Guest city4mylife Posted October 21, 2005 Report Share Posted October 21, 2005 i'd say 2 i'd say marcus stewart and michael bridges. what do you lot think Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stfc_dave Posted October 21, 2005 Report Share Posted October 21, 2005 I'd say you're a plank. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest city4mylife Posted October 21, 2005 Report Share Posted October 21, 2005 ha ha ha very funny not Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich-TWSC- Posted October 21, 2005 Report Share Posted October 21, 2005 I'd say you're a plank.Now, now David. Calm down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cideriuplandlord Posted October 21, 2005 Report Share Posted October 21, 2005 Come on cty4mylife, I tried to stick up for you the other day on here when others were taking the Micheal but you really are going to have to sort out your posts. Please tell us you wrote that as a wind up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chivs Posted October 21, 2005 Report Share Posted October 21, 2005 i'd say 2 i'd say marcus stewart and michael bridges. what do you lot thinkYou can't have 2 people as the "best". "Best" implies better than all the rest. Clearly 2 players cannot be better than all the rest.You could combine them into a set, the set containing the members Stewart and Bridges, and claim that that set was the best. You might be on difficult set theory here though as I'm not sure that a set containing Beckham, Ronaldo and Carlos, could anyway be compared to the set containing Bridges and Stewart. You have to define your comparison criteria. Any set experts out there?Anyway, it's Fortune. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dolman_bcfc Posted October 21, 2005 Report Share Posted October 21, 2005 i'd say 2 i'd say marcus stewart and michael bridges. what do you lot think :Sleep12: ..... SCOTT BROWN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CiderHider Posted October 21, 2005 Report Share Posted October 21, 2005 It depends i guess..Best player form: Steve Phillips.Best player current value: Steve BrookerBest player potential value: Dave Cotterill / Cole SkuseBest player potential value to the team: Scott GoldbourneThere, all bases covered Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
havanatopia Posted October 21, 2005 Report Share Posted October 21, 2005 You can't have 2 people as the "best". "Best" implies better than all the rest. Clearly 2 players cannot be better than all the rest.You could combine them into a set, the set containing the members Stewart and Bridges, and claim that that set was the best. You might be on difficult set theory here though as I'm not sure that a set containing Beckham, Ronaldo and Carlos, could anyway be compared to the set containing Bridges and Stewart. You have to define your comparison criteria. Any set experts out there?Anyway, it's Fortune. we have been so poor for so much of the early part of the season i am having difficulty answering this one and quite frankly i do not think anyone deserves the accolade just yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Codfather 0312 Posted October 21, 2005 Report Share Posted October 21, 2005 Steve phillips. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest paulton rovers red Posted October 21, 2005 Report Share Posted October 21, 2005 ALAN WALSH! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex_BCFC Posted October 21, 2005 Report Share Posted October 21, 2005 ALAN WALSH!Steve Brooker. First name of the team sheet if fit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
054123 Posted October 21, 2005 Report Share Posted October 21, 2005 I'd say you're a plank.What's all that about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lordofthebling Posted October 21, 2005 Report Share Posted October 21, 2005 I'd say you're a plank.This is what its all about! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete1975Legend Posted October 21, 2005 Report Share Posted October 21, 2005 Luke Wilkshire followed very closely by phillips Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
054123 Posted October 21, 2005 Report Share Posted October 21, 2005 This is what its all about!Sorry to be dumb, but i still don't get it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alex_BCFC Posted October 21, 2005 Report Share Posted October 21, 2005 Sorry to be dumb, but i still don't get it.I think a lot of people are fed up with his posts for being pointless/stupid. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest captain Posted October 21, 2005 Report Share Posted October 21, 2005 Luke Wilkshire followed very closely by phillipsI think that they are two of our best players and am glad Wilkshires finally getting to play in his best position. Philips is the best shot stopper in the league but he has to work on his ability to deal with crosses and take more command of his area because I think that lack of communication has a key influence on some of our lapse defending. The last few seasons we have conceded the majority of our goals from set pieces but hopefully with the added height in there, especially when Heywood gets back, we should sort that out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Cloud Posted October 21, 2005 Report Share Posted October 21, 2005 without a doubt brooker! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Mosquito Posted October 21, 2005 Report Share Posted October 21, 2005 i'd say 2 i'd say marcus stewart and michael bridges. what do you lot thinkMarcus Stewart has been nothing more than mediocre and Michael Bridges has been nothing more than poor so far at Bristol City FC.The most consistantly decent players over the past years have been Phillips and Wilkshire by far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted October 21, 2005 Report Share Posted October 21, 2005 i'd say 2 i'd say marcus stewart and michael bridges. what do you lot think I`d say they are 2 of the worse, most highly paid and they can both go tomorrow Despite his small weaknesses Philips seems 100% City and will be here for a while; Heywood and Brooker would be the 2 I would miss most, which means they will probably be both sold off inthe summer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richy P Posted October 21, 2005 Report Share Posted October 21, 2005 Form: Scott Brown, Steve BrookerBest Overall: Luke Wilkshire Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sheptongas Posted October 21, 2005 Report Share Posted October 21, 2005 Kevin Mabbutt still play? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southy354 Posted October 21, 2005 Report Share Posted October 21, 2005 It depends i guess..Best player form: Steve Phillips.Best player current value: Steve BrookerBest player potential value: Dave Cotterill / Cole SkuseBest player potential value to the team: Scott GoldbourneThere, all bases covered I think that is right but have wilkshire in there aswell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dolman_bcfc Posted October 21, 2005 Report Share Posted October 21, 2005 James Quinn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxidriver999 Posted October 21, 2005 Report Share Posted October 21, 2005 Marcus Stewart has had plenty of opportunity to show us that he is the best City player but has fallen short by a long way.Michael Bridges has not been given the opportunity as yet to prove himself & with the arrival of Quinn seems unlikely to do so.I am fed up of reading negative posts on Bridges, who clearly has a lot of talent but if not selected to play cannot show us what he can achieve, 15 mins as a sub every game is nothing to go on.The best player so far is Luke Wiltshire. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myoudale Posted October 21, 2005 Report Share Posted October 21, 2005 Wilkshire without a doubt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bristolface Posted October 21, 2005 Report Share Posted October 21, 2005 i'd say 2 i'd say marcus stewart and michael bridges. what do you lot thinkLouis Carey ha ha ha I so don't mean that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jay Posted October 21, 2005 Report Share Posted October 21, 2005 I think a lot of people are fed up with his posts for being pointless/stupid.Is he related to Legend City Man / citycityman ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest city4mylife Posted October 21, 2005 Report Share Posted October 21, 2005 alright guys calm down. lets say who is your fav player? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.