Jump to content
IGNORED

Reading Match Thread


Longacre_red

Recommended Posts

are we injury prone? 3 subs due to injuries in one game

We never "drop" anyone. Almost all our substitutions or match-day changes are due to "injuries". I don't believe we're as injury prone as the club/GJ would lead us to believe, it seems more a case of trying to keep the public perception of players being dropped for non-footballing reasons. Which is bollocks.

Anyway what the hell is the point of putting on McAllister for Fontaine? We're losing 2-0, our GD is worse than all the teams around us and we're not creating nothing. Just throw caution to the wind and ******* go for it Gary! If we lost 3-0 due to being counter-attacked then fine. Simply playing the same style, tactics and formation throughout just smacks of absolutely no Plan B or clue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You sound disappointed that we haven't conceded more.

A draw would have been a great result in this match - Reading are the form team in the division. Let's try to get something at Plymouth on Tuesday.

Tommy's right, the commentators said it could easily have been 5 at half time and Reading continued to miss chances all of the 2nd half.

One effort from City all game, basically a very poor and uninspired performance by the sound of it, and fortunate not to concede several more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You sound disappointed that we haven't conceded more.

A draw would have been a great result in this match - Reading are the form team in the division. Let's try to get something at Plymouth on Tuesday.

It would have been, but we didnt't sound like we were ever capable of a draw.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...