GrahamC Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 4 minutes ago, Rudy said: If we get extra time that's more subs so it's potentially half a game they're playing Exactly this. We can still make two more inside the 90 & if it went to extra time, a further one. Just worth pointing out though that after Wells the next most experienced sub left is Taylor-Clarke, who didn’t have a squad number at the start of the week. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redrob Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 34 minutes ago, Ivorguy said: Yes, but obviously not the part the ball went in! No he was where the ball was going before it was turned in by (insert somebody's body part). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mozo Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 Forest have had only had 2 shots on target with 15 minutes to go. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bredwood Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 2 minutes ago, 1891 B.C. Sweden said: Sounds like the game turned in favour of Nottingham since our triple sub They've brought on their first teamers so that's more likely to be the reason 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
transfer reader Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 10 minutes ago, Atlanta_Red said: I’m sure I heard that VAR wouldn’t be used if it wasn’t available at both venues. Am I right in thinking West Ham didn’t use it because we wouldn’t be able to have it in any replay? Maybe I’m confused. That was the rules in the league cup semi finals. FA Cup uses VAR at the ground of Prem sides. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Popodopolous Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 Just now, bredwood said: They've brought on their first teamers so that's more likely to be the reason Bit of both probably. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1891 B.C. Sweden Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 2 minutes ago, Banjo Island said: Our subs rarely make an impact True Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cityexile Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 We certainly sound to have lost some flow after the run of subs, but in fairness that is likely as much to be that they have brought on some strong players as much as ours. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
YorkshireSection Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 Just now, Curr Avon said: Banned. Banned, hes not an XL BULLY ffs! Hes suspended 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Popodopolous Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 2 minutes ago, mozo said: We didn't have another left back to be fair! Then why make the change. Or why make the change at that point..feels a tad disruptive and needlessly so. 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curr Avon Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 Just now, YorkshireSection said: Banned, hes not an XL BULLY ffs! Hes suspended Sorry. Its the first word that came into my head! 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
downendcity Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 7 minutes ago, downendcity said: Ref: Need a VAR review of the Forest goal VAR team: Sorry we were watching the Villa Chelsea game but Forest are the premier league team so OK to allow it! Ref: Need a VAR review of a possible penalty to Bristol City. VAR team: Sorry we're still watching the VIlla Chelsea game and have seen a great free kick, but Bristol City are not a premier league team, and it's Bristol City so no penalty! 2 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gert Mare Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 Just now, cityexile said: We certainly sound to have lost some flow after the run of subs, but in fairness that is likely as much to be that they have brought on some strong players as much as ours. Generally we just run out of steam and ideas 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lanterne Rouge Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 1 minute ago, bredwood said: They've brought on their first teamers so that's more likely to be the reason This. All their (available) big guns are on now. They don`t want ET. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Atyeo's lift Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 1 minute ago, YorkshireSection said: Banned, hes not an XL BULLY ffs! Hes suspended You've not seen him recently then 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gert Mare Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 Forest cranking it up now 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big C Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 1 minute ago, Mr Popodopolous said: Then why make the change. Or why make the change at that point..feels a tad disruptive and needlessly so. because Roberts hasn't played for almost 4 months 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curr Avon Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 Knight Lebel coming on for McCrorie shortly. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
!james Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 1 minute ago, Mr Popodopolous said: Then why make the change. Or why make the change at that point..feels a tad disruptive and needlessly so. Roberts hasn't played since October. Wasn't ever going to play a full 90 or more 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rudy Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 Not sure how to feel about our attack completely changing every single game Pros: .The players are refreshed .The opposition players aren't used to how they play Cons: .They aren't warmed up so they won't start to sharp .They're B team players low championship quality at highest usually What are your thoughts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mozo Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 1 minute ago, Mr Popodopolous said: Then why make the change. Or why make the change at that point..feels a tad disruptive and needlessly so. Because its difficult for Roberts to sustain more than 60 minutes with so little football in his legs 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Betty Swallocks Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 1 minute ago, Mr Popodopolous said: Then why make the change. Or why make the change at that point..feels a tad disruptive and needlessly so. Because this was Robert’s first game back from fitness, maybe? 60 minutes is pretty standard for a first game back. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cityexile Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 For the first time really, sounding like we are starting to soak up some pressure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
old_eastender Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 Still no sign of a winner at the City Ground. Into the final 10 minutes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
petehinton Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 Yessss Jamie knight-lebel 1 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lew-T Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 Could do without ET. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Rs Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 Just now, petehinton said: Yessss Jamie knight-lebel He scored? Didn’t think he was on the pitch but fair enough some achievement 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Curr Avon Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 Just now, Lew-T said: Could do without ET. He's phoned home. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rudy Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 Oh my Nottingham Forest have just had a great counter attack but sounds like he's missed a sitter 1 on 1 with Max Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Posted February 7 Report Share Posted February 7 Just now, petehinton said: Yessss Jamie knight-lebel Thought he'd scored ffs! 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.