Pickle Rick Posted October 13, 2007 Report Share Posted October 13, 2007 Just shows we have ambition, this is the sort of signing we should be going for.A past-it player who struggles to move, let alone run or jump for the ball nowadays. If we had this ambition we'd be in their place.Ok its Friday and I am tired.I meant it shows that we have no ambition.Tired = very dumb then I see Please, this signing wouldn't be worthy of 90% of clubs in this league! People are thinking of his past reputation rather than his current ability. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bcityfan11 Posted October 13, 2007 Report Share Posted October 13, 2007 how old is he? 34 my guess? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chappers Posted October 14, 2007 Report Share Posted October 14, 2007 Personally, I think it could be a good signing for Norwich in the short-term. Hartson was a decent player, and whilst he is past his best, he can still do a job at Championship level. Norwich have had a poor start, but do have a lot of decent players, and with a change of Manager, a new face, and a target man to work off, players like Huckerby and Cureton might finally start scoring. In Citys case, we are doing well, play a system that is not suited to a Hartson type player, so he would not be right for us. Horses for courses and all that, and we'll see if he is any good next week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
no1cityfan_tucks Posted October 14, 2007 Report Share Posted October 14, 2007 We've already got a slow, old, fat, lazy striker, thank you.I thought u were refering to Steve Brooker to be honest. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bristolcityup Posted October 15, 2007 Report Share Posted October 15, 2007 http://www.eveningnews24.co.uk/content/Spo...3A16%3A35%3A740 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.