bartolona Posted April 2, 2008 Report Share Posted April 2, 2008 Anyone watching link Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmersonsKev Posted April 2, 2008 Report Share Posted April 2, 2008 Cheers mate, now watching was unaware this existed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dollymarie Posted April 2, 2008 Report Share Posted April 2, 2008 Someone keep us posted on the result. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS3_RED Posted April 2, 2008 Report Share Posted April 2, 2008 These nimbys are great. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bartolona Posted April 2, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 2, 2008 looks like Carl Saunders sat in the background. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS3_RED Posted April 2, 2008 Report Share Posted April 2, 2008 looks like Carl Saunders sat in the background. I know the bloke thats speaking now from somewhere. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cidersam Posted April 2, 2008 Report Share Posted April 2, 2008 Its quite funny hearing some of the reasons why people oppose to it. Not sounding good for the sags though so far, theres so many faults with the plans Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS3_RED Posted April 2, 2008 Report Share Posted April 2, 2008 looks like Carl Saunders sat in the background. It is, he is speaking now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest zider_head Posted April 2, 2008 Report Share Posted April 2, 2008 Nice to see Carl Saunders bothered dressing up for it jesus looks like he is off painting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
garlicbread Posted April 2, 2008 Report Share Posted April 2, 2008 It is, he is speaking now. Blimey, he's lost weight! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bartolona Posted April 2, 2008 Author Report Share Posted April 2, 2008 They're going to host the Olympics now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Man In Black Posted April 2, 2008 Report Share Posted April 2, 2008 Lets be honest, a lot of the objections are just typical NIMBY-esque responses, just nit-picking at the scheme, e.g. "in the revised plans the shop door will move six metres closer to residential houses" I can't see it being turned down, and if it is I'll be amazed at the short-sightedness of the council. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS3_RED Posted April 2, 2008 Report Share Posted April 2, 2008 Lets be honest, a lot of the objections are just typical NIMBY-esque responses, just nit-picking at the scheme, e.g. "in the revised plans the shop door will move six metres closer to residential houses" I can't see it being turned down, and if it is I'll be amazed at the short-sightedness of the council. I agree. There is no chance in hell that this will be turned down and even if it is, they still have the original planning application. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob k Posted April 2, 2008 Report Share Posted April 2, 2008 I agree. There is no chance in hell that this will be turned down and even if it is, they still have the original planning application. It wont get built anway so i suppose it does not matter if it gets planning or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stoke_Gifford_Red Posted April 2, 2008 Report Share Posted April 2, 2008 Lets be honest, a lot of the objections are just typical NIMBY-esque responses, just nit-picking at the scheme, e.g. "in the revised plans the shop door will move six metres closer to residential houses" I can't see it being turned down, and if it is I'll be amazed at the short-sightedness of the council. From my knowledge of energy projects some of the objections recieved are that minor, if not more so and it has been known for projects to be refused because of the compound effect of so many little objections. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DanC Posted April 2, 2008 Report Share Posted April 2, 2008 I agree. There is no chance in hell that this will be turned down and even if it is, they still have the original planning application.But they can't afford to build the original application. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest MaloneFM Posted April 2, 2008 Report Share Posted April 2, 2008 Look out for a councellor Martin Carey. He is a postman in the Mead and claimed he was working late last time he had to vote and couldn't go. He's a postman for christ's sake. They NEVER work past 2:00 in the afternoon. That WAS Billy Ocean (Saunders). Some one with a pink tie is now banging on about them being a 'family club'. Most of the family seem to go in the Cabot on saturdays. And thats why its shut. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrahamC Posted April 2, 2008 Report Share Posted April 2, 2008 Look out for a councellor Martin Carey. He is a postman in the Mead and claimed he was working late last time he had to vote and couldn't go. He's a postman for christ's sake. They NEVER work past 2:00 in the afternoon. That WAS Billy Ocean (Saunders). Some one with a pink tie is now banging on about them being a 'family club'. Most of the family seem to go in the Cabot on saturdays. And thats why its shut. Mr. Carey surely has a conflict of interests then, surname like that but Meaders votes to get. What family is it? Addams? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest MaloneFM Posted April 2, 2008 Report Share Posted April 2, 2008 Didn't think of that one Sippers! Speaking now is a Chris Atyeo to be followed by a Paul Lansdown. Probably. Hang on...18 THOUSAND seats? Are there that many part timers in north Bristol? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slartibartfast Posted April 2, 2008 Report Share Posted April 2, 2008 Look out for a councellor Martin Carey. He is a postman in the Mead and claimed he was working late last time he had to vote and couldn't go. He's a postman for christ's sake. They NEVER work past 2:00 in the afternoon. That WAS Billy Ocean (Saunders). Some one with a pink tie is now banging on about them being a 'family club'. Most of the family seem to go in the Cabot on saturdays. And thats why its shut. The Tw** has cited four things that does the community good, fair enough, BUT that has NOTHING to do with building a ground, these things go on now! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest MaloneFM Posted April 2, 2008 Report Share Posted April 2, 2008 The Tw** has cited four things that does the community good, fair enough, BUT that has NOTHING to do with building a ground, these things go on now! How many of these buggers live in BS7 anyway? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest MaloneFM Posted April 2, 2008 Report Share Posted April 2, 2008 Spud Murphy for mayor! The chairman is biased. 'If we vote no it may go to court and the poll tax will rise to pay for the lwyers, I don't know which way I will vote'. Really? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
devonrobin Posted April 2, 2008 Report Share Posted April 2, 2008 How many of these buggers live in BS7 anyway? colin smith is a red and hes voting for trator burn him Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcbcfc Posted April 2, 2008 Report Share Posted April 2, 2008 Interesting about the talk of promoting football for the whole city with room for "two vibrant football clubs and stadiums" sounds good for our future stadium application. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Man In Black Posted April 2, 2008 Report Share Posted April 2, 2008 But they can't afford to build the original application. Which is a completely separate issue to a planning application. Lets be honest, is there any REAL reason not to approve the plans apart from the fact that: a) they were submitted by Bristol Rovers b) the likelihood of it ever getting built is slight Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest MaloneFM Posted April 2, 2008 Report Share Posted April 2, 2008 If they vote for the gas will have to play their games at Cheltenham Swindle Yeovile Trumpton Forest Green the Downs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest MaloneFM Posted April 2, 2008 Report Share Posted April 2, 2008 Which is a completely separate issue to a planning application. Lets be honest, is there any REAL reason not to approve the plans apart from the fact that: a) they were submitted by Bristol Rovers b) the likelihood of it ever getting built is slight c)traffic nightmare d) students Spud Murphy just said we have got one and seven eights good teams in Bristol. SPUD FOR POPE! He also said that City are going to the Premier League and the gas are going the other way! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcbcfc Posted April 2, 2008 Report Share Posted April 2, 2008 Spud Murphy for mayor! Hear hear "We need two good teams in Bristol, well we've got one and 7/8" Damn your quick Malone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest MaloneFM Posted April 2, 2008 Report Share Posted April 2, 2008 Damn your quick Malone Mrs M tells me that. Not good is it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nibor Posted April 2, 2008 Report Share Posted April 2, 2008 Approved 7-2. Great news for us, it gives them less room to refuse our future application and it means there's a reasonable chance Rovers will move out of Bristol and be unable to afford to finish the development that allows them to come back. Now begins the frantic hunt down the back of the couch for £30m, good luck with that Dunceford. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.