Jump to content
IGNORED

Mauricio Pochettino leaves Chelsea by mutual agreement after one season


Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, Barrs Court Red said:

Lucky he wasn’t sacked sooner. 

6 in the league. Runners up Carabo,  semi finals FA Cup. Basket case of a club. Not sure I expected too much more from him in first season. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, petehinton said:

Most overrated manager in world football currently imo. 

No way. Just a couple of really bad choices post-Spurs.

PSG and Chelsea both basket cases with nutty owners. 

I mean PSG, a genuinely vile club from top to bottom, and Boehly at Chelsea is just a complete buffoon. 

  • Like 15
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Kid in the Riot said:

No way. Just a couple of really bad choices post-Spurs.

PSG and Chelsea both basket cases with nutty owners. 

I mean PSG, a genuinely vile club from top to bottom, and Boehly at Chelsea is just a complete buffoon. 

I honestly just don’t get it with him. Would be surprised if he’s not United manager by Christmas to completely the trilogy though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely he can’t go to Man United?

After how bad it’s gone at PSG and Chelsea, he’d want to play safe with his next job…

Man United is absolutely not a safe job😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, W-S-M Seagull said:

Proof that spending money doesn't = success. 

Poch spent 400 million in his short time there. 

 

Not really, he didn't get a say in recruitment, one of the main reasons he left. The two Sporting Directors have the control and any manager will have to accept that.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Jerseybean said:

Largely a list of available managers plucked out of the air.

According to Jacob Steinberg in The Guardian they want a young coach willing to toe the line so McKenna is the target.

They don't think Amorim is a tactical fit and De Zerbi left Brighton for the same reason Poch left Chelsea. None of the others would accept not being in control either.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Their transfer strategy meant it was always going to take time to gel, since half way point think they’ve been 5th in the form table, things were turning around and now more chaos. Whoever goes in will surely want their stamp on it but they’ve got players on 6/7 year contracts 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, W-S-M Seagull said:

Proof that spending money doesn't = success. 

Poch spent 400 million in his short time there. 

 

No, he didn't - and that's the point. He wanted a different sort of player brought in. But transfers were outside his control.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, SecretSam said:

No, he didn't - and that's the point. He wanted a different sort of player brought in. But transfers were outside his control.

Chelsea still spent 400 million this season which blows apart the theory that spending money = success. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...