Barrs Court Red Posted July 8, 2008 Report Share Posted July 8, 2008 For cutting back bushes in the Downs area despite pathetic discrimination calls from those who partake in illeagal activity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Colby-Tit Posted July 8, 2008 Report Share Posted July 8, 2008 Although, in typical Bristol CC style, the cutting of the bushes is part of a 5 year plan. What are they using, nail scissors? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Popodopolous Posted July 8, 2008 Report Share Posted July 8, 2008 It's a beauty spot, and they're getting rid of it!?!?!? However, the activities there cannot be condoned or accepted, but surely there are better ways to deal with it than to remove a beauty spot. I remember, not so long ago, there were protests about it, this is part of the 5 year plan. Could this not be helpful to the Council? Not so very long ago, there were protests about plans to strip bear the trees in Leigh Woods in order to "restore it to it's natural state." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 8, 2008 Report Share Posted July 8, 2008 For cutting back bushes in the Downs area despite pathetic discrimination calls from those who partake in illeagal activity. Rumour has it they found Neo behind a few of them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted July 8, 2008 Report Share Posted July 8, 2008 The EP story has ruffled a few feathers.. check the 150+ comments, its going right off on one! http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/displayNode...Id=144922#views Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barrs Court Red Posted July 8, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 8, 2008 The EP story has ruffled a few feathers.. check the 150+ comments, its going right off on one! http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/displayNode...Id=144922#views It was the same yesterday Tom, and funnily enough just like yesterday they've been forced to stop and remove the comments section, The comments have had us laughing at work for the last two days! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CiderHider Posted July 8, 2008 Report Share Posted July 8, 2008 I wanted to read the comments Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest MaloneFM Posted July 8, 2008 Report Share Posted July 8, 2008 Well I think the old chicken drummers have had a bit of a bum deal here...what? It's not only them that enjoys the company of gentlemen what makes them bushes a rustle. It's all sorts. Mind you someone in the Evil today complained it would ruin his doggerwalking dog walking, walking his dog. Not dogging. At all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbored Posted July 8, 2008 Report Share Posted July 8, 2008 Why not just live and let live? If certain types want to have it off in the bushes then let 'em.Can't see what its got to with any one else as long they are not in public view. Leave the bushes alone I say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zookeeper Posted July 8, 2008 Report Share Posted July 8, 2008 Why not just live and let live? If certain types want to have it off in the bushes then let 'em.Can't see what its got to with any one else as long they are not in public view. Leave the bushes alone I say. err because that what people have homes for!! This is an area where children should be allowed to play! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DanC Posted July 9, 2008 Report Share Posted July 9, 2008 err because that what people have homes for!! This is an area where children should be allowed to play!I don't tend to let my children play in bushes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zookeeper Posted July 9, 2008 Report Share Posted July 9, 2008 I don't tend to let my children play in bushes. Is that because you don't know what people are doing in them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbored Posted July 9, 2008 Report Share Posted July 9, 2008 err because that what people have homes for!! This is an area where children should be allowed to play! How often do you see children playing on the downs near the bushes? Most of the kids play in the wide open spaces.Plus most of the 'activity' that goes on takes place in the evenings when its less likely that kids would be around. Leave them to it I reckon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DanC Posted July 9, 2008 Report Share Posted July 9, 2008 Is that because you don't know what people are doing in them?No because I don't think it's the safest area to let children play. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Henry Posted July 9, 2008 Report Share Posted July 9, 2008 From the guy who thought running onto the pitch at the Rotheram and Palace games, was wrong and dangerous. I'm amazed those comments are coming from you. Why cant these people just have sex indoors like normal people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barrs Court Red Posted July 9, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 9, 2008 How often do you see children playing on the downs near the bushes? Most of the kids play in the wide open spaces.Plus most of the 'activity' that goes on takes place in the evenings when its less likely that kids would be around. Leave them to it I reckon. So you think these illeagal activities are within the rights of the perverted few? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zookeeper Posted July 9, 2008 Report Share Posted July 9, 2008 No because I don't think it's the safest area to let children play. Isn't that the point? They are clearing them and opening out the downs to allow more spaces for everyone to enjoy themselves rather than a minority group of people who think that it is okay to carry out illegal activities. The views from that area should be splendid! Outdoors is not a suitable place to have sex no matter what peoples sexuality is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moth Eaten Pillow Posted July 10, 2008 Report Share Posted July 10, 2008 Its a filthy and dirty practise to be doing outside anyway. Is this bit of land owned by the buggery boys anyway? If not what difference is it to the council chopping back the bushes there and opposite my house the other week? no difference in my mind so why the need to consulte? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest DanC Posted July 10, 2008 Report Share Posted July 10, 2008 Isn't that the point? They are clearing them and opening out the downs to allow more spaces for everyone to enjoy themselves rather than a minority group of people who think that it is okay to carry out illegal activities. The views from that area should be splendid! Outdoors is not a suitable place to have sex no matter what peoples sexuality is.Them bushes have doing nothing wrong yet they are brutally murdered, I'm disgraced to be a Bristolian at this moment in time There is plenty of open spaces for people to enjoy themselves if they wish to do so. This minority group will just now head off to somewhere like Leigh woods. They are not dealing with the problem, They are just putting the problem somewhere else. Nothing wrong with outdoor sex either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbored Posted July 10, 2008 Report Share Posted July 10, 2008 Its a filthy and dirty practise to be doing outside anyway. Is this bit of land owned by the buggery boys anyway? If not what difference is it to the council chopping back the bushes there and opposite my house the other week? no difference in my mind so why the need to consulte? Whoa!! Are you some kind of homophobe? Terms like 'filthy and dirty' and 'buggery boys' are hardly the product of an open mind. Whatever they do its not 'filthy and dirty' to them. Live at let live I reckon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Mosquito Posted July 10, 2008 Report Share Posted July 10, 2008 Them bushes have doing nothing wrong yet they are brutally murdered, I'm disgraced to be a Bristolian at this moment in time There is plenty of open spaces for people to enjoy themselves if they wish to do so. This minority group will just now head off to somewhere like Leigh woods. They are not dealing with the problem, They are just putting the problem somewhere else. Nothing wrong with outdoor sex either. After reading TomF's Evening Post link on this subject I notice that various gobshite Lib-Lab-Con ex Lord Mayors have all vented their opinions on this subject. None of them have mentioned the fact that people will just have their sex elsewhere and what about the effect on the local endangered wildlife? Including the rare Peregrin Falcon that rely on these bushes for their habitat !!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barrs Court Red Posted July 10, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 10, 2008 Whatever they do its not 'filthy and dirty' to them. Live at let live I reckon. b***ocks, it's sad and pathetic. Meeting people in bushes for sex? Whatever the persuasion they should get a life! Anyways, the real issue of this story, which some of you seem to have missed, is that the scheme was called "discriminatry" by a minority group, even though it involves acts that are illeagal. Are we really getting to the stage where our laws will be bent to pander to the minority? Given that forthcoming government legislation will be leagilising discrimination against straight white males, it seems we're already there Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PhatWill Posted July 10, 2008 Report Share Posted July 10, 2008 Personally I think that all those members of the Rainbow group who came out and condoned this kind of behaviour are lucky to still be in jobs. In fact the only reasons they are still in their jobs is 1) They are gay and therefore in a minority group and 2) they are local authority workers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
edson Posted July 10, 2008 Report Share Posted July 10, 2008 Why not just live and let live? If certain types want to have it off in the bushes then let 'em.Can't see what its got to with any one else as long they are not in public view. Leave the bushes alone I say. It breaks public decency laws and is therefore illegal. The law states that it's an offence when the act is either seen or capable of being seen by two members of the public. They are in a public area and therefore capable of being seen by the public. It's odd how, no matter how indefensible, you so regularly take an opposing view just to cause a row. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robbored Posted July 10, 2008 Report Share Posted July 10, 2008 It breaks public decency laws and is therefore illegal. The law states that it's an offence when the act is either seen or capable of being seen by two members of the public. They are in a public area and therefore capable of being seen by the public. It's odd how, no matter how indefensible, you so regularly take an opposing view just to cause a row. Lots of things are an offence. Only today I've seen 3 people on their mobile phones whilst driving.Thats far more dangerous than haing sex in the bushes imo. Streaking at cricket matches is also breaking the decency laws but the perpetrators usually get off with a caution. Mine might be an apposing view but its not an attempt to cause a row as you suggest.My outlook on life has always been 'live at let live'. Who you have sex with and where you have it is not an issue as far I'm concerned - as long as you use common sense and discretion and don't walk down the high street with a hard on sticking out your flies. Theres a beauty spot near where I live that evenings couples often go for car sex - I've seen cars rocking back and forth many times but I'm not offended by it. I'm sure that if I chose to get closer then I could witness the whole act but I just smile at the sight. Live and let live Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Redhyde Posted July 10, 2008 Report Share Posted July 10, 2008 Theres a beauty spot near where I live that evenings couples often go for car sex - I've seen cars rocking back and forth many times but I'm not offended by it. I'm sure that if I chose to get closer then I could witness the whole act but I just smile at the sight. ... ... ... I'm saying nothing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dezgimed Posted July 10, 2008 Report Share Posted July 10, 2008 Theres a beauty spot near where I live that evenings couples often go for car sex - I've seen cars rocking back and forth many times but I'm not offended by it. I'm sure that if I chose to get closer then I could witness the whole act but I just smile at the sight. And then you can walk down the street with a hard on.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sir Colby-Tit Posted July 10, 2008 Report Share Posted July 10, 2008 Outdoors is not a suitable place to have sex no matter what peoples sexuality is. Can be great fun though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barrs Court Red Posted July 10, 2008 Author Report Share Posted July 10, 2008 Priceless Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dezgimed Posted July 10, 2008 Report Share Posted July 10, 2008 Signature material surely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.