Andy082005 Posted March 19, 2009 Report Share Posted March 19, 2009 Whatever you do, don't deport them over here! ; ) Australia worked fine I'm actually quite concerned that there are two "qualified" refs on here who says that you need both hands on the ball?!? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bristolcitysweden Posted March 19, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 19, 2009 I'm actually quite concerned that there are two "qualified" refs on here who says that you need both hands on the ball?!? That's why the " " ? I can not believe it. One thing is the risk of an injury. The second; have you ever seen a keeper holding one hand on the ball wasting time while the forward is closing in? Never. Seems more comfy if was allowed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bristolcitysweden Posted March 19, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 19, 2009 I'd say it's ambiguous at best. I can't say the ref got it wrong. Most keepers got two hands and can control the ball with one or another. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ccfcwelshlad Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 Most keepers got two hands and can control the ball with one or another. You wana stop sucking on that Lemon fella............ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bh red Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 Doing the first save Basso was not in control of the ball as it "rebounds accidentally from him". He then put his left hand on the ball (second save) being in control of the ball as it is between glove and grass. In fact; at the same time Basso put his glove on the ball the Cardiff players left foot was closer to ball and his scoring right foot more than 50 cm. away. If the first save was a "deliberate parry" Basso was in control of the ball and being it a second time putting his glove on the ball Cardiff should have been awarded an indirect free kick. from the fifa book, the goalkeeper is considered to be in control of the ball by touching it with any part of his hands or arms except if the ball rebounds accidentally from him, for example, after he has made a save IT WAS A GOAL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bh red Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 You wana stop sucking on that Lemon fella............ hate to agree with a welshie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest churchill gaffer Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 It's about time you learn the rules then. Are you kidding??????? No definately not Everybody who goes to football should take the referees course so they know the rules If every spectator knew the rules then 80% of bad chanting at the ref would stop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bristolcitysweden Posted March 20, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 No definately not Everybody who goes to football should take the referees course so they know the rules If every spectator knew the rules then 80% of bad chanting at the ref would stop You are wrong about two hands I'm sorry to say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Riaz Posted March 20, 2009 Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 No definately not Everybody who goes to football should take the referees course so they know the rules If every spectator knew the rules then 80% of bad chanting at the ref would stop According to the new rules, one hand and the ground is deemed as being in possesion of the ball...... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bristolcitysweden Posted March 20, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 from the fifa book, the goalkeeper is considered to be in control of the ball by touching it with any part of his hands or arms except if the ball rebounds accidentally from him, for example, after he has made a save IT WAS A GOAL You are right in that when the shot comes it rebounds accidentally from Basso. He was therefore not in control of the ball. That however gives him every right to be the next player on the ball putting his hand on it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bristolcitysweden Posted March 20, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 According to the new rules, one hand and the ground is deemed as being in possesion of the ball...... That new rule is more than 25 years old. Think I'm getting old Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bristolcitysweden Posted March 20, 2009 Author Report Share Posted March 20, 2009 from the fifa book, the goalkeeper is considered to be in control of the ball by touching it with any part of his hands or arms except if the ball rebounds accidentally from him, for example, after he has made a save IT WAS A GOAL Your interpretation seems to suggest that once the ball rebounds accidentally from the keeper he can no more use his hands (at least for claiming the ball). For the rest of the game (handcuffs) or the whole career (amputation)?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.