Jump to content

Sturny

Members
  • Posts

    4170
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Sturny

  1. 19 minutes ago, Steve Watts said:

    Absolutely.  

    My point was more that to reduce it to 300 out of 67m is very dismissive.  

    The sensible approach is to be cautious, but not worried; but also not complacent.  Seems to me that there seems to be two extremes of views and very little in-between.  We're either all going to die, or no-one is going to be a risk!

    I don't see anyone on here saying we're all going to die or heard anybody say that...

  2. 13 minutes ago, havanatopia said:

    Perhaps so but the fact remains Italy reacted rather late in this regard. That of course does not mean I agree with their quarantining. 

    At the end of the day we have two choices here... We let it run its course by as many common sense measures as possible or we shut down the world the latter of which seems to be China and Italy's approach. Not saying either is right or wrong for any given country. What we do know is that this is not the bubonic plague and since it is not a sensible measured response is better and will be proved so in my opinion.

    For people to come on here and purport to know more than the govt and to throw silly politicised remarks around like half a working week is rather churlish.

    I love how you put these two sentences in the same post.

    • Like 1
    • Flames 1
  3. 9 minutes ago, havanatopia said:

    Not really helped Italy thus far though has it in all fairness!

    Oh deary me. We know this for a fact do we? 

    One country reducing its intake of Chinese is never a bad thing. Lovely people the Armenians. 

    Well yes it has, it could've be much much worse if they didn't quarantine as soon as they did. Same goes for Wuhan in China, it's the only reason it's stabilised over there.

    Since Italy's average age is higher than most paces it made sense. 

    I recommend watching this doctor, he gives you an idea of how important some measures are:

     

    • Like 1
  4. 5 hours ago, havanatopia said:

    Very much doubt it. Especially if the govt continue their sensible approach.

    Latin countries tend to be more family oriented and social and, although not this time of year, spend more time in family get together's. Might also be relevant here. 

    I don't think our approach is sensible as it could be. We're approaching this in a very reactive way rather than proactive.  

    Italy are trying to stay one step ahead of coronavius by shutting schools and large events. We're reacting slowly and I don't see schools etc being closed until its too late. It'll probably happen no matter what, but the spread can be slowed which is the main thing to help hospitals 

  5. 2 minutes ago, ChippenhamRed said:

    My 3% is based on the following from the WHO:

    “Globally, about 3.4% of reported COVID-19 cases have died. By comparison, seasonal flu generally kills far fewer than 1% of those infected.“


    https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---3-march-2020


    I appreciate “reported” is a significant word there, but nonetheless it’s a clear statement from the WHO that the risk is substantially greater than ordinary flu.

    The WHO is far safer to go by of course.

    People have to remember these death rates are occurring when hospitals are working fine. If even 5% of our population catch this the hospitals will be crammed and I'll be surprised if that rate doesn't rise. I agree with your earlier statement, people understating this are very self absorbed.  

     

    • Like 1
  6. 7 minutes ago, ChippenhamRed said:

    This sort of thoughtless ambivalence and disregard for the vulnerable is more dangerous than any “overreaction”. Just getting on with our lives and making no adjustments for a virus with a 3% fatality rate will literally kill people.

    I've seen 3% death rates too but for some reason this site shows 6%... but it's "Just a flu" 

    https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/ 

    In "Closed Cases" 

  7. 14 hours ago, LondonBristolian said:

    He had but he got symptoms a day or two after leaving - so he could have been infecting people for a couple of weeks beforehand...

    The update https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/bristol-news/edf-energy-issue-update-following-3908105 

    Says he didn't pose an infection risk whilst in bristol. So alls good ?

    Tried to buy some hand steriliser over the weekend everywhere was sold out ? 

  8. 3 hours ago, Vincent Vega said:

    When reality hits home.

     

    Screenshot_20200214-081510_Chrome.thumb.jpg.8c768c743a04f37bf7ed134a634ffd65.jpg

    Such a funny thread. Some are so convinced the prices will drive our fans away. They don't understand that what you pay for is what you get. 

    Rover's best days are most likely behind them. 

    • Like 1
  9. 42 minutes ago, The Dolman Pragmatist said:

    After Saturday, not sure that I can justify Hunt (at fault for both goals) ahead of the much-criticised Pisano (who I actually thought had a decent game)...

    But but... apparently we're not allowed to have an opinion on any of these players until they've played 100+ games for us ? ( according to some posters on here)

×
×
  • Create New...