TBW

My dad knew him and would always say hello in the late-90s and 2000s. Never knew how he knew him but always seemed to have a nice catch-up. My dad passed about seven years ago now. Losing all the faces I knew from the ground as a kid.

I'm not disregarding them, I'm saying they two surveys shouldn't be mixed together like they are. Most fans of this club don't particularly care about how the women's team do. You can tell this simply by looking at attendances. We grew up supporting the main Bristol City team, we've been with them through thick and thin. The women's team... we can't be expected to just have a passion for them out of nowhere just because they're associated. Typically, radio button survey enforce you to select an answer, it's just what you get used to over years and because of this people will select something to bypass the women's sections of the survey, not realising they could've left it blank. By doing so they are negatively effecting the results - If they select something, they effect it negatively... If they leave it blank, the people viewing the results don't know if it's because the person filling the survey doesn't care or genuinely just isn't sure of a response. The best way to get distinct results is to separate the surveys. Sure, add the women's one on the end, have it say "WOULD YOU HAVE FIVE MORE MINUTES TO ANSWER MORE QUESTIONS ABOUT BCFC WOMEN?" and let it go through to it. If people say no, they don't give a shit and won't negatively effect the results. It's as simple as that. Having a mish-mash back-and-forth between the two clubs in the survey is a mess, it's confusing and gets you out of thinking deeply about one subject. The two clubs are not one subject... if they were, the questions wouldn't need to be asked twice in the first place.

Whenever ANYONE ends something that isn't a TED talk with that line, they only make themselves look like a pedantic knobhead. Well done.

Another is to make a survey as simple and intuitive to the MAJORITY as possible. And the majority do not give a ****.

Most don't read paragraphs before a survey either. It's a multiple choice opinion survey. It shouldn't need paragraphs. These are two surveys and you've car crashed them together into one. They need to be entirely separate or the women's accessible at the end via a "would you like to continue..." question.

Incorrect. One is called Bristol City Women's Football Club. The other is called Bristol City Football Club. I appreciate the sentiment but your logic is flawed. I didn't realise at first that the questions being asked were about the women and wondered why I was being asked the same questions a second time. Perhaps if they want to get both surveys done by all, why not put all the men's team questions first and at the end ask "would you like to continue and answer with regard to Bristol City Women?" much like how many online surveys ask if you want to continue and submit ethnicity data.

I got bored and quit reading. Primarily because it felt long as ****, answering all the same questions for Bristol City AND Bristol City Women. I get it now I've seen here that you can leave answers blank but I didn't realise at the time and most won't either... and most also won't care about the women so they'll drop in useless answers to get through the pages that then skew your results. Two different surveys. Sure, the women's will get less responses but they'll be from people who give a shit.

It's also been proven that the personality test isn't reliable as a set result forever. A large percentage of a test group once did that test again six months later and got different results. It's not a personality test so much but just a judgment of your mood at the time if anything. It is no more useful than one of those YES/NO trees in a teen magazine in the 90s.

Yeah, It's the Myers-Briggs Personality Test... but it's all bullshit. Myers and Briggs were trying to make it as fiction writers and then decided to steal a psychologists unfounded personality claims and developed even more despite having 100% less training than he did. See the video below.

Cry harder. Via Wynes & Nicholas, Environmental Research Letters the below would (per person taking action) save the specified number of tonnes of CO2 per year. .. Have one less child, 58.6 Live car free, 2.4 Avoid one transatlantic flight, 1.6 Buy green energy, 1.47 Switch electric car to car free, 1.15 Eat a plant based diet, 0.82 Replace typical car with hybrid, 0.52 Wash clothes in cold water, 0.25 Hang dry clothes, 0.21 Recycle, 0.21 Upgrade light bulbs, 0.1 13,000 less bits of foam isn't going to change the world buddy. How much of the other stuff above are you willing to give up? Your regular flights alone look like they're probably worse than the foam used for every STH combined.

Christ. Don't know why the club ******* try. It's a gesture. Seemed a nice thought to me. If your'e that bothered about landfill go moan to Hallmark and Clinton Cards about the amount they cause to go to waste on cards, singing cards, pin badges, etc.

Kicking the can down the road.

This is just for organised football though. A lot of kids just play in the playground. 'Headers and volleys' will live on.

Ahhh the "got to be someone so why not us?" argument. Such a convincing one.

Birmingham City weren't called Birmingham City until 1943. If anyone should be upset, it's us.

Half time shows really have escalated.

Normally have to subscribe to a specific channel to watch women finger.

Exactly what I've been saying for the last week too. Nah, never buy shorts without pockets.

Hated that 12th man crap. Cringe as ****.

Or... he likes Messi at PSG and Steph Curry (Massengo is a big basketball fan)

https://www.bcfc.co.uk/news/citys-202223-squad-numbers/ 100% on the ones I guessed. Only two I didn't try was 28 for Pearson and 29 for Owers.

Wilson and Naismith were probably obvious ones at #2 and #4. Sykes at #17 like we saw in training. 100% so far.

My guess for Semenyo was correct too then. Anyone after the Lotto numbers?

Well, my guess for Alex Scott was correct then.

What's the story of George Best in a City kit?