Jump to content

ciderup

Void
  • Posts

    4903
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Posts posted by ciderup

  1. 1 minute ago, Moor2Sea said:

    I find it all pretty bizarre.

    The Sags appear to be basing their appeal on theft the fact that Sainsbury's weren't very nice to them.

    That may be so, but hardly something that stands up in a court of law.

    I suspect the appeal judges recessed to the pub and had a good laugh.

    I'm inclined to agree M2Sea. It strikes me of a case of 'it's not fair so I'm taking my ball home'. 

    There are no grounds to accept the appeal as far as I can see as naff all new was presented apart from the sags saying the judge was wrong!

    Is that right?

  2. So let me see if I've got this right.

    The scum presented nothing new, just said Sainsbury's were still held by the contract (which the previous judge released them from) and then said the previous judge was wrong?

    It's hardly compelling evidence to force 3 judges to disagree with their esteemed colleague now is it?

  3. 43 minutes ago, pongo88 said:

    Don't be put off by any insults you might get. Keep posting, as anything from the bad lands is interesting. 

    P.S. Are you also a member of the Monster Raving Looney party?

    It always amuses me that this myth of how great the sag 'supported', or supporters in real English, was and is solely perpetuated by the sag fans themselves. They really do think they're something special and make sure they tell everyone. If anybody from a different club remarked on these sensational uber sag fans, I would give it some credence but to blow smoke up your own arse is typical of them!

×
×
  • Create New...