Tunley Legend Posted September 19, 2005 Report Share Posted September 19, 2005 I could not believe the comment that was attributed to our Chairman in today's Evening Post. Apparently the 90 minutes on offer Saturday represented "a good game of football".I agree that it was a small improvement on the previous fare we have endured under Tinnion and I have said this on other threads but to call that a good game defies all logic and belief. Yes, there were a couple of moments from Gillespie, Orr looked different gravy when he replaced Hoofer at Right Back and there were one or two moments from Blackpool but overall the game represented a very poor advert for professional football, even at Third Division level. For a continuous twenty minutes in the second half you could have went to sleep and not missed a single piece of worthwhile action.If Saturday is the benchmark by which Steve Lansdown judges a "good" game of football then, as supporters, we should all be very worried. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS3_RED Posted September 19, 2005 Report Share Posted September 19, 2005 I could not believe the comment that was attributed to our Chairman in today's Evening Post. Apparently the 90 minutes on offer Saturday represented "a good game of football".I agree that it was a small improvement on the previous fare we have endured under Tinnion and I have said this on other threads but to call that a good game defies all logic and belief. Yes, there were a couple of moments from Gillespie, Orr looked different gravy when he replaced Hoofer at Right Back and there were one or two moments from Blackpool but overall the game represented a very poor advert for professional football, even at Third Division level. For a continuous twenty minutes in the second half you could have went to sleep and not missed a single piece of worthwhile action.If Saturday is the benchmark by which Steve Lansdown judges a "good" game of football then, as supporters, we should all be very worried.←don't even get me started on Lansdown.....Everyone talks about what a great chairman he is but i disagree, I think he's a crap chairman who now only cares about trying to get some return on the money he has put into City.And before everyone tells me that without him the club would go bust i will say this......... One of the reasons we are in so much debt is because of his p1ss poor decisions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
citynut54 Posted September 19, 2005 Report Share Posted September 19, 2005 don't even get me started on Lansdown.....Everyone talks about what a great chairman he is but i disagree, I think he's a crap chairman who now only cares about trying to get some return on the money he has put into City.And before everyone tells me that without him the club would go bust i will say this......... One of the reasons we are in so much debt is because of his p1ss poor decisions.←Do everyone on here a favour and GET YOURSELF A LIFE !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS3_RED Posted September 19, 2005 Report Share Posted September 19, 2005 Do everyone on here a favour and GET YOURSELF A LIFE !!←Why do everyone a favour? Are you that stupid to think that everyone thinks like you. ###### Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mundz18 Posted September 19, 2005 Report Share Posted September 19, 2005 i`ve been putting money into city in various ways for 40 years, when can i have my money out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS3_RED Posted September 19, 2005 Report Share Posted September 19, 2005 i`ve been putting money into city in various ways for 40 years, when can i have my money out.←Good luck!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mozo Posted September 19, 2005 Report Share Posted September 19, 2005 I love it when it gets rowdy!Back to the point, I thought there were less promising attacks than in some of tinnions games this season. I thought we looked very disjointed on saturday for a home team playing a very ordinary blackpool. Obviously I'm happier than after Swansea, but it was a dire game in fairness. For long periods the crowd were so bored that they lost interest in even complaining. It was league 2 football by all accounts (I went to a few basement games last season). It can only improve when the new boss is in though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
England Posted September 19, 2005 Report Share Posted September 19, 2005 don't even get me started on Lansdown.....Everyone talks about what a great chairman he is but i disagree, I think he's a crap chairman who now only cares about trying to get some return on the money he has put into City.And before everyone tells me that without him the club would go bust i will say this......... One of the reasons we are in so much debt is because of his p1ss poor decisions.←Sad to say - but well said that man and the worry is that he still doesn't see he made a pigs #ss of things Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest MaloneFM Posted September 19, 2005 Report Share Posted September 19, 2005 He's right.It was a good game of football. See from the directors box you can see over the top of the Atyeo and watch the game going on the Ashton park.From the MaloneFM commentary box I was watching the same one. CRACKING!Better than the one in front of me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tunley Legend Posted September 19, 2005 Author Report Share Posted September 19, 2005 He's right.It was a good game of football. See from the directors box you can see over the top of the Atyeo and watch the game going on the Ashton park.From the MaloneFM commentary box I was watching the same one. CRACKING!Better than the one in front of me.←The worst thing about the above is that it actually makes sense!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mundz18 Posted September 19, 2005 Report Share Posted September 19, 2005 do our chairman and board pay to get into the gate or for away games, do they buy city shirts ect, do they buy a burger and tea at the match. they just bung some big amount of cash, in, when needed, and take it back out when its right for them. i can`t do that. but i`m still here and i`ll be there in years to come. will they ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest MaloneFM Posted September 19, 2005 Report Share Posted September 19, 2005 The worst thing about the above is that it actually makes sense!!!←See? Voice of sport and all that...HAH! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS3_RED Posted September 19, 2005 Report Share Posted September 19, 2005 do our chairman and board pay to get into the gate or for away games, do they buy city shirts ect, do they buy a burger and tea at the match. they just bung some big amount of cash, in, when needed, and take it back out when its right for them. i can`t do that. but i`m still here and i`ll be there in years to come. will they ?←And don't forget that when Lansdown so kindly puts money into the club IT IS NOT A GIFT, its is a loan and at a good interest rate for Lansdown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tunley Legend Posted September 19, 2005 Author Report Share Posted September 19, 2005 do our chairman and board pay to get into the gate or for away games, do they buy city shirts ect, do they buy a burger and tea at the match. they just bung some big amount of cash, in, when needed, and take it back out when its right for them. i can`t do that. but i`m still here and i`ll be there in years to come. will they ?←In fairness to Lansdown he must be City through and through or he would not have injected his big amount of cash in the first place. My main problem is that he (and the rest of the board) has a tendency to make kneejerk reactions such as appointing Tinnion without going through all available options and Lansdown himself seems to make crazy comments to the press such as his views on Saturday's game.He either really believes that was a good game in which case I would question his judgement on all matters football or he is trying to pull the wool over peoples eyes in which case he is assuming everyone has extremely low intelligence. At least 75% of football supporters know a decent game when they see one and Saturday was not it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mundz18 Posted September 19, 2005 Report Share Posted September 19, 2005 if he had to pay to watch that on sat, would he have said it was agood game, i don't think so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tunley Legend Posted September 19, 2005 Author Report Share Posted September 19, 2005 if he had to pay to watch that on sat, would he have said it was agood game, i don't think so.←Put it this way, Lansdown is the only person I have read, spoken to or heard who said that was a good game of football. As I was walking out there was a Blackpool supporter behind with his kid who was about 5. His son thought Blackpool deserved to win. His answer went along the lines of "Both sides deserved to lose but neither deserved to win". A strange comment but I know exactly what he meant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockin-robin Posted September 19, 2005 Report Share Posted September 19, 2005 if he had to pay to watch that on sat, would he have said it was agood game, i don't think so.←As someone who has known Steve Lansdown for over 10 years I can not believe how wrong some of you are. Steve is one of the most loyal City fans I have ever known and was a Season ticket (along with his son )holder many years before he ever decided to become chairman. With everything he says or does is truly done with Bristol City's best intentions at heart and if it wasn't for him the club would be 'financially' a lot worse off than it is now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tunley Legend Posted September 19, 2005 Author Report Share Posted September 19, 2005 As someone who has known Steve Lansdown for over 10 years I can not believe how wrong some of you are. Steve is one of the most loyal City fans I have ever known and was a Season ticket (along with his son )holder many years before he ever decided to become chairman. With everything he says or does is truly done with Bristol City's best intentions at heart and if it wasn't for him the club would be 'financially' a lot worse off than it is now.←Playing devils advocate here for a second, why did he make such a ridiculous comment about the quality of the game on Saturday? Is he trying to wind people up? Or did he believe, in the best interests of Bristol City, that he could fool people into thinking that was a proper game of football? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Robin Posted September 19, 2005 Report Share Posted September 19, 2005 I could not believe the comment that was attributed to our Chairman in today's Evening Post. Apparently the 90 minutes on offer Saturday represented "a good game of football".I agree that it was a small improvement on the previous fare we have endured under Tinnion and I have said this on other threads but to call that a good game defies all logic and belief. Yes, there were a couple of moments from Gillespie, Orr looked different gravy when he replaced Hoofer at Right Back and there were one or two moments from Blackpool but overall the game represented a very poor advert for professional football, even at Third Division level. For a continuous twenty minutes in the second half you could have went to sleep and not missed a single piece of worthwhile action.If Saturday is the benchmark by which Steve Lansdown judges a "good" game of football then, as supporters, we should all be very worried.←i have to agree it was dire saturday i nearly fell asleep Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LSN Posted September 19, 2005 Report Share Posted September 19, 2005 don't even get me started on Lansdown.....Everyone talks about what a great chairman he is but i disagree, I think he's a crap chairman who now only cares about trying to get some return on the money he has put into City.And before everyone tells me that without him the club would go bust i will say this......... One of the reasons we are in so much debt is because of his p1ss poor decisions.←I've said the same for some time now. Even my old man thinks the same, i think this is the only city related thing we have agreed on in years! Lansdown has made more wrong decisions than right ones. That just isn't good enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richieb Posted September 19, 2005 Report Share Posted September 19, 2005 Have to agree, I thought both sides were very poor & it was far from a good game of football.Lets hope the choice of manager dosn't reflect this !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerry Gows' Tash Posted September 19, 2005 Report Share Posted September 19, 2005 It wasn't a classic game of football by a long way, but for a team on the back of a caning and without a manger it wasn't bad, there were long dull periods but we did have more shots on target than we have for a while. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CITY BOY DAVE Posted September 19, 2005 Report Share Posted September 19, 2005 Well I've heard that SCOTT DAVIDSON is comming back.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Frank Posted September 19, 2005 Report Share Posted September 19, 2005 Well I've heard that SCOTT DAVIDSON is comming back....←Never go back. It's never the same 2nd time round. That's what I've been told anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richieb Posted September 19, 2005 Report Share Posted September 19, 2005 Well I've heard that SCOTT DAVIDSON is comming back....←Wouldn't that be something.Perhaps he is waiting til the right moment ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
westex red Posted September 19, 2005 Report Share Posted September 19, 2005 I go back every game, and its always the same! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Swindon Hater Posted September 19, 2005 Report Share Posted September 19, 2005 don't even get me started on Lansdown.....Everyone talks about what a great chairman he is but i disagree, I think he's a crap chairman who now only cares about trying to get some return on the money he has put into City.And before everyone tells me that without him the club would go bust i will say this......... One of the reasons we are in so much debt is because of his p1ss poor decisions.←Spot on that man! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.