-
Posts
19811 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
19
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Store
Events
Posts posted by downendcity
-
-
Just now, archie andrews said:
Now it like gary collier....
He was a player!
- 1
-
Just now, Major Isewater said:
We could use a third goal to finish them off.
Sorry for being Captain Obvious.Need to break out the squeaky bum oil supplies Major.
- 2
-
-
3 minutes ago, mozo said:
I'm genuinely worrying that we need third... and fourth...
Poor tactics by Manning.
Far too early for us to go into, and hold on to, a 2 goal lead. Better to do that in the 93rd minute!
- 4
-
7 minutes ago, ralphindevon said:
I’m loving Dickie more each day!
- 7
-
42 minutes ago, Ivorguy said:
Word is Twine is not fit
His season seems to be unravelling.
-
19 minutes ago, Bat Fastard said:
I hope Twine is not stringing us along.
He could be the one to tie the opposition in knots
- 1
- 1
-
23 minutes ago, Harry said:
“Dickie would have been a decent option”
Based on what?
Hindsight and fans knowing better than the head coach.
- 2
-
24 minutes ago, old_eastender said:
Bristol City will be kicking themselves if they do not get the job done.
They've had so many chances.
We'd miss!
- 2
-
4 minutes ago, broodje said:
Honestly, these two on RB couldn't describe the Mona Lisa if they were front and centre in the Louvre
2 minutes ago, bcfc01 said:Ugly bird, bit of
a smirksoup on her.For topical accuracy!
- 1
-
1 minute ago, old_eastender said:
Harry Cornick with an ambitious curling attempt from outside the box. The Bristol City substitute gets it all wrong.
Harry Cornick and gets it all wrong, go together like fish and chips or strawberries and cream.
-
3 minutes ago, extonsred said:
Have we ever won a penalty shout out?
We've shouted out for penalties many times but rarely won them.
- 1
-
Just now, elhombrecito said:
I'm generally not a fan of Manning's substitutions , but to criticise him for subbing off a player who hasn't played in months is j
ust ridiculousso OTIB.- 1
-
Just now, Rudy said:
Looks like we're going to extra time, hopefully this doesn't turn out like Leeds vs Plymouth yesterday
You mean when the away team scored 3 ?
- 1
-
7 minutes ago, downendcity said:
Ref: Need a VAR review of the Forest goal
VAR team: Sorry we were watching the Villa Chelsea game but Forest are the premier league team so OK to allow it!
Ref: Need a VAR review of a possible penalty to Bristol City.
VAR team: Sorry we're still watching the VIlla Chelsea game and have seen a great free kick, but Bristol City are not a premier league team, and it's Bristol City so no penalty!
- 2
- 1
-
21 minutes ago, elhombrecito said:
I haven't seen the replay, but everyone seems to be saying handball. But, VAR checked it, no?
Ref: Need a VAR review of the Forest goal
VAR team: Sorry we were watching the Villa Chelsea game but Forest are the premier league team so OK to allow it!
- 1
- 2
- 1
-
-
Just now, Major Isewater said:
Don’t do subtlety then?
Sometimes.
-
1 minute ago, chinapig said:
Apparently using a baked bean tin and a very long piece of string.
That enables someone to hear you fart from miles away!
-
-
5 minutes ago, Major Isewater said:
'king class.
Corrected for you Major!
- 1
- 2
-
18 minutes ago, Harry said:
Is it on Teletext?
I'm following ceefax and would be listening on my radiogram, but one of the valves has blown and the cat's whisker is on the blink.
- 1
- 1
-
1 hour ago, Hxj said:
There is no such thing as a football regulator. It is a member's only club. The clubs agree to the rules and until recently policed them themselves.
You are right, I should have said football administrators.
Clubs policing financial rules and themselves would be like putting Dracula in charge of a blood bank.
- 1
-
14 minutes ago, Davefevs said:
Problem is Mr P, you are looking at the black and white of accounts, not knowing what each club has put into their FFP submissions, including covid allowances. You can base that on the 5/5/2.5, but we all know the rules allowed for more to be allowed (with the right evidence)…and we know City benefitted from that.
Without seeing each club’s FFP submissions, we are just pissing in the wind.
4 minutes ago, Mr Popodopolous said:They did and yes the CFRU seem fine but Cardiff unless I'm misreading it already seem to have been cleared for this season based on that article? Which is surprising.
This is true albeit I struggle to see why there should be a notable uptick in 2021-22 which is a relevant period for the present season. Albeit Wales had some lockdown measures for part of 2021-22 which could add.
Women's Team, Charitable Expenditure, Depreciation etc of Tangible, Amortisation, Impairment of Intangible excluding Player Registrations can be extrapolated.
I'm not at all convinced that we got the same leeway last season, EFL/CFRU can push back on Covid levels too.
Policing of financial rules reminds me of refereeing.
It seems to me that referees these days are naive and even when allied to the "assistance" of VAR, all too often seem oblivious to players cheating by diving, simulation, unpunished relentless holding by defenders in the penalty area etc. etc.
Similarly football's regulators have a set of financial rules that they themselves drafted and police, yet it seems that clubs can duck and dive their way around those rules almost with apparent impunity. Whether it be grossly inflated values of sponsorship by owners related companies or ridiculous COVID allowances ( yes Stoke, I'm looking at you), it's like the emperor's new clothes, everyone else can see it as bu115hit but football's administrators can't/don't/don't want to.
I'm sure someone ( MR P?) will point out that those clubs were only doing what they were allowed. If so, then it only proves how naive ( or negligent) the administrators were when drafting the rules in the first place. As we saw with Derby, the EFL "forgot' to include provision in the rules so that the profit from the sale of a stadium to a related 3rd party could not be used to offset losses for ffp.
Middlesbrough away match thread
in The Havanatopia Match Day Archive
Posted
Agree.
Much prefer the original version that Gary Barlow wrote without a number in it.