chinapig

He said at the fans forum that he was staying until the end of January in particular to be involved in the transfer window.

No, Tins is not Director of Football as his job description shows. He doesn't have day to day control of all football activities - unlike Ashton did.

How many other clubs are in the kind of dire financial position as us though? If we scrape through FFP this time it will be because the EFL have accepted our claim to loss of transfer revenue due to Covid. That's a one off that leaves us still needing to make big cuts and/or raise big money through sales that might not be available to spend. In addition, if SL is looking to sell he may need to reduce the debt well beyond what FFP requires to attract a buyer. Looks like a hiding to nothing to any experienced manager with options, though perhaps a rookie at this level might feel they have nothing to lose.

Imagine the interview for a new manager: "We want to challenge for the play offs but you're going to have to help us cut another £10m from our losses at the same time. If we sell a player to do that you're not going to get much to spend if anything so you're stuck with what we have." "OK, thanks for inviting me, bye!"

It does rather call into question Musk's claim that Twitter's moderation policies are unchanged doesn't it?

Because allowing as much of a free for all as they can get away with makes them lots of money.

Will somebody please think about the Sky commentators? They're constantly going to be apologising if we were offended by any swearing we might have heard!?

Were it down to me I'd pin your first 2 tables to the top of the forum for those who still can't see the near impossible circumstances Nigel is operating under.

I thought we had finally reached the point where everybody understood that because of the massive overspending under Ashton and Johnson we needed to greatly reduce our losses to avoid FFP points deductions so don't have any money to spend. It seems I was wrong.

By the same token, when accused of doing sweetheart deals HMRC issued a statement insisting they always recover the full amount due. Or, as it turns out, not. As to the EFL, there are sanctions for failing to pay taxes but are there sanctions for failing to pay 100% of the amount due? Derby will argue that they have paid the reduced amount agreed by HMRC in full so no action should follow. Kieran Maguire said this week that he had spoken to some owners of Championship clubs who had to borrow to meet their tax liabilities and they are furious. But of course we know from Derby fans that they are special so there is that to take into account.

Ben White perhaps, who can cover multiple positions, though Southgate doesn't seem to rate him. More likely Mings, who is not as good as Webster imo.

The keeper is key here imo in that he must be yelling at them to get out of his space. Indeed you sometimes see keepers physically shove defenders further away from goal. I'm not sure our keepers are assertive enough in that respect.

Yes, and no diving, faking injuries, abusing the officials and all the other cynical crap you get in the Premier League.

I've enjoyed this more than any PL game I've seen this season. Lovely to see two well run clubs playing excellent football with top quality goals.

He is a lifelong fan I believe. Judging by the abuse Potter got and is getting I'm not sure what he says represents all Brighton fans though. After all, if the issue is Boehly and they have no problem with Potter why even boo him at all? Not one of Kieran's most objective comments then. Perhaps he should do a sentiment analysis of social media posts from Brighton fans to get a more accurate view??

I should have been clear that it's 2020-21 but given how weak the punishment was (€10m up front for a state owned club is laughable) I don't expect that any further sanctions will be draconian.

A predictably feeble response from UEFA as at 3 September : UEFA announced its Financial Fair Play (FFP) overview for the 2021-22 campaign and eight clubs were found to have breached the regulations. PSG were found to be the biggest offenders when it came to FFP breaches. They have been hit with a staggering €65m bill, which is almost double that of the next greatest offender. They are forced to pay €10m of that up front while the other €55m is conditional, depending on whether they are able to comply with the target they have been set by UEFA. https://www.goal.com/en-au/lists/65m-psg-35m-mourinho-roma-uefa-ffp-fines-listed/blt73e44b5e4205117c#csad4c174bcf600c10

Yes, cashflow. Deal done with HMRC for now. Though if they have to move I doubt that will be the end of their problems. https://www.theguardian.com/football/2022/oct/30/coventry-reach-hmrc-agreement-to-cover-stadium-cflow-shortfall

Yes but that doesn't seem to have registered with their fans. As I say they called it poaching. I call it a lucrative transfer that is benefiting Brighton more than Chelsea. Chelsea fans are not impressed!

I've had some fun debating this with Brighton fans, who keep changing their tune. The main arguments: 1. He sold his soul. But I ask, did he sell his soul when he left Swansea? 2. That doesn't count because he made his reputation at Brighton. No I say he did that with the amazing job he did at Ostersunds. Why didn't Brighton snap him up from there? 3. But he left Swansea in the close season so that doesn't count. He left Brighton after 6 games of this season, which is different. No it isn't, managers don't control when job offers come up. And if you want a transfer window for managers you won't be able to sack a manager however bad the results are until the window opens. 4. Actually it's not really about Potter, Chelsea have taken his support staff, which isn't fair. In most cases support staff follow managers around. Why should this be different for Potter? 5. Yes but they have poached our players too. One actually, to the tune of £65m. Doesn't seem to have weakened them at all. If that's poaching Brighton are welcome to poach one of our young players for that much. 6. We are a well run club and Chelsea aren't. Bit of a false equivalence but Brighton are indeed well run so why not trust them to manage the transition? They've already recruited a very good manager after all because their planning is so good. As I say, great fun debating with fans who instead of celebrating a great win were still consumed with anger. It's only a game people!?

One or two of their best players will have to be sold in January perhaps, possibly for lower fees than they would have got in the summer.

"We can't fill our current stadium but we would definitely fill one 3 times the size." Impeccable reasoning as usual.

I agree, my point was a concern about how he might handle a player like McBurnie in the absence of someone like Klose or Kalas.

Wasps were leaseholders with the stadium run by a separate company, which may also go into administration. I doubt Coventry have the money to buy it and the NEC group are said to be interested. https://www.theguardian.com/football/2022/oct/28/coventry-city-wasps-cbs-arena

Derby inspired by playing their biggest game since the days of Brian Clough obviously.