisory offers. City would take anything just to have him gone , they haven’t. Leads most to a conclusion to this point I suspect. 
 

I hope the kid goes as soon as possible, for everyone’s sake. He has wasted 18 months of his career, but I guess he’s earning well for now. 

My money’s still on Scott, Semenyo, Bentley, Towler and Massengo - and in all five we think we can extract a bit more before the window closes. Although I do think Vyner is a good shout too.

But most of my money would be on none of us ever knowing what’s really happened! 

Posted
11 minutes ago, italian dave said:

My money’s still on Scott, Semenyo, Bentley, Towler and Massengo - and in all five we think we can extract a bit more before the window closes. Although I do think Vyner is a good shout too.

But most of my money would be on none of us ever knowing what’s really happened! 

Martin not Massengo is the way I see it. Derby in a promotion chase if they’re allowed to spend anything among others. However anyone offer to get Massengo out gets my vote. 

Posted
1 hour ago, deadredfred said:

I’ve been trying to stay humble about it all season, but the evidence is there for all to see. You’re welcome 

Would you mind having a word with Williams and Bell next...?

  • Funny 1
Posted
2 hours ago, REDOXO said:

Obviously no one Massengo wants to go to has made an offer. IMO not one of the ones referred to by Gould. 
 

if an offer comes in from now on in and Massengo fancies it I’ll drive him/fly him myself

do you have a license to take a fare paying player are you fit to fly and land at night  do yo know where france is?

  • Funny 1
Posted
36 minutes ago, REDOXO said:

Martin not Massengo is the way I see it. Derby in a promotion chase if they’re allowed to spend anything among others. However anyone offer to get Massengo out gets my vote. 

Yep, Martin is a good shout. Maybe even pushes Massengo one down my list! Although I think the same argument that the club would be willing to take almost any offer would apply here too.

I still don’t get the antagonism toward Massengo - but we’ve had that debate elsewhere. 

Posted
1 hour ago, italian dave said:

Yep, Martin is a good shout. Maybe even pushes Massengo one down my list! Although I think the same argument that the club would be willing to take almost any offer would apply here too.

I still don’t get the antagonism toward Massengo - but we’ve had that debate elsewhere. 

He’s not very good. But yeah we have!

Posted
5 hours ago, REDOXO said:

Obviously no one Massengo wants to go to has made an offer. IMO not one of the ones referred to by Gould. 
 

if an offer comes in from now on in and Massengo fancies it I’ll drive him/fly him myself

Nobody would make an offer for HNM unless he had already agrees terms with them beforehand, not gonna happen as any fee a club would offer us will end up being his signing on bonus now anyway.

Posted
9 hours ago, Port Said Red said:

I reckon it's more likely to be a couple of different bids for Scott and Semenyo and maybe one for Bentley.

Scott, Semenyo, Bentley, Massengo, then Towler as the sold player 

  • Like 1
Posted
8 minutes ago, Dolman_Stand said:

Nobody would make an offer for HNM unless he had already agrees terms with them beforehand, not gonna happen as any fee a club would offer us will end up being his signing on bonus now anyway.

That depends on if there is more than one club interested. 
 

I don’t think there is. The conversation earlier was my doubt that he was one of the ones that has an offer 

Posted

As HNM is under 24 and we offered him a new contract, wouldn’t we be eligible for compensation  from his new club?

if so, we would probably hold out for an offer of more than a fiver or a free uber

or am I mistaken?

Posted
24 minutes ago, Paulton Red said:

As HNM is under 24 and we offered him a new contract, wouldn’t we be eligible for compensation  from his new club?

if so, we would probably hold out for an offer of more than a fiver or a free uber

or am I mistaken?

I expect we have offered him a contract of equal standing to his current one, purely to get compo (u24 this country, u23 if he goes elsewhere).

If you search PFCC or RSTP above, you’ll see I’ve written a fair bit about compo schemes.

Posted
13 hours ago, deadredfred said:

I was next to him in cafe Nero in town at the start of the season and said, somewhat creatively.....“have a good season, Zak”.

I think I’m probably partly responsible for his upturn in form. 

I think it’s entirely down to you . 
:sun:

  • Like 1
Posted
13 hours ago, REDOXO said:

He’s not very good. But yeah we have!

I don’t think we’re in a position to judge that. His time here reminds me a lot of Adam Nagy. You don’t get to play more than 50 times for Hungary if you’re “not very good” at second tier level. But we rarely saw much in Nagy that demonstrated that. Because we never gave him a settled role in a settled side. Same with HNM.

Which is why it’s best for all concerned that he move on as quickly as possible. On that I think we’ll agree ?

Posted
1 hour ago, Davefevs said:

@W-S-M Seagullta.  I listened back last night.  20Man is a good interviewer, he put Gould under a lot of pressure with his questions.  Gould was a bit woolly with some if his answers but got pressed and pressed.

Haven't heard the Gould interview, but the grillings he used to give Ashton were worth the licence fee on their own.

Geoff has been involved in football and then journalism for a very long time so I suspect his bullshit detection skills are second to none.

  • Like 3
Posted
6 hours ago, W-S-M Seagull said:

About 70-80% of the way there towards our financial reset

The CEO of a business that had posted unprecedented levels of sales over 5 years of £75m (from just 7 players) now describing progress on a "financial reset" is a simply mind boggling reflection of the level of waste, excess and mismanagement presided over by his predecessor given that income. I know there's an element of Covid in the "reset" but there is no excuse for being in such a perilous state had we invested effectively and not like some kind of supermarket sweep lunatic. It would be easy to say Ipswich's problem now not ours, but clearly we're still paying the price.

  • Like 2
Posted
37 minutes ago, Olé said:

The CEO of a business that had posted unprecedented levels of sales over 5 years of £75m (from just 7 players) now describing progress on a "financial reset" is a simply mind boggling reflection of the level of waste, excess and mismanagement presided over by his predecessor given that income. I know there's an element of Covid in the "reset" but there is no excuse for being in such a perilous state had we invested effectively and not like some kind of supermarket sweep lunatic. It would be easy to say Ipswich's problem now not ours, but clearly we're still paying the price.

We are & I was reflecting on Gould’s “top 10 salaries” comment on my run this morning.

First thought was are we still really doing that?
But on reflection the squad includes Kalas, Bentley, Dasilva, Martin & Massengo all on the wage bill, none of whom for a variety of reasons are starting, almost certain none of which will be with us next season. There is possibly an argument we might offer Kalas something but not even on half what he’s on now, I guess.

Then we are in the last months of Wells higher wages, which is another significant sum, so that’s where a lot of this is tied up, making this summer financially much more like Pearson’s first one when we moved on about 15 players than the one just gone, when 5 went.

  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, GrahamC said:

We are & I was reflecting on Gould’s “top 10 salaries” comment on my run this morning.

First thought was are we still really doing that?
But on reflection the squad includes Kalas, Bentley, Dasilva, Martin & Massengo all on the wage bill, none of whom for a variety of reasons are starting, almost certain none of which will be with us next season. There is possibly an argument we might offer Kalas something but not even on half what he’s on now, I guess.

Then we are in the last months of Wells higher wages, which is another significant sum, so that’s where a lot of this is tied up, making this summer financially much more like Pearson’s first one when we moved on about 15 players than the one just gone, when 5 went.

I think it will be interesting to see where our 2022 wage bill sits when several more clubs announce last seasons accounts.

But as you say whilst we still have players on pre-covid contracts it’s skewing our wage bill. Come this summer we won’t have any players on stupid (for now) deals.

Posted
2 hours ago, italian dave said:

I don’t think we’re in a position to judge that. His time here reminds me a lot of Adam Nagy. You don’t get to play more than 50 times for Hungary if you’re “not very good” at second tier level. But we rarely saw much in Nagy that demonstrated that. Because we never gave him a settled role in a settled side. Same with HNM.

Which is why it’s best for all concerned that he move on as quickly as possible. On that I think we’ll agree ?

HNM has been judged that’s why he doesn’t play. 

Posted
3 hours ago, Davefevs said:

@W-S-M Seagullta.  I listened back last night.  20Man is a good interviewer, he put Gould under a lot of pressure with his questions.  Gould was a bit woolly with some if his answers but got pressed and pressed.

I kinda felt that Gould was a little bit annoyed to be asked certain questions. But Geoff is good. He presses the questions and if he doesn't get a proper answer he'll come back to it later on. 

I think maybe I'd have liked Geoff to ask what we would be doing in this window if no sales occur. 

Posted
28 minutes ago, REDOXO said:

HNM has been judged that’s why he doesn’t play. 

Bentley doesn’t play either. The same Bentley who’s got 250 Championship appearance, 400 league appearances under his belt.

Is he “not very good” too? 

Posted
29 minutes ago, italian dave said:

Bentley doesn’t play either. The same Bentley who’s got 250 Championship appearance, 400 league appearances under his belt.

Is he “not very good” too? 

Bentley is good but out of form. 
 

Massengo is good with little drag backs and put ting his body in the way. But he can’t shoot, pass more than three yards, does not apply assists, doesn’t track back quickly enough,  shanks clearances. Etc etc etc 

if he could do any or all of the above he would be playing despite of his contract situation and someone would have made a tangible offer and he would already be gone.  He isn’t and he’s getting odd games in the U21s 

I’m sorry if people find the facts unpalatable but he doesn’t provide enough. Maybe he will find a club and become the player most thought he was, but on any kind of form he isn’t worth a place in our squad and it seems anyone else’s. 
 

 

  • Like 3
Posted
11 minutes ago, REDOXO said:

Bentley is good but out of form. 
 

Massengo is good with little drag backs and put ting his body in the way. But he can’t shoot, pass more than three yards, does not apply assists, doesn’t track back quickly enough,  shanks clearances. Etc etc etc 

 

 

And yet……100 Championship appearances, and barely 21. 

  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, italian dave said:

And yet……100 Championship appearances, and barely 21. 

Yes.  He looked good at first and added something. However he didn’t develop the way it was thought he might and became superfluous. 
 

However I wish him well wherever he ends up. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...