Bristol Boy Posted September 18, 2005 Report Share Posted September 18, 2005 3-5-1-1...............................................PHILLIPS.............................................................................SKUSE..................HEYWOOD.................PARTRIDGE......................ORR............BROWN.................WILKSHIRE..................SMITH...........WOODMAN................................................COTTERILL.......................................................................................................STEWART..........................................................SUBSBRIDGESGILLESPIERUSSELLCAREYGKAssuming Brooker's still out for the next two at least. A no nonsense, solid, away, hit 'em on the break, formation to deny Forest width and not allow them to play through us.Skuse's extra pace at the back and better passing and distribution, should help Heywood and Orr is no slouch or midget, either.The two best games I've seen Orr have were as a substitute right back, so why not give him a try and transfer list Smith.Another rick of Tinnions was to sign him for another year.Cotterill can get the ball facing goal and run at the them.The only downside is no height up front and perhaps that'll help to make us pass it instead of BOOT IT!!!Millen?4-4-2 and another defeat with Murray & Carey both starting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest roejowland Posted September 18, 2005 Report Share Posted September 18, 2005 that formation sux Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bristol Boy Posted September 18, 2005 Author Report Share Posted September 18, 2005 that formation sux←How very educated.Off to bed, it's back to school tomorrow Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmersonsKev Posted September 18, 2005 Report Share Posted September 18, 2005 Where has Alex Russell apeared from? or we putting injured players on the bench now? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BCFC Grim Posted September 18, 2005 Report Share Posted September 18, 2005 it looks good, especially for an away game, its just we need to keep the same team for a few games, agree? I think that has been the problem this season no consistence in the team. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robins_til_i_die Posted September 18, 2005 Report Share Posted September 18, 2005 Heres Mine -----------------Phillips-------------------------Keogh--Heywood--Partridge--------Cotteril--Skuse--Brown--G Smith-------------------Bridges-----------------------------Gillespie--Stewart-----------SUBS-Birch-Carey-Wilkshire-Woodman-Russell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest roejowland Posted September 18, 2005 Report Share Posted September 18, 2005 mine? if i was manager:phillipscarey heywood partridge woodmanbrown skuse wilkshirebridges gillespie stewart Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ron Posted September 18, 2005 Report Share Posted September 18, 2005 If I was manager;---------------------Phillips--------------------Orr---Heywood---Keogh---Partridge---Smith----------Brown----Skuse----Wilkshire--------------------------------Bridges-------------------------------Cotterill----------------------------Has defensive qualities, which we will need when travelling to a team who really do have good attacking qualities no matter how they are doing, but a chance to play on the counter with a creative midfield and a link-up striker, which may be needed as at the moment everyone is dropping too deep, if we have 1 striker & one link-up then I think it would work better. Orr & Smith to provide us some width, but their defensive qualities will help them defensively. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nibor Posted September 18, 2005 Report Share Posted September 18, 2005 ............................Phillips.................................................Keogh......Heywood....Partridge.....................Orr.....Skuse.....Brown....Wilkshire.....Smith..........................Stewart.......Gillespie..........................SubsBurchCareyMurrayBridgesCotterill Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave L Posted September 18, 2005 Report Share Posted September 18, 2005 Welch, Llewellyn, Scott .... oh no, hang on .... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbored Posted September 18, 2005 Report Share Posted September 18, 2005 Availability allowing - Millen should pick the same squad as he did fo Saturday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MT1 Posted September 18, 2005 Report Share Posted September 18, 2005 Availability allowing - Millen should pick the same squad as he did fo Saturday.←Sorry to interrupt on this threadI was a City season ticket holder for years, but since moving to the Midlands have been watching Forest with friends - just interested to know how many fans you will be bringing to Nottingham?Good luck for Tuesday!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
we8gas Posted September 18, 2005 Report Share Posted September 18, 2005 Heres Mine -----------------Phillips-------------------------Keogh--Heywood--Partridge--------Cotteril--Skuse--Brown--G Smith-------------------Bridges-----------------------------Gillespie--Stewart-----------SUBS-Birch-Carey-Wilkshire-Woodman-Russell←Looks very good Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xerox6060 Posted September 18, 2005 Report Share Posted September 18, 2005 Feel we'll see Carey at centre half for the injured Heywood and Jamie Smith at right back, otherwise unchanged. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colemanballs Posted September 18, 2005 Report Share Posted September 18, 2005 Availability allowing - Millen should pick the same squad as he did fo Saturday.←Totally agree, though I'd start with Orr for Carey unless Heyward is injured in which case, Orr for Heyward with Carey moving into the middle and Orr at RB. I'd also think about starting Cotterill in place of Murray but, for the sake of continuity I'd probably resist that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bristol Boy Posted September 18, 2005 Author Report Share Posted September 18, 2005 Where has Alex Russell apeared from? or we putting injured players on the bench now?←I spoke to Alex after the Colchester game.He said he'D be back in two weeks and was already training.Try asking a civil question before acting like a smarta$$ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swindon Hater Posted September 18, 2005 Report Share Posted September 18, 2005 What makes me laugh about this thread is, the management are always being moaned at for not keeping a consistent side, a side that can gel together, once again everyone wants to bring in different player. Why not just keep the same bloody team for a change and let them work together for a few games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bristol Boy Posted September 18, 2005 Author Report Share Posted September 18, 2005 Availability allowing - Millen should pick the same squad as he did fo Saturday.←The same team would loose both of our next away games.No height up front is one thing but no height AND pace is something else Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dagest Posted September 18, 2005 Report Share Posted September 18, 2005 Perhaps Madjo will get a go on the bench for Tuesday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bristol Boy Posted September 18, 2005 Author Report Share Posted September 18, 2005 What makes me laugh about this thread is, the management are always being moaned at for not keeping a consistent side, a side that can gel together, once again everyone wants to bring in different player. Why not just keep the same bloody team for a change and let them work together for a few games.←That's a valid point.Trouble is, playing at home with little or no confidence is one thing because the opposition will normally settle for a point.Playing away is entirely different and we need a side that can sit in when the pressure's on, not capitulate and cave in, like we did at Swansea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bristol Boy Posted September 18, 2005 Author Report Share Posted September 18, 2005 Perhaps Madjo will get a go on the bench for Tuesday.←Can't do any harm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bristol Boy Posted September 18, 2005 Author Report Share Posted September 18, 2005 just interested to know how many fans you will be bringing to Nottingham?Good luck for Tuesday!!!←I reckon 450-800 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bristol Boy Posted September 18, 2005 Author Report Share Posted September 18, 2005 ............................Phillips.................................................Keogh......Heywood....Partridge.....................Orr.....Skuse.....Brown....Wilkshire.....Smith..........................Stewart.......Gillespie..........................SubsBurchCareyMurrayBridgesCotterill←Decent shape and well worth a try.It'll be 4-4-2 though, with Murray & Carey, wait and see Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nibor Posted September 18, 2005 Report Share Posted September 18, 2005 Decent shape and well worth a try.It'll be 4-4-2 though, with Murray & Carey, wait and see ←Yep I suspect you're right.Which means even a 90 yr old grandmother on the left wing will have a field day for Forest, and that we will lack any sort of service down the right.Nibor Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colemanballs Posted September 18, 2005 Report Share Posted September 18, 2005 That's a valid point.Trouble is, playing at home with little or no confidence is one thing because the opposition will normally settle for a point.Playing away is entirely different and we need a side that can sit in when the pressure's on, not capitulate and cave in, like we did at Swansea.←I do find these threads entertaining and interesting but you seem to go for a different 11 every game. Teams that do well in this division tend to be relatively unchanged from week to week and play in the same formation home and away. That way they get to play as a team. For that reason alone, I would make minimal changes to last Saturday's starting line-up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greenun Posted September 18, 2005 Report Share Posted September 18, 2005 3-5-1-1...............................................PHILLIPS.............................................................................SKUSE..................HEYWOOD.................PARTRIDGE......................ORR............BROWN.................WILKSHIRE..................SMITH...........WOODMAN................................................COTTERILL.......................................................................................................STEWART..........................................................SUBSBRIDGESGILLESPIERUSSELLCAREYGKAssuming Brooker's still out for the next two at least. A no nonsense, solid, away, hit 'em on the break, formation to deny Forest width and not allow them to play through us.Skuse's extra pace at the back and better passing and distribution, should help Heywood and Orr is no slouch or midget, either.The two best games I've seen Orr have were as a substitute right back, so why not give him a try and transfer list Smith.Another rick of Tinnions was to sign him for another year.Cotterill can get the ball facing goal and run at the them.The only downside is no height up front and perhaps that'll help to make us pass it instead of BOOT IT!!!Millen?4-4-2 and another defeat with Murray & Carey both starting ←Crikey Bristol Boy! Picking Cotterill in his favoured forward position, and demonstrating common sense with a balanced side? Are you mad man? On THIS forum?I'd go for that line-up like a shot BB, but fear we'll have to put up with Murray and Carey, therefore utilising our 9 men, against Forest's 11. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chivs Posted September 18, 2005 Report Share Posted September 18, 2005 Phillips (but only because I can't remember the name of the loanee) Orr Heywood Keogh Partridge Cotterill Skuse Brown Smith Gillespie Brooker (if fit else Bridges (or at least anyone but Stewart))4-4-2 is the only formation that these players can play. This team retains the core of the Saturday team for consistency but gets rid of the old-timers, Carey, Murray and Stewart. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest scrumpy dare Posted September 18, 2005 Report Share Posted September 18, 2005 Heres Mine -----------------Phillips-------------------------Keogh--Heywood--Partridge--------Cotteril--Skuse--Brown--G Smith-------------------Bridges-----------------------------Gillespie--Stewart-----------SUBS-Birch-Carey-Wilkshire-Woodman-Russell←thats better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest scrumpy dare Posted September 18, 2005 Report Share Posted September 18, 2005 mine? if i was manager:phillipscarey heywood partridge woodmanbrown skuse wilkshirebridges gillespie stewart←cotteril? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest halelee Posted September 19, 2005 Report Share Posted September 19, 2005 this should be the team manager graham taylor get new assistant manager phillips orr heywood partridge carey cotterill wilkshire murray bridges gillespie madjosubsskusestewart g smithkeoghwoodmanalso when time comes transferlistclayton furtune (worst player ever seen belongs up the downs on saturdays)scott golbourne (greedy & loses ball to much(my be to young needs more time) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.