Robbored Posted December 17, 2003 Report Share Posted December 17, 2003 So far this season Wilson has ; (1) Persisted with the Burnell/Docherty combination for far to long.Everyone but Wilson could see it was far too defensive. (2)Persisted to play Wilkshire out of position also for far to long.Yet again it was obvious to everyone that he was out of position. (3) Continued to play Miller/Peacock up front when its obvious to everyone but Wilson that they aren't compatable. (4)Refused so far to give Roberts a run of games along side Miller up front.Almost eveyone sees that combo as the best one. (5)Continued after Saturday with Clist on the right of midfield when everyone could see that it didn't suite Clist.So Wilson does it again just three days later. Too many errors for my liking. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Eddie Hitler Posted December 17, 2003 Report Share Posted December 17, 2003 Just like the Incider's cartoon has it with the crowd saying "Well D'uh!" We're not all football experts, we'd be hard put to say whether we should be playing 4-4-2, 3-5-2, sweeper etc. But as you say there are so many apparently obvious things being done wrongly for so long that you have to wonder why? Stubborness? Playing favourites? It is bizzare at times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
94th Minute Posted December 17, 2003 Report Share Posted December 17, 2003 Why cant we have Roberts /Miller and Peacock Because that would leave Miller Peacock upfront on some occasions and that doesnt work Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Eddie Hitler Posted January 16, 2004 Report Share Posted January 16, 2004 Works well enough for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pogue mahone Posted January 16, 2004 Report Share Posted January 16, 2004 works good for me as well eddie. can i ask the roberts/miller partnership enthusiasts who they expect to score the goals ? peacock, even when playing badly, looks more likely to score than both roberts and miller combined. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StapleHillPhil Posted January 16, 2004 Report Share Posted January 16, 2004 Robbored, A simple question for a simple man/creative genius who loves the wind up. Do you love causing mischief or is this a serious question? You know damn well that the Wilson/Player apologists will back anything they do whilst Lee Peacocks short comings have been debated at length on a fairly recent thread. Do you just love seeing your name in lights? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taz Posted January 16, 2004 Report Share Posted January 16, 2004 So far this season Wilson has ; (1) Persisted with the Burnell/Docherty combination for far to long.Everyone but Wilson could see it was far too defensive. (2)Persisted to play Wilkshire out of position also for far to long.Yet again it was obvious to everyone that he was out of position. (3) Continued to play Miller/Peacock up front when its obvious to everyone but Wilson that they aren't compatable. (4)Refused so far to give Roberts a run of games along side Miller up front.Almost eveyone sees that combo as the best one. (5)Continued after Saturday with Clist on the right of midfield when everyone could see that it didn't suite Clist.So Wilson does it again just three days later. Too many errors for my liking. No ###### Sherlock This has only been mentioned once, twice, no three, actually I've track of how often these points have been raised in the past few months. I've been trying to see the logic in this post, but unfortunately I have been unable to see any. Wilson can on occasions can appear stubborn, frustrating, and a twit. Like I've said I'm completely lost on this one :Confused13: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingswoodRed Posted January 16, 2004 Report Share Posted January 16, 2004 I'd love to reply Robbored, but feel unworthy as I am only part time therefore I have no opinion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
screech Posted January 16, 2004 Report Share Posted January 16, 2004 Check the date this was first posted guys, someone has dug this one up from the oldie posts, Robbored hasn't posted this recently, he posted this in December! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StapleHillPhil Posted January 16, 2004 Report Share Posted January 16, 2004 Check the date this was first posted guys, someone has dug this one up from the oldie posts, Robbored hasn't posted this recently, he posted this in December! So it is! Just goes to show that I expect this level of 'informed debate' from Robbored's keyboard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingswoodRed Posted January 16, 2004 Report Share Posted January 16, 2004 Fair play. I fell for it too. I apologise, but Southern Comfort & Blackthorn have to take some of the blame too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Taz Posted January 16, 2004 Report Share Posted January 16, 2004 Check the date this was first posted guys, someone has dug this one up from the oldie posts, Robbored hasn't posted this recently, he posted this in December! *Ahem* Apologies. That would explain something then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest pogue mahone Posted January 16, 2004 Report Share Posted January 16, 2004 so what ? i still stand by anything that i posted in december Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.