pdgifford64 Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 YYYYYYYYYYYYEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSNice one......JevoCome on CITY. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NEWTONRED66 Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 Great Substitution from GJ. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Enormous Turnip Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 Agreed, but why did Andrews have to go off? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fat Controller Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 Agreed, but why did Andrews have to go off?So Jevons could come on.I don't think you're allowed 12 men on the pitch. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 Agreed, but why did Andrews have to go off?Tactical sub according to sporting life text "one Gary Johnson" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Enormous Turnip Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 So Jevons could come on.I don't think you're allowed 12 men on the pitch. well spotted there i mean what was wrong with him, or was it just a very early tactical sub? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
beau45 Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 well spotted there i mean what was wrong with him, or was it just a very early tactical sub?Think it must have been tatical, they said on the radio that he didnt look too happy when he came off Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 well spotted there i mean what was wrong with him, or was it just a very early tactical sub? SEE POST 64 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Enormous Turnip Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 SEE POST 64 you wrote that while i was writing, cheat brighton have brought on a striker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fat Controller Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 well spotted there i mean what was wrong with him, or was it just a very early tactical sub?I guess it was tactical.If Andrews wasnt getting in behind Brighton or was just inneffective, then it made sense to sub him.It worked anyway, i guess we'll find out afterwards eh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 you wrote that while i was writing, cheat brighton have brought on a strikerWe did it first, trying to "match" us :coat: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 I guess it was tactical.If Andrews wasnt getting in behind Brighton or was just inneffective, then it made sense to sub him.It worked anyway, i guess we'll find out afterwards eh. see post 64 & 67 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fat Controller Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 see post 64 & 67 I read your post, and expanded on your comment. Whats the problem.See POST 69 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lordofthebling Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 Christ, I hope it all stays like this - we go up to 3rd - 1 point behind 2nd placed Forest witha game in hand! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocky Posted February 24, 2007 Author Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 Bloody hell, only 6000 there Well done 400 odd City fans Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS10 RED Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 scunny 1-1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocky Posted February 24, 2007 Author Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 Come on the Gills1-1 with ScunnyMS just scored for Yeovil Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 Scunny 1 - 1 GillinghamYeovil 1 - 0 Swansea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS10 RED Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 stewart just scored for yeovil so there 1nil up against swansea Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS10 RED Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 as it stands were in 4th on 59pts forest in 3rd on 60pts yeovil in 2nd on 60pts and scunny top on 65pts but we do have a game in hand Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Enormous Turnip Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 as it stands were in 4th on 59pts forest in 3rd on 60pts yeovil in 2nd on 60pts and scunny top on 65pts but we do have a game in handdo we have a game in hand on forest or yeovil? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ecko Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 do we have a game in hand on forest or yeovil?Yes, we have a game in hand with every team in the top 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cidercity1987 Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 do we have a game in hand on forest or yeovil?Both. http://www.sportinglife.com/football/live/...cc_league1.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lordofthebling Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 Game in hand on the top 5, with two games in hand over Tranny currently in 6th. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS10 RED Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 scunny back in front who thinks there to far in front to catch up? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ecko Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 scunny back in front who thinks there to far in front to catch up?Nope, bound to have a blip soon.Just look at Forest for an example Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Enormous Turnip Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 scunny back in front who thinks there to far in front to catch up?Not me.. we can definately catch them.If we win our game in hand then we only need them to slip up in a couple of games and were level.I do reckon they will go up though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
formerly known as ivan Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 scunny back in front who thinks there to far in front to catch up?catching them isnt a concern of ours. first get into to 2nd andt then take ir from there.scunny are looking good at the moment though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
formerly known as ivan Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 smith on for brooker.good luck to him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brizzlered1 Posted February 24, 2007 Report Share Posted February 24, 2007 On an extra positive note - no bookings as of yet which is great news - especailly with the end of Feb soon where all of the bookings are returned to zero. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.