Septic Peg Posted October 10, 2017 Report Share Posted October 10, 2017 Who's OOC this summer? Obv one is Gaz O'Neil. We know both Flinty and Pack are on long contracts and relative newbies such as Taylor, Fam, Đurić etc should be ok too. But what lengths are left for everyone else? Should we be tying down Bobby or Joe? Did COD, Browny or Patto sign two years only? Mildly concerned that if we don't start tying some down where needed, we'll be in the shit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spoons Posted October 10, 2017 Report Share Posted October 10, 2017 I think the club know what they are doing! Calm down dear ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS4 on Tour... Posted October 10, 2017 Report Share Posted October 10, 2017 36 minutes ago, Septic Peg said: Who's OOC this summer? Obv one is Gaz O'Neil. We know both Flinty and Pack are on long contracts and relative newbies such as Taylor, Fam, Đurić etc should be ok too. But what lengths are left for everyone else? Should we be tying down Bobby or Joe? Did COD, Browny or Patto sign two years only? Mildly concerned that if we don't start tying some down where needed, we'll be in the shit. As far as I know the following are OOC in the summer of 2018, in addition to Gary O'Neil... Bobby Reid - but an option of a further year has been built in Marlon Pack - but an option of a further year has been built in Luke Steele - but an option of a further year has been built in Josh Brownhill Frank Fielding Ivan Lucic Zak Vyner Max O'Leary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WRERE Posted October 10, 2017 Report Share Posted October 10, 2017 O'Leary also has an option for another year, and Golbourne is also out of contract this summer. The one that's troubling me the most is Brownhill. Iirc Stockhausen said we were in contract talks with him over the summer when there was speculation about him joining a prem team and we haven't heard anything since. Really hope we tie him down for long term. I think they should all get new deals apart from Golbourne. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmersonsRed Posted October 10, 2017 Report Share Posted October 10, 2017 Joe has all but signed a new deal anyway Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JasonM88 Posted October 10, 2017 Report Share Posted October 10, 2017 Johnson said earlier this season that Brownhill has more than a year left, despite general belief. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Major Isewater Posted October 11, 2017 Report Share Posted October 11, 2017 8 hours ago, EmersonsRed said: Joe has all but signed a new deal anyway That's a bit like being ' all but pregnant ' , you either are or you're not . He's either signed or he hasn't. Whatever his motivation is right now until the contract is signed it doesn't mean diddly squat . I trust the club these days to get it right more often than not . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EmersonsRed Posted October 11, 2017 Report Share Posted October 11, 2017 8 hours ago, Major Isewater said: That's a bit like being ' all but pregnant ' , you either are or you're not . He's either signed or he hasn't. Whatever his motivation is right now until the contract is signed it doesn't mean diddly squat . I trust the club these days to get it right more often than not . Can't sign a contract you haven't been offered. Can verbally agree to sign one when it's offered at the end of the season though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbored Posted October 11, 2017 Report Share Posted October 11, 2017 17 hours ago, WRERE said: Golbourne is also out of contract this summer. Really hope we tie him down The fact that Golbourne is out on loan suggests that he's not in LJs plans. I'm sure Scott is aware of that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lrrr Posted October 11, 2017 Report Share Posted October 11, 2017 13 hours ago, JasonM88 said: Johnson said earlier this season that Brownhill has more than a year left, despite general belief. Is that with the option? So technically does expire this summer just if we haven't applied the extension yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hoxton casual Posted October 11, 2017 Report Share Posted October 11, 2017 18 hours ago, Spoons said: I think the club know what they are doing! Calm down dear ! Well if we didnt second guess the club, it would be a pretty sparse noticeboard! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Major Isewater Posted October 11, 2017 Report Share Posted October 11, 2017 33 minutes ago, EmersonsRed said: Can't sign a contract you haven't been offered. Can verbally agree to sign one when it's offered at the end of the season though. As they say a verbal agreement is not worth the paper it's written on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
View from the Dolman Posted October 11, 2017 Report Share Posted October 11, 2017 31 minutes ago, Robbored said: The fact that Golbourne is out on loan suggests that he's not in LJs plans. I'm sure Scott is aware of that. The poster had moved on to talking about Josh Brownhill by that second comment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bristolcitysweden Posted October 11, 2017 Report Share Posted October 11, 2017 19 hours ago, Spoons said: I think the club know what they are doing! Calm down dear ! As things stand I'll accept your comment for the time being. My issue is that to many players are on to long contracts costing us a fortune. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
One Team In Keynsham Posted October 11, 2017 Report Share Posted October 11, 2017 19 hours ago, Septic Peg said: Who's OOC this summer? Obv one is Gaz O'Neil. We know both Flinty and Pack are on long contracts and relative newbies such as Taylor, Fam, Đurić etc should be ok too. But what lengths are left for everyone else? Should we be tying down Bobby or Joe? Did COD, Browny or Patto sign two years only? Mildly concerned that if we don't start tying some down where needed, we'll be in the shit. Give them all 10 years. What could possibly go wrong? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Major Isewater Posted October 11, 2017 Report Share Posted October 11, 2017 4 minutes ago, One Team In Keynsham said: Give them all 10 years. What could possibly go wrong? Don't even joke about it . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbored Posted October 11, 2017 Report Share Posted October 11, 2017 16 minutes ago, View from the Dolman said: The poster had moved on to talking about Josh Brownhill by that second comment. and your point is?. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
22A Posted October 11, 2017 Report Share Posted October 11, 2017 14 hours ago, JasonM88 said: Johnson said earlier this season that Brownhill has more than a year left, despite general belief. You mean to say the Manager knows more about the club than certain Forum Members (claim to) do? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexukhc Posted October 11, 2017 Report Share Posted October 11, 2017 Reading seem to be handing out 4-5 year contracts to players Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
View from the Dolman Posted October 11, 2017 Report Share Posted October 11, 2017 24 minutes ago, Robbored said: and your point is?. My point is that you misleadingly quoted @WRERE's post to make it look like it said Golbourne should be "tied down". It did not say that. You then appeared to respond to that suggestion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phileas Fogg Posted October 11, 2017 Report Share Posted October 11, 2017 4 minutes ago, View from the Dolman said: My point is that you misleadingly quoted @WRERE's post to make it look like it said Golbourne should be "tied down". It did not say that. You then appeared to respond to that suggestion. What an odd thing to do - trying to fathom why you would do that @Robbored? A senior moment? If not.. why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbored Posted October 11, 2017 Report Share Posted October 11, 2017 22 minutes ago, View from the Dolman said: My point is that you misleadingly quoted @WRERE's post to make it look like it said Golbourne should be "tied down". It did not say that. You then appeared to respond to that suggestion. You're imagining stuff that's not there VD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
View from the Dolman Posted October 11, 2017 Report Share Posted October 11, 2017 9 minutes ago, Robbored said: You're imagining stuff that's not there VD. Um no. @Robbored, I'm really not. You are misleadingly quoting the original posting by @WRERE. Check @WRERE's post: 19 hours ago, WRERE said: O'Leary also has an option for another year, and Golbourne is also out of contract this summer. The one that's troubling me the most is Brownhill. Iirc Stockhausen said we were in contract talks with him over the summer when there was speculation about him joining a prem team and we haven't heard anything since. Really hope we tie him down for long term. I think they should all get new deals apart from Golbourne. Then you, @Robbored, quoted parts of it such that it read as: 19 hours ago, WRERE said: Golbourne is also out of contract this summer. Really hope we tie him down You, @Robbored, actively chose to remove something from the start of @WRERE's quote, a bit in the middle and a bit at the end. Since you're in denial, @Robbored, and struggle to accept you are wrong, I helpfully highlight in bold the parts of @WRERE's quote you quoted. 19 hours ago, WRERE said: O'Leary also has an option for another year, and Golbourne is also out of contract this summer. The one that's troubling me the most is Brownhill. Iirc Stockhausen said we were in contract talks with him over the summer when there was speculation about him joining a prem team and we haven't heard anything since. Really hope we tie him down for long term. I think they should all get new deals apart from Golbourne. That is somewhat odd behaviour. You, @Robbored, then appeared to dismiss such a possibility of Scott Golbourne being "tied down" despite the last few words of @WRERE's actual posting. Hence, @Robbored, I think you will find that my imagination was not involved in any part. You misleadingly quoted a poster and have lied upon being called out on it. That reflects more on you than it does me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phileas Fogg Posted October 11, 2017 Report Share Posted October 11, 2017 19 hours ago, WRERE said: O'Leary also has an option for another year, and Golbourne is also out of contract this summer. The one that's troubling me the most is Brownhill. Iirc Stockhausen said we were in contract talks with him over the summer when there was speculation about him joining a prem team and we haven't heard anything since. Really hope we tie him down for long term. I think they should all get new deals apart from Golbourne. Quote Golbourne is also out of contract this summer. Really hope we tie him down The original quote is above - you replied to it BUT you doctored it to make it read the second quote below. I've put in bold the parts you chose to reply to (which are totally unrelated) so you can see how you've destroyed the full context and made up a point to reply to at random. Did you just get it wrong? Or what? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbored Posted October 11, 2017 Report Share Posted October 11, 2017 5 minutes ago, View from the Dolman said: Check @WRERE's post: Hence, @Robbored, I think you will find that my imagination was not involved in any part. You misleadingly quoted a poster and have lied upon being called out on it. That reflects more on you than it does me. I'll hold my hands up here.... I just checked the post I question and I actually "doctored" it incorrectly. I've only just realised that. You were right to highlight my error. The point I was making still stands tho. With SG allowed to go out on loan strongly suggests that he's not it LJs plans this or any future seasons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phileas Fogg Posted October 11, 2017 Report Share Posted October 11, 2017 1 minute ago, Robbored said: I'll hold my hands up here.... I just checked the post I question and I actually "doctored" it incorrectly. I've only just realised that. You were right to highlight my error. The point I was making still stands tho. With SG allowed to go out on loan strongly suggests that he's not it LJs plans this or any future seasons. Everyone was fully aware of that though I think.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bobbie Posted October 11, 2017 Report Share Posted October 11, 2017 3 minutes of my life I’m never getting back... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbored Posted October 11, 2017 Report Share Posted October 11, 2017 15 minutes ago, Phileas Fogg said: Everyone was fully aware of that though I think.. You'd have thought so but this is otib.........it's easy enough to overestimate the posters savvy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.