glastonred Posted September 28, 2005 Report Share Posted September 28, 2005 I couldn't resist reminding people that it wasn't that long ago that the likes of Bradley Orr, Luke Wilkshire, and Craig Woodman were constantly being slagged off by contributors to this forum, and now they suddenly cannot put a foot wrong. Why is this? Perhaps it won't be long before everyone will be extolling the virtues of Clayton Fortune, and saying what a wonderful player they always thought he was! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex_BCFC Posted September 28, 2005 Report Share Posted September 28, 2005 I couldn't resist reminding people that it wasn't that long ago that the likes of Bradley Orr, Luke Wilkshire, and Craig Woodman were constantly being slagged off by contributors to this forum, and now they suddenly cannot put a foot wrong. Why is this? Because they are playing well?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cider head Posted September 28, 2005 Report Share Posted September 28, 2005 it really is as simple as start pulling your weight and start playing well and you get praiseorr has found a position he can be comfortable with, wilkshire was also playing out of position before.as for woodman and fortune i just don't rate them i belive we can bring in better thanthem 2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Ian M Posted September 29, 2005 Admin Report Share Posted September 29, 2005 I couldn't resist reminding people that it wasn't that long ago that the likes of Bradley Orr, Luke Wilkshire, and Craig Woodman were constantly being slagged off by contributors to this forum, and now they suddenly cannot put a foot wrong. Why is this? Perhaps it won't be long before everyone will be extolling the virtues of Clayton Fortune, and saying what a wonderful player they always thought he was!To be fair, those who are now praising previously maligned players aren't claiming to have always known they'd make it. They're pointing out that they are now playing above their previous levels and that this is good to see. Not exactly fickle but I see where you are coming from... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BeNeRz Posted September 29, 2005 Report Share Posted September 29, 2005 Yes, i didnt rate bradley orr at all.But i think the young lad has had a good couple of games and i hope he does well and proves what i thought before wronghessssssssssss an orrrrrrrrrrrrr Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lordofthebling Posted September 29, 2005 Report Share Posted September 29, 2005 I couldn't resist reminding people that it wasn't that long ago that the likes of Bradley Orr, Luke Wilkshire, and Craig Woodman were constantly being slagged off by contributors to this forum, and now they suddenly cannot put a foot wrong. Why is this? Perhaps it won't be long before everyone will be extolling the virtues of Clayton Fortune, and saying what a wonderful player they always thought he was!I have always liked Orrs workrate, but midfield is not his position.I was and still am not Wilkshires biggest fan. I feel he takes about 20 minutes to get into a game - and sometimes does not look bothered.Woodman - I still prefer Goldbourne on an individual basis, although he is playing ok as part of the back four.We all have opinions, I do apologise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex_BCFC Posted September 29, 2005 Report Share Posted September 29, 2005 I have always liked Orrs workrate, but midfield is not his position.I was and still am not Wilkshires biggest fan. I feel he takes about 20 minutes to get into a game - and sometimes does not look bothered.Woodman - I still prefer Goldbourne on an individual basis, although he is playing ok as part of the back four.We all have opinions, I do apologise.I'm not Wilshire's biggest fan BUT he is the only one in the team with any kind of creativity. He can also score sometimes. Woodman played well on Tuesday but since then hasn't been great. Orr's best postion has always been right back- can't believe the coaching staff have taken so long to realise this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redtucks Posted September 29, 2005 Report Share Posted September 29, 2005 Woodman played well on Tuesday but since then hasn't been great.What have you expected him to do since Tuesday???He hasn't had a chance to be great!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex_BCFC Posted September 29, 2005 Report Share Posted September 29, 2005 What have you expected him to do since Tuesday???He hasn't had a chance to be great!!!I meant 'before' then. good spot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mozo Posted September 29, 2005 Report Share Posted September 29, 2005 I meant 'before' then. good spot.I think you summed up the fickle City fan then: ' Tuesday he was good but by Wednesday I hated him...I'll give til thursday morning to redeem himself!' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex_BCFC Posted September 29, 2005 Report Share Posted September 29, 2005 I think you summed up the fickle City fan then: ' Tuesday he was good but by Wednesday I hated him...I'll give til thursday morning to redeem himself!'True, he shoud have done better on Wednesday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbored Posted September 29, 2005 Report Share Posted September 29, 2005 When things aren't going well the fans look for scapegoats and Woodman,Wilkshire and Orr have taken the most OTT stick.Now things are more rosy - all the players are suddenly superstars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gaz897 Posted September 29, 2005 Report Share Posted September 29, 2005 Play badly people critisise, Play well, hence Orr at right back and Wilks putting in good performances then you get praise. Woodman is still poor though in my OPINION! Golbourne for LB. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.