Robbored Posted March 19, 2004 Report Share Posted March 19, 2004 I'm not convinced that Wilson is serious about getting a loan player.To do so would badly effect the morale of those players whose place could be under threat. My guess is that he's publically saying that he's looking to get someone in with the real intention being to keep the current players guessing and therefore on their toes and eager to impress. You could call it man-management.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bucksred Posted March 19, 2004 Report Share Posted March 19, 2004 or waking up to the possibilities of it going Pete Tong, and chucking away a seasons hard work Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcfc seattle Posted March 19, 2004 Report Share Posted March 19, 2004 outside of Robins last year he hasn't had very good luck (?) or good player selection on loans. Fagan, various GK's ,Singh, etc. etc. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andy g Posted March 19, 2004 Report Share Posted March 19, 2004 Or maybe he really doesn't know himself... To be honest I've given up trying to read his mind now - it just gives me a headache. I just hope he accidentally signs an experienced player who knows where the goal is and who somehow manages gets us promotion. My moneys on another Craig Fagan though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbored Posted March 19, 2004 Author Report Share Posted March 19, 2004 Pete Tong??? Am I missing something... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Ian M Posted March 19, 2004 Admin Report Share Posted March 19, 2004 Pete Tong??? Am I missing something... "It's all going Pete Tong.....Wrong" My fear is that we heard all this stuff about getting an experienced man in last season immediately before the arrival of....Craig Fagan If it's actually an inexperienced kid from a higher club or going with what we already have I'd rather we signed no-one, unless they really are a "hot prospect" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dorset_Cider Posted March 19, 2004 Report Share Posted March 19, 2004 Does he know what that means? Which bit Tom........ man or management Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobby Posted March 19, 2004 Report Share Posted March 19, 2004 Does he know what that means? harsh - when did you get so negative and cynical? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Ian M Posted March 19, 2004 Admin Report Share Posted March 19, 2004 harsh - when did you get so negative and cynical? I would hazard a guess of "during the last 4 years" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest H Block Drum n' Bass Posted March 19, 2004 Report Share Posted March 19, 2004 Well if he is or if its just man-managments if it works i have no-complaints!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedM Posted March 19, 2004 Report Share Posted March 19, 2004 It's just mind games , telling the players to up a gear or you could be replaced by a loanee. Without actually telling them. I think we have spent all we are going to spend this season, so no more going on extra wages, even though we have off loaded a few players. I think we will stick with what we have got for now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobby Posted March 19, 2004 Report Share Posted March 19, 2004 It's just mind games , telling the players to up a gear or you could be replaced by a loanee. Without actually telling them. I think we have spent all we are going to spend this season, so no more going on extra wages, even though we have off loaded a few players. I think we will stick with what we have got for now. Mybe maybe not, think there is room in the wage bill for one more - we have off loaded some already and are back to a pretty small squad at the moment. If the right player were available I think we would go for it - but never quite that easy is it??? still I reckon we can do ok with what we have Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbored Posted March 20, 2004 Author Report Share Posted March 20, 2004 On "Planet Wilson" as you put it - all thats seen is that Peacock is the mutts nuts as far as Wilson is concerned. Wilson rates "Golden Boy" above all the other players and can see no further than LP's name as first on the team sheet. All the cries for a Miller/Lita start will fall on deaf ears.It simply won't happen. So...get over it!.......... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
budbcfc Posted March 20, 2004 Report Share Posted March 20, 2004 if your quite happy where we are then you must like 2nd div football a lot. as long as he plays peacock we wont get the goals we need for promotion. FACT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Ian M Posted March 20, 2004 Admin Report Share Posted March 20, 2004 Here I am in Happy clappy land on Planet Wilson then , quite happy with things as they are at the moment Would you put much money on L.P not scoring in any game, no dont think so, he will be favourite to score in any game he plays in. Depends what the odds are. Peacock's played in 38 games, scoring in 12 of them this season. That makes 12 losing bets, 26 winning bets. Anything such as 1/2 or longer would show me in a profit for the season so I guess it's be "yeah, I would". Edit: (odds: score 1st, score last, score anytime) Lee Miller 5.00 5.00 2.10 Marc Goodfellow 5.50 5.50 2.25 Lee Peacock 5.50 5.50 2.25 Ooh, Miller's favourite with Bristol City's very own betting service Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bucksred Posted March 20, 2004 Report Share Posted March 20, 2004 Here I am in Happy clappy land on Planet Wilson then , quite happy with things as they are at the moment Would you put much money on L.P not scoring in any game, no dont think so, he will be favourite to score in any game he plays in. You'll lose yer money(Personally I wouldnt even waste breath, or money on him), then, another productive day for Leapy, finally subbed, in his 10th game without scoring. Trouble is its got so bad no-one is scoring now!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cider red Posted March 20, 2004 Report Share Posted March 20, 2004 He better not be bluffing after todays performance becuase it hasnt worked and we so badly need a goalscorer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobby Posted March 20, 2004 Report Share Posted March 20, 2004 Pathetic display by all.11 players now required yeh, Danny thinks so too Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bucksred Posted March 20, 2004 Report Share Posted March 20, 2004 yeh, Danny thinks so too ##** me, they are almost all his ######* signings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobby Posted March 20, 2004 Report Share Posted March 20, 2004 ##** me, they are almost all his ######* signings. and there was me thinking the likes of Phillips, Coles, Carey, Hill, Burnell, Tinnion..... were all around before he got here????? And Bell and Lita..... so that leaves, Butler - yes not good this season, but saved us a few times last season Wilkshire - played ok, but taken off Peacock - rubbish, injured, taken off Miller - played ok, better than most Goodfellow - showed promise but still too lightweight Roberts - the usual really Hmmmm, so all Danny's signings I think not! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Admin Ian M Posted March 21, 2004 Admin Report Share Posted March 21, 2004 and there was me thinking the likes of Phillips, Coles, Carey, Hill, Burnell, Tinnion..... were all around before he got here????? And Bell and Lita..... so that leaves, Butler - yes not good this season, but saved us a few times last season Wilkshire - played ok, but taken off Peacock - rubbish, injured, taken off Miller - played ok, better than most Goodfellow - showed promise but still too lightweight Roberts - the usual really Hmmmm, so all Danny's signings I think not! They were ALL offered contracts whilst Danny has been at the Club. Do you really think they'd have got contracts if Danny didn't want them? Therefore they ARE all his signings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.