Jump to content
IGNORED

Garry O'Neil.


Recommended Posts

21 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

It’s a disgrace that’s not a penalty.  Unforgivable.

Anyone who seriously thinks games are refereed without bias at Old Trafford & Anfield then I’ve got some magic beans I’d like to sell you.

United have been benefiting from home town decisions back since Ferguson was first allowed to bully referees with impunity.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Davefevs said:

It’s a disgrace that’s not a penalty.  Unforgivable.

Agree wholeheartedly.

Dodgy decisions in favour of Man U seems to be a given.

Not surprised O'Neil had a hissy fit. 

Impressed by Wolves slick passing and movement, and also the direct runs from deep towards United's goal, but they just can't put the ball in the net.

United did not deserve anything from that game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Should be a review system, one per manager per game. PNE could have reviewed the Vyner penalty (which was a pen) , we could review the foul on Bell Saturday (shoved over clear as day), and wolves could appeal the pen tonight. Really easy.

Edited by ChrisBW
  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ChrisBW said:

Should be a review system, one per manager per game. PNE could have reviewed the Vyner penalty (which was a pen) , we could review the foul on Bell Saturday (shoved over clear as day), and wolves could appeal the pen tonight. Really easy.

Why would it make a difference when VAR, which reviews every incident, gets it wrong ?

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ChrisBW said:

Should be a review system, one per manager per game. PNE could have reviewed the Vyner penalty (which was a pen) , we could review the foul on Bell Saturday (shoved over clear as day), and wolves could appeal the pen tonight. Really easy.

The Wolves one was reviewed...

What's the solution when the review is wrong?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Red Army 75 said:

I thought the ref was running over to look at the screen then give the pen. 

Ran over to the Man U bench to run the decision by them more like.

As I think ha s already been said, you can perhaps excuse the refs original decision as he only saw it once in real time. For VAR to have the benefit of slo-mo and from various angles and still not give it is inexplicable - the VAR equivalent of Fergie time!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, phantom said:

It was mentioned it was being introduced but it obviously hasn't been 

Surely it's the VAR team guiding the ref? 

The very definition of the blind leading the blind .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...