sephjnr

56 minutes ago, TMWANG50 said:

Didn't see the late game but nobody wants to see the Rams buy a Superbowl ring.

Speak for yourself

Jimmy G was gifting pick opportunities for fun and the Rams secondary just couldn't land one until the very end. It was that close. McVay's playcalling and decision making has been absolutely disgusting at times, and pissing two timeouts on stupid reviews helped nobody. If he'd lost that game he'd be gone, and he may very well go if we don't win the 'bowl depending on the circumstances.

With that said both teams played very well, but no marquee Holy **** moments apart from Deebo Samuel getting sparked out early on and needing a breather.

18 minutes ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

It's not like any football administration I've seen before.

The first duty of administrators is to the creditors- is this being fulfilled?

They almost deserve to go bust because of how they're continuing in administration.

More to the point, who's in the position to sue the admins if it's seen that they're deliberately not taking money in to give to creditors? The club itself (thus, MM)? the HMRC?

7 minutes ago, Mr Popodopolous said:

Plus reportedly the administrators have blocked the departure of Tom Lawrence.

So the admins are taking the piss, yes? The entire point of a fire sale is that they can't be picky on the money they get, yet somehow they're finding a way.

2 hours ago, Malago said:

Looks like Jay’s back on the bus.

Shame it only turns up every third game.

Max 7, Kalas and Vyner 3 each and that's more accurate.

4 hours ago, redapple said:

I wouldn’t boo them. They both did well for Bristol City, but football is very much like pantomime as the players know. They get very well paid and know they have to put up with the childishness that comes their way. 

Quite a few times this season the reaction from S28 has transcended 'childishness' and gone into dark places. A few people have trouble seeing that line and others around them are poor at telling them.

1 minute ago, Crackers Corner said:

We seem to be first to the ball, Fulham giving lots of fouls away

And true enough complacency is starting to set with Fulham having chances.

6 minutes ago, East Londoner said:

Not trying to make excuses but Reid did join Cardiff and then do that ridiculous head tapping thing when he signed and some of Bryan’s social media was particularly negative. Although having said that a lot of people forget Bryan was in the away end in that cup game at QPR 

If it takes that much of a reach to think players are scum then the issue lies not with the players.

2 minutes ago, Southport Red said:

Ah Freekick. I was trying to think which player was “FK”

In relegation fights, all of them.

Why the Bobby hate in the stands? He dumped Cardiff first chance he got.

45 minutes ago, MarcusX said:

Personally I think it should either be used in the whole competition or not at all, shouldn't matter what teams are in it

To that effect the FA can help / fully pay for upgraded camera equipment to that end.

15 minutes ago, Ska Junkie said:

Thirdly, why wasn't Towler shown a red today? Looked clean through to me. Good for us but debatable just the same.

The last revision of Last Man I know of says it's only automatically red if he's not attempting to play the ball.

5 hours ago, Never to the dark side said:

Matt Smith and Benik afobe

I enjoyed their time at Ashton Gate,so please no booing

Clear out the mutants from S28 and we may get the kind of response we only had a couple of seasons ago.

10 minutes ago, ExiledAjax said:

Correct, but that isn't because they are near Fulham Broadway station. It's because Stamford Bridge is just outside the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea. The boundary with the Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham runs right along the railway line that runs next to the eastern side of the stadium and separate it from the cemetery on that side. They are very, very close to playing in actual Chelsea though.

#OTIF

(or #NTIC if you're feeling harsh)

21 minutes ago, sephjnr said:

Technically speaking Chelsea do play in Fulham...

37 minutes ago, David Brent said:

I’m sure I remember one year we drew Manchester United in the FA cup but they read out Middlesbrough instead. 

Technically speaking Chelsea do play in Fulham...

The concept of "restock" seems completely alien to that place. Bents' home top is clean out of male adult sizes, as are the white warm-up tops and have been for months.

38 minutes ago, Agard Days Night said:

Sell Bentley. Get Max out on loan for some experience. Sign FF on a free as back up to Ivan Lucic.

Fireworks season is over, so Richard O'Donnell should be safe to pick up again...

1 hour ago, phantom said:

I was amused to see the same - it appears many are still obsessed with our little neighbours from the minimal

8 hours ago, billywedlock said:

Their fans may just wake up and sing F the Morris. He absolutely rung them out . That he is not facing criminal charges shows weakness in our company structures set up. Not sure their damage is over yet, the administrators look to have found a very big pile of poo. 

Peter Risdale never saw court for fleecing Leeds. Steve Dale hasn't seen court for what's happened to Bury. This has to change.

1 minute ago, sephjnr said:

1-2

1-3 AND IT'S SNAKE AGAIN

1-2

SNAKE PENALTY, 1-1

14 hours ago, BS4 on Tour... said:

Where did you get ‘third bout’ from?

This is his third occurance, isn't it? or only his second?

Just now, Mendip City said:

If it is Long Covid then I guess that’s the nature of it, he can do bits and pieces but not a full role…. Lack of energy etc. 
The question for the club is - how long can we run with a part-time manager? The suggestion seems to be that we have been in this position for a month or so…. And the end product hasn’t been good so far. 
It’s all speculation and his health is the only important thing. If he can’t carry on, so be it, we’ll have to replace him and keep paying him - it’s no different to the out of favour players we end up paying to do nothing or, for that matter, a player with a long-term  injury. 

I agree with this. Even if it isn't "long" it's the third bout in a short timespan, and - harsh as it may be - in a 'normal' job it would be under scrutiny from the managment.