Jump to content
IGNORED

Yeovil's New Badge


exAtyeoMax

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Silvio Dante said:

Apparently they employed a special consultant on the rebrand:

 

IMG_2444.jpeg

https://www.shutterstock.com/image-vector/support-present-charity-concept-modern-vector-2210758007?utm_campaign=image&utm_medium=googleimages&utm_source=schema

probably! 

Screenshot 2024-01-30 at 16.08.29.png

Edited by exAtyeoMax
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was a big fan of us switching to the robin at the time but now after a few years I wish we’d stuck with the City crest. I wonder how many fans of clubs that have recently rebranded feel the same.

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Making it simpler and more recognisable is good, IMO the best badge is Nottingham Forest - bold, distinctive and instantly recognisable.

 

188px-Nottingham_Forest_F.C._logo.svg.pn

 

The worst would be something like Barnsley's which is ridiculously complicated and blurs into one at a distance.

 

548px-Barnsley_FC.svg.png?20180531190513

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I prefer it to the old badges but that may be because I don't like the old badges. I've find heraldry-type badges - if that's the best way to describe them - a bit over-stylised and uninteresting. Similarly I much before our current badge to the last one for the same reason. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Eddie Hitler said:

Making it simpler and more recognisable is good, IMO the best badge is Nottingham Forest - bold, distinctive and instantly recognisable.

 

188px-Nottingham_Forest_F.C._logo.svg.pn

 

The worst would be something like Barnsley's which is ridiculously complicated and blurs into one at a distance.

 

548px-Barnsley_FC.svg.png?20180531190513

 

Interesting - personally I find the Forest one very dated. I’m sure it was a leader when it was new, but it shouts 1970s to me. And I’m an OAP.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Leveller said:

Interesting - personally I find the Forest one very dated. I’m sure it was a leader when it was new, but it shouts 1970s to me. And I’m an OAP.

Is that with or without the ear trumpet 🤣🤣🤣

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Eddie Hitler said:

Making it simpler and more recognisable is good, IMO the best badge is Nottingham Forest - bold, distinctive and instantly recognisable.

 

188px-Nottingham_Forest_F.C._logo.svg.pn

 

The worst would be something like Barnsley's which is ridiculously complicated and blurs into one at a distance.

 

548px-Barnsley_FC.svg.png?20180531190513

 

I'm old and old fashioned so I  disagree to some extent. What Forest have, and what many have including us, is not so much a badge as a logo. What Barnsley have on their shirt is a proper badge that honours the club's history. Personally I think clubs should have both. For simplicity of design for replica shirts have a logo but for official correspondence the letterhead should sport a badge. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, exAtyeoMax said:

It's the hands I don't like, looks a bit religious / charity - like.

No; they're catching to prevent further falling down the leagues.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, RoystonFoote'snephew said:

I'm old and old fashioned so I  disagree to some extent. What Forest have, and what many have including us, is not so much a badge as a logo. What Barnsley have on their shirt is a proper badge that honours the club's history. Personally I think clubs should have both. For simplicity of design for replica shirts have a logo but for official correspondence the letterhead should sport a badge. 

 

Yes, I agree with that.

I like the Bristol coat of arms but I prefer having an instantly recognisable logo on the shirt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Eddie Hitler said:

Making it simpler and more recognisable is good, IMO the best badge is Nottingham Forest - bold, distinctive and instantly recognisable.

 

188px-Nottingham_Forest_F.C._logo.svg.pn

 

The worst would be something like Barnsley's which is ridiculously complicated and blurs into one at a distance.

 

548px-Barnsley_FC.svg.png?20180531190513

 

That’s. Why I like city’s new badge a very simple design and not to busy 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On first impressions I quite like it. 

Our badge is growing on me, but I still wish it would have incorporated the Suspension Bridge (like the tweaked versions of the design by posters on this forum at the time). 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good evening all, I'm sorry but looking at that line up, I think a draw is all we can hope for. Coventry are on form, but hopefully we can score from a break, without Tommy though, it will be difficult, So prove me wrong boys and Come On You Red's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like it and I like the way they’ve explained it in the video. Especially this bit.

City and their red and white stripes, yellow kit, black kit with purple and lime, blue training wear, splat robin, club crest, and 500 different typefaces across their media output…could learn a lot from this.

BD83C9B1-03EF-4EAE-BE74-71CE84F15B0C.jpeg

Edited by ChippenhamRed
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a new badge in the new badge style. its a simplified new badge style. Fine. 

What I don't get is this badge to represent club identity.

What a load of tosh. It's a badge. So many more things represent a club's Identity. And I just feel the badge does diddly squat to that.

Just my opinion 👷

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally I must admit to preferring the clean “simple” badge. I challenge anybody to say that the current Sheffield Wednesday badge is better than the previous one.

Current badge:

IMG_5006.thumb.png.57714e7618a56d4896a3606340379286.png

Previous badge:

IMG_5007.png.fd606ff43ed23bfed647e428e8907b0b.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...