Littlesh*t

I don't get this. If szmodics wasn't good enough to dislodge Palmer from the team and then Palmer wasn't good enough for the team why would szmodics then be good enough.

Where does the club stand on what we have to offer him? Obviously he is entitled to his wages but can we say to him he isn't able to use any facilities or train at all with us. I get this will mean his fitness won't be upto scratch and it may make it harder to loan or sell him but if he is really that bad attitude wise surely it will be better to have him as far away as possible from any players.

Quite possibly but I just feel something sounds a bit dodgy about it. Insurance claim?

This sounds a bit dodgy to me. It says that the will upscale security and not thesaurus they don't have any, how on earth could a security guard miss a tractor going up and down the pitch in the middle of the night.

I get what you are saying bug I don't get why this point get brought up. Derby and Reading had points deducted because they cheated. If they hadn't of cheated it could be argued that they would have worse teams and still would have finished below Brum or anyone else.

I think I still have one in the original packaging

How he played in his final months here I can't say I miss him at all

Bentley for me. This may be harsh but I just feel confident with O'Leary in goal. If Bentley isn't going to be our number 1 I feel this is another position we need to look at

Surely teams should have to negotiate with players that in the case of relegation that they have a reduction in wages. After all they are part of the issue that said club got relegated. That way they get there nice big prem wage which reduces as they go down. To protect the player as well they could have it written in that on relegation the club has to accept bids of a certain value if they want an easy release to get back to a top flight club.

I wasn't there and if I was I wouldn't boo but who are you to say who is and isn't a real fan. Everyone has there own opinion on things in life and as long as it doesn't over step the mark and become racist or something else like that then let it be.

I'm not sure Wells would have got himself in that position to begin with for him to be able to miss/score 5he chance

I think you will find they actually won it back on the 6th of November

So you get annoyed that Bradford and Dilton Marsh aren't include but then go on to say it should be Bristol, Somerset and Gloucester. Do you realise these 2 places are both in Wiltshire

Kelly has always come across as an intelligent lad and not one to be chasing the money. I really can't see him leaving Bournemouth who are likely to get promotion for Newcastle who stand a good chance of getting relegated. If he goes up with Bournemouth and plays well he will pick up another prem side in a year ( possibly Newcastle then)

They are both clearly classy players but what impressed me more than anything was the time wasting, tackles and general winding up of there players which I didn't expect from 2 young lads

So by that assumption every paedophile or murder should be known by the company they work for so then all companies become liable. If Man City were aware then I agree they have a case to answer but i don't agree that they are guilty just because they employed the guy

Surely if man city pay up they are admitting that the club itself was aware and did wrong? It was awful what happened but the person has been punished and I am not sure the club should pay up regardless of how much money they have

I admit my wording may not have been great but you are really grasping at one small part. Even though if it cuts up a little bit than would still be "cut up more" than not at all. I know our pitch is great but I admit I am not as informed as you are when it comes to grass. The more games you put on any pitch I would have thought ups the risk of damage especially with bad weather but to be honest I am not really that fussed as it isn't happening and I really don't care about grass as much as you.

I know it is a great pitch. What I am saying is if we have another set of fixtures on the pitch it gives less time for ground keepers and what ever work they do between the current fixtures with extra games on the pitch. Think you are jumping on a comment and taking it as though I am slagging the club off.

I would also add we already have the rugby and football on there so another set of fixtures is going to cut up the pitch more I would have thought

What are the mates rates codes for?

Can't say I am surprised, personally can't see any fans returning until March onwards when we are through next couple of months crappy weather and normal flu season

It's all well and good saying that but players by that point may have agreements in place to go else where.

Sorry if it's already been covered but what will happen if they delay the season and players are out of contract this summer? They aren't going to sign a new contract with the club so could potentially be without key players . Also same for loan players

I'm guessing I am completely missing your point. Yes they may kill more people but if you isolated people with cancer or heart problems it wouldn't stop others getting it, where as you stop people with a virus it helps to contain it.