Nakhi up top?

[glastored]

Surely Wells has to start on Tuesday? Sam Bell may be the future, but I don’t think he’s the one to face Man City for the majority of the game. Bring him on as a sub, by all means, but not from the start.

[steviestevieneville]

1 minute ago, glastored said:

Surely Wells has to start on Tuesday? Sam Bell may be the future, but I don’t think he’s the one to face Man City for the majority of the game. Bring him on as a sub, by all means, but not from the start.

I think Sam will start on the left 

[Big C]

Wells for Mehmeti seems the obvious change

Edited February 26, 2023 by Big C

[Lanterne Rouge]

Although Sam has been on fire in the Cup up to now,

[Sir Colby-Tit]

If anyone has earned a start on Tuesday, it's Sam Bell IMO.

[View from the Dolman]

NP has already said Wells will start. 

 

[Rocking Red Cyril]

Surely he starts with Bell and Wells Tuesday 

[old_eastender]

58 minutes ago, glastored said:

Surely Wells has to start on Tuesday? Sam Bell may be the future, but I don’t think he’s the one to face Man City for the majority of the game. Bring him on as a sub, by all means, but not from the start.

Wells already confirmed by NP will start, as will Sam Bell I'd wager but in his natural position on the LHS as Mehmeti (and Cornick) cup tied.

 

 

[And Its Smith]

one decision as far as I can see.  
 

               Max

Tanner. Vyner. Kalas. Pring

          James.  Williams

MS/AW.   Scott.    Bell

                  Wells

[joe jordans teeth]

5 minutes ago, And Its Smith said:

one decision as far as I can see.  
 

               Max

Tanner. Vyner. Kalas. Pring

          James.  Williams

MS/AW.   Scott.    Bell

                  Wells

Spot on,we haven’t got much choice tbf 

[Lanterne Rouge]

I suppose the only other change could be Jay at LB and push Cam further forward which would mean Sam left on the bench - not really fair on him though.

[Engvall’s Splinter]

20 minutes ago, And Its Smith said:

one decision as far as I can see.  
 

               Max

Tanner. Vyner. Kalas. Pring

          James.  Williams

MS/AW.   Scott.    Bell

                  Wells

Sykes over Weimann for me. 

[Port Said Red]

20 minutes ago, Engvall’s Splinter said:

Sykes over Weimann for me. 

Anyone know what was behind the switch move Ng Sykes to right back? Just Tanner tiring a little?

[steviestevieneville]

45 minutes ago, And Its Smith said:

one decision as far as I can see.  
 

               Max

Tanner. Vyner. Kalas. Pring

          James.  Williams

MS/AW.   Scott.    Bell

                  Wells

Sykes deserves to keep his place imo. 

[Numero Uno]

14 minutes ago, Port Said Red said:

Anyone know what was behind the switch move Ng Sykes to right back? Just Tanner tiring a little?

Think the Hull sub started going past Tanner a bit too easily.

[Davefevs]

33 minutes ago, Port Said Red said:

Anyone know what was behind the switch move Ng Sykes to right back? Just Tanner tiring a little?

Think he’d done his job on containing Ebiowei, who’d gone off, plus they swapped to a 442, and using Tetteh to find Longman.  Bit of fresh legs in Cornick in front of a Duracell Sykes.

[E.G.Red]

Just an aside and sorry to be pedantic can we spell Nahkis  name correctly. It's Nahki not Nakhi.

[glastored]

2 minutes ago, E.G.Red said:

Just an aside and sorry to be pedantic can we spell Nahkis  name correctly. It's Nahki not Nakhi.

You’re quite right. Sorry about that! Nahki it is then!

[steviestevieneville]

2 hours ago, Rocking Red Cyril said:

Surely he starts with Bell and Wells Tuesday 

We don’t play with two up front . It’ll either be a front 3 of bell , wells & Sykes/wiemann or a 4231 . I think he’ll go 433 with Scott dropping a few yards deeper . We’ll get overran otherwise . We’ll see Tuesday 

[Henry]

I wouldn’t be surprised to see Weimann to come in and play LF.

I think Pearson might want his experience and stamina to help Pring out.

[steviestevieneville]

3 minutes ago, Henry said:

I wouldn’t be surprised to see Weimann to come in and play LF.

I think Pearson might want his experience and stamina to help Pring out.

I would . 

[1960maaan]

3 hours ago, Port Said Red said:

Anyone know what was behind the switch move Ng Sykes to right back? Just Tanner tiring a little?

I'm probably reading too much into it , but ....

We have more options forward, Weimann will be chomping at the bit to play. Tanner is our only RB so if he was tiring , and even if not , it made sense to rest him. He will start V Man C where Sykes may not have too . 

Not many decisions to make for Nige, we have 
1 RB , 2 CB's , 2 LB's so defence picks itself.
Few options in MF , 4 or 5 to choose from ?
and 4 into 3 for the front 3.

Bet Man City don't have these problems.

[AppyDAZE]

2 hours ago, E.G.Red said:

Just an aside and sorry to be pedantic can we spell Nahkis  name correctly. It's Nahki not Nakhi.

Nahki's name 

[Sir Colby-Tit]

Saw Wells the other day, looking really mugged off, throwing around a brown key fob.

Narky Nahki's khaki car keys.

[mozo]

11 minutes ago, Sir Colby-Tit said:

Saw Wells the other day, looking really mugged off, throwing around a brown key fob.

Narky Nahki's khaki car keys.

I saw a City player looking cross as he picked pieces of paper out of his dinner.

Turns out someone had thrown confetti in Mehmeti's spaghetti...

[Superjack]

5 hours ago, View from the Dolman said:

NP has already said Wells will start. 

 

Bullshit.

He might start. 

[real_bristol]

6 hours ago, glastored said:

Surely Wells has to start on Tuesday? Sam Bell may be the future, but I don’t think he’s the one to face Man City for the majority of the game. Bring him on as a sub, by all means, but not from the start.

I’d rather see Bell get big game experience. 

[Davefevs]

4 minutes ago, real_bristol said:

I’d rather see Bell get big game experience. 

I’m sure he’ll start too.