Chairman Mao

Pearson is done. Time to get rid.

Rabiot has been excellent this season for Juve and France.

Charlton has dementia as well sadly. Given he is our greatest player it will be a truly sad day for English football when he passes. As for Pele, a two goals in a world cup final aged what, 17? Incredible.

Praise the Lord, points in the bag, let's hope for a multitude of goaless draws tomorrow!

Well done!

some wag thinks it was Brendan Rodgers in a Leicester match in the comments below.

I've been to plenty of sexist race orgies, no racist sex orgies although I hear they are popular on the continent.

Pearson was sacked after his son was implicated in a racist sex orgy while on a pre season tour in Thailand. Pearson cited 'differences of opinion' at the time. Given the fact he had kept the club up this was clearly a serious rift. As far as I am aware the then owners of Leicester, despite trying to sell the club, are the current owners. I appreciate 7 years is a long time but the rift appears sizable making a return to the club very unlikely imo.

Interesting results. Can safety say we appear upper end of mid table rather than the bottom end I expected. Certainly a nice turn around from the past 3 years of decline.

Dele plays one role. A false 10. He needs two other midfielders to carry him. Now sure, he has an attitude problem, but his inability to play as a 8 has really done him in.

Bradford City style 3rd kit would be pretty cool. But nothing can top Purple and Lime of course.

Shame, if we hold on to Semenyo we'd have half a chance at the playoffs. But we need to balance the books so it's probably for the best.

its just done on average attendance. Still, given how shit we've been over the past 125 years getting 21500 isn't a bad effort.

decent advert for the fans of our club there. Good effort.

I have to admit, after traveling from London for every home game one dire run under Johnson around Christmas time in 2016 was too much for me. Still go away and to the occasional home game but don't really miss it. Did spent £150 making a bespoke (and massive) Union Jack with 'Bristol City FC' for my trip to Sri Lanka to watch the cricket a few years back, quite pleased it was apparently on TV. So no, I'm probably not a 'real' fan, just a bit of an odd one.

Doesn't tell the full story, for example that break where O'Dowda didn't slip in the Cardiff forward was absolutely criminal.

Cardiff aren't bad. Decent result this. Expect us to finish in roughly the same place as them based on this.

Famously, 9-11 was put into action after Man Utd demolished Arsenal 6-1 at Old Trafford earlier that year.

I cut LJ at lot of slack because for quite a while we would improve either our position or points total YoY. That is my view for all managers. If things slip then consideration to their tenure should be given.

Even without the slavery, deaths building stadia, institutionalised 19th century social views and apartheid like conditions this World Cup would be a farce. Won by virtue of bribery and endemic corruption in FIFA, taking place in a country with zero capability, history or interest in football outside sport washing their image. **** Qatar and **** this World Cup. Tragic that Australia lost out to this embarrassing bid. Hoping for a major doping or bribery scandal to take place to cap this shit show off.

Our midfield is not good enough to dominate against quality international opposition. So all this is just window dressing until we get some world class talent in the centre of the park.

Cotts was hamstrung by the squad size but he really made some poor tactical decisions in the 15/16 season. It definitely felt like the L1 winning side were a bit out of their depth in the Championship.

Living in London it is 1. Arsenal 2. Spurs (Gap) 3. West Ham/Chelsea

I was at Spurs last night. Everton were really dreadful, could have been 8-0. Lampard's tactics were woeful and thinking Allan or whatever his name is could cover both Kane and Son dropping deep was delusional. Also, I've not seen a player give up like Richarlson in a very long time, embarrassing.

Perhaps people should educate themselves with statistical modelling before posting in this instance. 400 isn't great, but gives confidence interval of roughly +/- 5% I believe. I think the gold standard for polling is often around 1000 respondents and the accuracy of polling follows the law of diminishing returns from then on. What would be more interesting is the polling methodology and questions used. But that is an entirely different topic.